> [ snip ] > > We are un-clear as to your plans for 2.2.x kernels ;>
I just want a recent 2.2.x kernel that works. > Since we have just overcome 2.2.19 issues with Sangoma wanpipe, which > are all kernel version/re-compile related, we want to release the new > wanpipe.lrp for state-of-the-state Dachstein-CD. If the wanpipe stuff breaks again with 2.2.20, let me know. > Please, share your thoughts and plans . . . The existing 2.2.19 kernel trees won't correctly load some of the filesystem modules, which appears to be an interaction between the openwall patches and the reiserfs patch. After a bit of testing, I determined the best way to fix this is to simply drop the reiserfs patch, since I don't really have time to re-compile all the kernels, and I REALLY don't have time to start crawling through kernel code. Anyway, since I was re-compiling everything anyway, I thought I'd try to use 2.2.20, but this is not mandatory. If there are problems with 2.2.20, I can easily drop back to 2.2.19. While I specifically mentioned the VPN_MASQ patches, I'd consider the Sangoma support important as well. Let me know if it's broken in .20, if you have time to test. Fundamentally, there's nothing I'm aware of in 2.2.20 that's mandatory vs 2.2.19, once the security patches have been applied to the 2.2.19 kernels (which the latest 2.2.19-2 kernels have included), so I could go either way... Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
