23.02.2011 07:08, Mark Berndt пишет:
> Hi list,
>
> I use wondershaper and it works ok, but I notice ppp-shpr in the packages
> list.
>
> What is the difference?
>
Look at code. I didn't use wondershaper so I can't answer anything about
it. ppp-shpr is oriented for usage on VPN/PPPoE/other PPP ser
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 16:08 +1100, Mark Berndt wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I use wondershaper and it works ok, but I notice ppp-shpr in the packages
> list.
>
> What is the difference?
>
> What should I be using for ppp traffic shaping?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marko
Hi Marko,
I don't use ppp myself, but
On 4/24/07, Matt Westveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using the basic shorewall traffic shaping - I may have copied extra
> modules, but the config seems to work for me on 3.0RC1:
>
> Uncommented from the /etc/modules file
>
> #
> # Traffic control modules
> sch_htb
> sch_sfq
> sch_ingress
> c
I'm using the basic shorewall traffic shaping - I may have copied extra
modules, but the config seems to work for me on 3.0RC1:
Uncommented from the /etc/modules file
#
# Traffic control modules
sch_htb
sch_sfq
sch_ingress
cls_fw
cls_u32
My /lib/modules list:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brent P. Gardner wrote:
> Charles-
>
> I am in awe.
>
> "Bandwidth limiting is easy! Just do this:"
>
> <40+ args>
>
> I had to chuckle.
It's actually 3 commands (lifted pretty much directly from the LARTC
HOWTO), but point taken. :)
- --
Cha
-Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Charles Steinkuehler
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:25 PM
> > To: Chris Carbaugh
> > Cc: LEAF
> > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Traffic Shaping
> >
>
f
> Charles Steinkuehler
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:25 PM
> To: Chris Carbaugh
> Cc: LEAF
> Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Traffic Shaping
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Carbaugh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> &g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Carbaugh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to simulate a satellite link for testing purposes. All the
> guides I've found so far deal with prioritizing traffic in order to get
> the most efficient use of the link.
>
> I'm trying to do the opposi
> I've since then discovered qbox.lrp on Sourceforge. It appears to be version
> 1.1. Would that work with the existing Bering uClibc distro?
>
> Also, I did not see anything regarding ipp2p.
>
> ~Doug
qbox.lrp will work on the existing uClibc distro.
You will need to add in bash, htb, and suppor
y, February 20, 2006 07:00 PM
> To: Doug Sampson
> Cc: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-user] traffic shaping - video
>
>
> > I would like to prioritize traffic using Shorewall running
> Bering uClibc
> > 2.3x as follows:
> >
> > 1) vid
Hello Doug,
See my previous mail (for a shorewall solution). You can also take a look
at the qos-htb.lrp package or wshaper.lrp, or if you like to have a
bridged setup on a wrap/pcengines to the q-box project Ron mentioned.
Eric
> This is somewhat related to the other post I posted earlier today
> I would like to prioritize traffic using Shorewall running Bering uClibc
> 2.3x as follows:
>
> 1) video-conferencing
> 2) normal traffic
> 3) P2P sharing
Doug,
I think you may have better luck discussing this with the lartc.org
people. I'm familiar with traffic shaping but have not utilized
sh
James Neave wrote:
Blimey, and I always had a soft spot for tiddles..
Right then, you need to replace those "[" and "]" with "(" and ")"
respectively.
Although looking at mine, I have (( and )). Not sure if this is
necessary. I shall follow the "it's not broken" rule.
The $(( ... )) is necessary, a
ger E McClurg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 September 2004 15:42
To: James Neave
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Traffic Shaping
I did what I should have in the beginning and read the QOS section of
the
Bering Users Guide (RTFM). As a result I saw that I needed to load the
mo
the script?
Thanks
Roger
"James Neave"
09/02/2004 09:31 AM
To: Roger E McClurg/CEG/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: [leaf-user] Traffic Shaping
Hi,
Yes, there are lots of modules that you need to load.
They are in
Hi,
Yes, there are lots of modules that you need to load.
They are in /kernel/net/sched.
I can't remember how I found out which ones I needed. Either I loaded
all of them or I used trial and error.
If you look carefully in the script, there is a comment on how to put it
into debug mode, you add a
Tom Eastep wrote:
> Mark Ivey wrote:
>
>> So am I right in thinking that matching by ports is the best way to do
>> this? What are the practical differences between adding entries to the
>> TOS file and adding entries to the tcrules file? Both can be used to
>> decide which HTB class a packet b
Mark Ivey wrote:
> So am I right in thinking that matching by ports is the best way to do
> this? What are the practical differences between adding entries to the
> TOS file and adding entries to the tcrules file? Both can be used to
> decide which HTB class a packet belongs to, but is one a bet
So am I right in thinking that matching by ports is the best way to do
this? What are the practical differences between adding entries to the
TOS file and adding entries to the tcrules file? Both can be used to
decide which HTB class a packet belongs to, but is one a better solution
than the oth
Mark Ivey wrote:
> I finally got traffic shaping working on my bering rc3 machine. Now I
> want to fine tune my rules, and I have a question. Is it possible to
> match traffic originating from a certain program? What is the best way
> to do this. For example, I would like Warcraft 3/ssh/instan
I had this problem too and resolved it by adding the appropriate
modules. You can find the modules at
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/net/sched/
Todd
Adrian Wooster wrote:
>
> I've installed and am happily running Bering 1.0r3 with a set of basic rules
> but want
> I've installed and am happily running Bering 1.0r3 with
a set of basic rules
> but wanted to play with traffic shaping.
>
> I've loaded the tc.lrp and read that HTB is configured.
However, when I try
> to issue even basic tc commands I get the following
message: "RTNETLINK
> answers: Invalid arg
UDP filter (I think). The
send is 1:20 just so I could keep everything together.
Thanks again Sandro
S
>To: "Simon Bolduc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] Traffic Shaping using TC
>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 20:09:18 +0100
>
]On Behalf Of Simon Bolduc
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] Traffic Shaping using TC
>
>
> When I'm talking about 8-12 K/s I mean Kilobytes per second. My
> connection
> is Cable with 384
IL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Simon Bolduc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Leaf-User"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] Traffic Shaping using TC
>Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:04:58 +0100
>
>Hi Simon, hi all
>
> > slow - with a default setup
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] Traffic Shaping using TC
>
>
> I installed the script - and certain parts work - but somethings
> got really
> slow - with a default setup my ftp server went from
Hi Simon
I just finished my Dachstein QoS Add-On script. I'm did a lot of "research"
in this topic.
I'm still developing the final .lrp package but the core script (without a
package arround it) is finished. I didn't announce it because I want to
finish my advanced script and the package before I
27 matches
Mail list logo
