On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Tony wrote:
> Is it just me that's wondering, but why do you need a journaling
> filesystem for a firewall that runs in RAM? I can understand (I
> guess) if you are using it for a stripped down server application
> like smtp server, or whateverbut I was under the impressi
Ah, I see. I thought perhaps I was missing something.
>
> The sort answer is because I wanted to play with it :)
>
I experiment like that also. Now I understand. I thought perhaps I had my head
somewhere and missed a whole shift in direction with the filesystems.
> There *are* a bunch
Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2001 19:22 schrieb Tony:
> Is it just me that's wondering, but why do you need a journaling filesystem
> for a firewall that runs in RAM? I can understand (I guess) if you are
> using it for a stripped down server application like smtp server, or
> whateverbut I was un
> Is it just me that's wondering, but why do you need a journaling
filesystem for a firewall that runs in RAM? I can understand (I guess) if
you are using it for a stripped down server application like smtp server, or
whateverbut I was under the impression that a journaling filesystem's
best
Is it just me that's wondering, but why do you need a journaling filesystem for a
firewall that runs in RAM? I can understand (I guess) if you are using it for a
stripped down server application like smtp server, or whateverbut I was under the
impression that a journaling filesystem's best
> > Since we have just overcome 2.2.19 issues with Sangoma wanpipe, which
> > are all kernel version/re-compile related, we want to release the new
> > wanpipe.lrp for state-of-the-state Dachstein-CD.
> Fundamentally, there's nothing I'm aware of in 2.2.20 that's mandatory vs
> 2.2.19, once the s
> [ snip ]
>
> We are un-clear as to your plans for 2.2.x kernels ;>
I just want a recent 2.2.x kernel that works.
> Since we have just overcome 2.2.19 issues with Sangoma wanpipe, which
> are all kernel version/re-compile related, we want to release the new
> wanpipe.lrp for state-of-the-state
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> As part of getting a final floppy version released, I have created (yet
> another) new kernel tree .
>
> http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/files/kernels/2.2.20-1-small/
> http://lrp1.steinkuehler.net/files/kernels/2.2.20-1-small/
> http://lrp2.steinkuehler.net/files/ke
