David Pitts wrote:
I would like to use NetMeeting from my Bering protected home network.
My research indicates that requires the H323-conntrack module and maybe
some other configuration. Please feel free to correct me if that's
wrong.
However, I get the impression NetMeeting will still not be fu
pn] Sorry for the PM Victor. I meant to send it to the list.
--- Victor McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not run netmeeting - but this question comes up almost every week.
pn] Doesn't that indicate that it is high on the list of priorities for LEAF users?
> M$ uses dynamically assig
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:47, Peter Nosko wrote:
> pn] Sorry for the PM Victor. I meant to send it to the list.
>
> --- Victor McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do not run netmeeting - but this question comes up almost every week.
>
> pn] Doesn't that indicate that it is high on the lis
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:47, Peter Nosko wrote:
pn] I realize that these distributions are produced by dedicated volunteers and by no means do I
want to come across as being unappreciative of their efforts. But LEAF and NetMeeting have been
around for some time now, and it seem
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:54, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> I don't personally use netmeeting, but I am somewhat familiar with the
> H323 protocol and have helped a few folks get it running. IIRC, simply
> loading the h323 masquerading module (on 2.2 kernels), or it's 2.4
> iptables equivelent w
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 22:17, David Pitts wrote:
> I would like to use NetMeeting from my Bering protected home network.
> My research indicates that requires the H323-conntrack module and maybe
> some other configuration. Please feel free to correct me if that's
> wrong.
>
> However, I get the im
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 08:26, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Yes. The limitations along with the ports used are listed at the link
> below. The h323-conntrack-nat modules are Alpha quality, and may cause
> unexpected problems. Also, I'm not sure if compiled modules are
> available for Bering at this time.
>
>
Dear all,
I know very little about this whole subject, but a colleague of mine
is using nmproxy (http://www.cryogenic.net/nmproxy.html) on his Redhat
box with great success.
I realise that this is a fundamentally different configuration, but
this route might be worth investigating.
A quick inspe
, January 22, 2003 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] H323/NetMeeting support in Bering
Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:47, Peter Nosko wrote:
>> pn] I realize that these distributions are produced by dedicated
volunteers and by no means do I
>> want
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 16:39, John Mullan wrote:
> Well, I looked at the OpenH323 Gatekeeper site and docs. As a
> relatively unskilled Linux person, I would say it looks promising.
> However, it would likely take me a long time to put it into my current
> LEAF configuration even though I do have t
On Thursday 23 January 2003 07:25 pm, Mike Noyes wrote:
> John,
> I believe the gatekeeper should be run from a machine behind your leaf
> box. Unfortunately, I don't think the current h323-conntrack-nat Alpha
> modules support gatekeepers. You may need to use the 2.2.x kernel module
> instead. Th
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 17:25, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 16:39, John Mullan wrote:
> > If anyone has or ends up being successful on implementing this on their
> > LEAF NAT, please let me (and of course the rest of the list) know how
> > you did it.
>
> I second this suggestion.
Ever
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Noyes
> I'm not sure if this will help, but have you considered using a
> Gatekeeper?
pn] Thanks Mike. I'll check out these links.
---
Peter Nosko
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
