On 03/16/2012 03:12 AM, Jeremy Tourville wrote:
organ...@hotmail.com added to Mailman - Privacy options... -
Subscription rules - ban_list
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes
https://profiles.google.com/mhnoyes
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:43 -0500, Jeremy Tourville wrote:
-snip-
Message-ID: snt124-w13ca0c41f2080e4178497ef3...@phx.gbl
X-Originating-IP: [122.167.151.240]
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See
http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Diversify your pleasure!...
http://www.clubmedian.hu/friends_links.php?yCID=44jw5
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution
At 12:32 PM 1/5/2004 +0800, Liew Toh Seng wrote:
Hi,
how i'm going to block my users to download the exe files or go to the
porn sites.
This is a difficult problem to address, and one not particularly suited to
firewalls. FIrewalls are better at protecting LAN hosts (and themselves)
from outside
What syslinux version have you tried?
I had only success with version 2.00-pre6 (at the time)
Version 2.00 has just come out, give it a try and test it!
What is the exact error given by syslinux?
-Original Message-
From: S Mohan [mailto:smohan;vsnl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002
Mohan
At 10:15 05.11.2002, you wrote:
.
I also tried Ranish Partition Manager to format the CF card in FAT12 mode.
Still syslinux gave the same error. Syslinux unix version executed under
leaf gives a grsec and segmentation fault.
I ran into this myself when I was building/testing the
;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of
Luis.F.Correia
Sent: 05 November 2002 15:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] (no subject)
What syslinux version have you tried?
I had only success with version 2.00-pre6 (at the time)
Version 2.00 has just come out, give it a try and test it!
What is the exact
No, you run syslinux to create the boot sector ON the CF.
Read the docs.
-Original Message-
From: S Mohan [mailto:smohan;vsnl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Luis.F.Correia; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] (no subject)
Latest syslinux 2.00 stable version
]
[mailto:leaf-user-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of
Luis.F.Correia
Sent: 05 November 2002 15:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] (no subject)
No, you run syslinux to create the boot sector ON the CF.
Read the docs.
-Original Message-
From: S Mohan [mailto:smohan
Hi Erich,
* Erich Titl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021105 01:48]:
[snip]
I ran into this myself when I was building/testing the write protected DOM.
I believe building a (for example) bering kernel without gresecurity could
solve the issue. I am still in the process of defining a viable development
Using 2 linked connection descriptions seems rather strange to
me, but appeared that the IKE session worked properly from
a quick look. Possibly a routing problem of some type (?).
A barf would be much clearer than the status, since I'm
not seeing any clear errors from IPSec in what information
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:36, Simpson, Doug wrote:
I believe it is the firewall or a routing issue. Pardon my ignorance
but I do not know where to look next or what to test or disable.
Has anyone done this successfully? Bering (LRP) and FreeSwan and
SSHSentinel.
THank you for your
Howdy Johnnattanh,
The old LRP mailing lists are virtually unused. Just wanted to let you know
before you got your hopes up about getting a response from that arena.
After rereading your last message I had thought that you were referring to
*.lrp packages. My mistake. I am not familiar with the
Hello Eric,
Well at this time I don't remember where I saw the modules but I'm going
to looking for them and I'll let you know if I find them.
Thank you for the information I'll try zebra.
Yours
Johnnattanh
---
This sf.net email is
Howdy Johnnattanh,
The LRP mailing lists are virtually unused. Just wanted to let you know
before you got your hopes up about getting a response from that arena.
Hello, My name is Johnnattanh
My question is this if I want to my LRP/LEAF box advertise routing tables
with certain protocol
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:59:39 -0700
Scott Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
First we need to know what distro of LEAF are you using. Second, I believe
that within the network.conf there is a segment that describes having an
internal mail server, and allowing connections to make it back to it. I
haven't currently done this, but it will be something I am working on. In
With me, the start sector is 2 too!
And works fine, but for work i have to put the partition with FAT 32mb
And put CHS instead of LBA in BIOS!
=)
Samuel Abreu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I too am trying to boot off a CF card in an IDE
adapters. My problems are happening much earlier. My
system will
This might or might not be a bit off topic, but the machine I have been
working on with my Bering setup is connected to a Belkin KVM switch. Fairly
often when I switch to another machine and then back to the Bering machine
it looses the keyboard. I have tried many things to get it back but
:33 AM
To: Richard Amerman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] (no subject)
This might or might not be a bit off topic, but the machine I have been
working on with my Bering setup is connected to a Belkin KVM switch
Have you tried pressing the Scroll Lock key to see if it unlocks the
keyboard?
At 10:22 AM 6/12/02 -0700, Richard Amerman wrote:
This might or might not be a bit off topic, but the machine I have been
working on with my Bering setup is connected to a Belkin KVM
switch. Fairly often when I
I´m havin a lot of dnyed packets on port 53, like this one:
Mar 14 13:46:13 tptrtr kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
202.139.133.129:46069 200.45.110.178:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x T=237 (#65)
When I check them on http://www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl
I got no advice on it.
Thanks.
Very clear and informative!!
More comments inline
I´m havin a lot of dnyed packets on port 53, like this one:
Mar 14 13:46:13 tptrtr kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
202.139.133.129:46069 200.45.110.178:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0
F=0x T=237 (#65)
The results of lising the
Can anyone help figuring out what's wrong (or may be right)
The packets are TCP (protocol 6) with a source port of 46069 and a
destination port of 53. This is pretty wierd. Port 53 is
for DNS, but
typically DNS queries only use UDP. TCP packets to/from port
53 *ARE* used
to do zone
This question comes up from time to time. After much
research and worrying, it usually turns out to be the
results of a class of tools represented by a product
called Big IP. This tool is sold to companies that want
to tailor the browsing experience of their visitors by
positioning Web
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:57:36 -0600
JamesSturdevant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to add an email service to this machine with a 500MB disk for
storage. I will be making pakages for fetchmail and procmail to retrieve
the email from the ISP, but I need suggestions for smtp and pop3
It seems that I need to restart syslog. Just deleteing the messages
file doesn't seem to work.
When I restart syslog everything is wonderful except that it logs to
the console also. Which doesn't matter a lot in a router but its
kinda irritating.
I tried starting from /, starting it
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Jon
great someone took the time, here just my 2c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 14:52
23.01.2002:
How do I access the Weblet from 'outside'
I have my Dachstein release
This is filling up my logs. Should I be worried, is it something that I
shouldn't have logged?
Dec 7 01:06:34 router kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
24.216.46.129:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=330 S=0x00 I=26282 F=0x T=255
(#42)
This is a DHCP reply from your ISP. Take alook
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Brian Camp wrote:
This is filling up my logs. Should I be worried, is it something that I
shouldn't have logged?
Dec 7 01:06:34 router kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
24.216.46.129:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=330 S=0x00 I=26282 F=0x T=255
(#42)
The
]
To: Mark W. Windish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] (no subject)
Mark:
Okay, so the server allocates the correct IP address,
that's a start. Can I ask though: from the LEAF firewall box,
can you ping this 192.0.0.0
Also, you can use www.gametiger.com to triangulate on your server. You'll
want to use their web form to list your server's current IP address, then
you can go in and search for your server by name. If it is up and
communicating properly with the world, the GameTiger server will see it
and
Scott,
I tried the +ip command and no go...I get a message from the server
couldn't allocate dedicated server ip port. Now if I just run it without
the +ip command it starts and allocates a server IP address of 192.0.0.0
which is my internal ip. I can connect to the server from my other internal
Mark:
Okay, so the server allocates the correct IP address,
that's a start. Can I ask though: from the LEAF firewall box,
can you ping this 192.0.0.0 machine successfully? Perhaps you
just meant that IP address as an example, but perhaps not.
Also, importantly, type this after
34 matches
Mail list logo
