Re: [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.2.25 released

2011-08-23 Thread Luke
I had started on it, but some personal issues have come up that have diverted my attention rather significantly. I hope to get back to it in the next 45 days or so, if nobody beats me to it. Luke On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Scott Martin wrote: > > Is anyone working on Debian packages any

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Investment Addon

2011-08-10 Thread Luke
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Luke wrote: > >> Cost does not always stay the same--splits, dividends, and selling covered >> calls can change original cost basis, so that needs to be updatable. > > How do dividends affect cost

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Investment Addon

2011-08-09 Thread Luke
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Luke wrote: On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote: 1)  What segments of users are most likely to benefit from this? Interesting.  I'm not sure, actually.  Not even sure how you define segments, but I'll t

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Investment Addon

2011-08-09 Thread Luke
would need to be done for several security classes out of the box. So, the answer to your question is: I'm working on it.:) I'll keep playing with different ideas for this until I find one or some that work(s). May have to make some spreadsheet

[Ledger-smb-users] Investment Addon

2011-08-08 Thread Luke
be "easy", exactly, and we can never account for all possibilities, but I am interested in making it less difficult. Comments? Luke [1] http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Accounting-Principles-I.topicArticleId-21081.html [2] http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Accounting-

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Request for comments: towards CRM functionality

2011-07-23 Thread Luke
and like it or not, we do need it. Jmo, Luke On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Pete Houston wrote: >> I would tend to agree with Bob on this one. If the development of LSMB >> concentrates on making it the best at what it does (whi

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Request for comments: towards CRM functionality

2011-07-23 Thread Luke
Seems useful.:) Luke On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi all; > > Back in 1999, I decided to learn PHP by writing a CRM program. > Naturally the codebase became unmanageable, and was not that much > better than the SQL-Ledger codebase. However, the program wa

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Poll: Most helpful feature after 1.3?

2011-07-22 Thread Luke
lk, that, but for the future, always at least ask. Even an RTFM tells you something you didn't know for certain before--I.E. that the community is either full of people who didn't read your question clearly; or that you need to explain your question in more detail so they know you did re

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Template preference question

2011-07-15 Thread Luke
I do not particularly like the extra spacing, and wouldn't mind seeing it go. Bold and caps would be my preference. Luke On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi all; > > Currently the templates all use boldface and extra spacing to > emphasize the document type. So

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Invoice Calculation Weirdness in 1.21

2011-07-13 Thread Luke
Corrections and update below: On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Luke wrote: > I am running LSMB 1.21 for this installation. > > I have an invoice with a line item as follows: > > Qty: 11 > Price: 12.90 > Disc: 25% > Total: 106.48 > > Now, that total is wrong. It should

[Ledger-smb-users] Invoice Calculation Weirdness in 1.21

2011-07-12 Thread Luke
d the correct 3-precision handling, is abnormal. Can this be reproduced, or is it local to my installation? Luke -- AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Metho

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] [Ledger-smb-devel] Discussion item post-1.3: Variance Accounting

2011-07-09 Thread Luke
software, I think it is quite important in general, and to have a base for further work. Regards, Luke -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of ap

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3-snapshot20110701 available

2011-07-03 Thread Luke
The distribution readmes should also go I think. Erick has it all in his version, and it is better to have it all in one place anyway. We can eventually convert his into an installation manual in HTML, to make section skipping easy. Luke On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > If this

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] User proposal: File attachments to Orders and AR/AP/GL transactions in 1.3

2011-07-03 Thread Luke
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke wrote: Additionally considering adding a checkbox to automatically attach an invoice being emailed or printed. Meaning that the file(s) attached (one checkbox per file) would be included with the email/print job

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] User proposal: File attachments to Orders and AR/AP/GL transactions in 1.3

2011-07-02 Thread Luke
upload would be used. It should auto determine type. One of the libraries, or even the "file" command, or fallback to extension. (Assuming that's what you mean by type [MIME type].) Luke -- All of the da

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] [Ledger-smb-devel] A feature request: file attachments

2011-07-02 Thread Luke
gt; significant performance hit. Perhaps these > attachments could be stored in the file system instead. > > Does anyone else think it would be useful to drill > down through the reports in LSMB and find the >

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] bug? in 1.2.x: departments/accounts/projects change unpredictably on update or post

2011-06-16 Thread Luke
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, brush wrote: > hi luke, > > my oh my, after a few quick tests it seems you've nailed the behavior. (this > is the "problem" with me not being the regular data entry person.) at least > in > 1.2 -- i think that in 1.1 the behavior may have

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] bug? in 1.2.x: departments/accounts/projects change unpredictably on update or post

2011-06-16 Thread Luke
27;s the only time I have noticed something similar. Luke On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, brush wrote: > hi folks, > > i'd love help with a nagging problem: > > on AR/AP entries, the selected values for department, project, expense/income > account, and employee are all vulnerabl

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] If we are putting in 1.3 proposals....

2011-06-15 Thread Luke
acefully > backported to 1.2 either, but depending on contributions I could try) > 3) backporting to 1.2. +1 > Anywhere else folks want arbitrary files added? Customers? Vendors? Parts? Parts would be nice, although no

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Development progress

2011-06-14 Thread Luke
me, I created a new virtual machine over the weekend, and will begin testing the trunk version this week. So hopefully will have some constructive feedback by Saturday. I'll be testing in lenny, mainly because I could not get Ubuntu to install with debootstrap. I hope to make a Debian dep

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] If we are putting in 1.3 proposals....

2011-06-13 Thread Luke
ield, and a button. After it's up, it's a download link for that file, and a new file field for another one, and so on for as many files. To me, the biggest technical question, is what you do with files in the intermediate steps of form handling

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] If we are putting in 1.3 proposals....

2011-06-13 Thread Luke
Erik For the record, while I don't necessarily disagree with you, that is a *very* old feature request. Me and others have been talking about it since SQL-Ledger days, and have here many times over the years. Luke On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Alvin, > >

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] usage proposal for 1.3: Customer History

2011-06-13 Thread Luke
this acceptable to everyone? It is to me. Luke -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-12 Thread Luke
t in orders so far, although that may not mean anything. Luke On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > I am looking into this issue specifically. I am hoping to get 1.2.22 > out tomorrow but maybe we can get a fix for whatever the behavior is > in 1.2.23? > >

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-11 Thread Luke
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_orde

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-11 Thread Luke
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_orde

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] HTML Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Luke
Duplicated problem with an old order. I don't usually print HTML orders with the stock template (which this is), so don't know if this would have happened before 1.2.21. Luke On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Luke wrote: > Okay, this was tested with the same order as the last problem. I wil

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Luke
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_orde

[Ledger-smb-users] HTML Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Luke
. Telephone: 123-456-7890 City State 12345 Does the HTML template handler have some problem with conditionals in 1.2.21? The code right before the line, is: Luke -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most techni

[Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Luke
I've never run into this. Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this. The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_order_1109.log exists anywhere, I can't find it. Error! This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.4

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Forgetting to post printed/mailed invoices: add Print+Post button?

2011-05-31 Thread Luke
;s been a lot of rewriting > toward 1.3. However, it doesn't hurt to check. There shouldn't have been that much rewriting in the 1.2 branch, which is what I think he's talking about. If the patch is against 1.2.18, chances see

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Forgetting to post printed/mailed invoices: add Print+Post button?

2011-05-20 Thread Luke
I started to respond point by point, but I'll just instead say: +1 on all points. Luke On Tue, 17 May 2011, ario wrote: > Great idea, at least with respect to the Post command. > For Update I don't consider it very useful, but who am I... > But, configurability of

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
f a huge job than it seems to be. I am willing to undertake the first stages of it, once the installation problems are history. Luke -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn h

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Luke wrote: >> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: >> >>> So let me suggest a priority list at present: >> >> Where does a snapshot or beta release fit into that priority lis

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
/or that we can't do any incremental schema changes, then maybe addons will be sufficient. Luke -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reac

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > So let me suggest a priority list at present: Where does a snapshot or beta release fit into that priority list? -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read thi

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
could appoint some individuals to head up some of these efforts, and keep them on track, running them in parallel. Even if Chris has to be involved with all of them in a support capacity for a while, having others coordinating individual efforts is still going to make it easier on him, assuming he wa

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
e other than Chris to help with that, if it can be installed successfully and predictably. I'd say they are close to equal, but I'd maybe put installation first. Just my .02 Luke -- What Every C/C++ and Fortra

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Luke wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: probably a good idea to find a mode where releases get only big enough to address a small number of specific issues (and the regular bug fixes) on the point

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Luke wrote: > Why not start phasing out (by rewriting) SL/old code, during the > sub-releases of 1.3? > After the main release of 1.3.0, set a list of things to be rewritten. As > bugs are fixed, etc., and new versions are released, the replacement code > can

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
ng it slowly may be the best way. That said, sadly, since we already know that the plan for 2.X is for a new codebase (or was, at least), I doubt many will be willing to do the work. So ultimately, maybe my suggestion should be to just leave it al

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
at might satisfy only a small group of current users, but the continued development could easily attract new users too. That would be a net benefit. Y! E! S! Exactly that. Luke-- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] [Ledger-smb-devel] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
ren't required for major operations, disable them in the official version, announce them as pending and do subreleases to add them. (Obviously, I'm not exactly up to date on what is and isn't working in the latest versions of 1.3. Last time I pulled a copy was probably over a year a

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
k, and be useful, not as just an intermediate step, how can they build interest in the wider community of users, who just want something that works? (I do not claim to be a developer, having never contributed code other than in templates, and that minor) > If Erik, Luke, Lyle, Jeff, David M

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Forgetting to post printed/mailed invoices: add Print+Post button?

2011-05-17 Thread Luke
ows (W) bugging the user (U) with: > W: Are sure? (press 'NO' or 'Cancel') > U: 'Yes?' > W: You are about to leave this window, go to 'Properties|Settings| > Confirm' to leave if you

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Forgetting to post printed/mailed invoices: add Print+Post button?

2011-05-17 Thread Luke
. That would prevent creating two invoices at once in separate windows, but I'm not sure you can do that now anyway. Luke On Wed, 18 May 2011, david wrote: > I also forget to post sometimes because of a different human error. > Regardless of check boxes or different buttons it would

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Forgetting to post printed/mailed invoices: add Print+Post button?

2011-05-16 Thread Luke
say I like it, you could add some "don't post yet" checkbox. Re 3: maybe change the checkboxes to buttons on already-posted documents? 4 could probably be solved in javascript, but you trade off portability. Luke --

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Postgres problem on LedgerSMB (Ubuntu 10.10)

2011-05-02 Thread Luke
I've upgraded PostGreSQL on Ubuntu many times, and never ran into any such strangeness as that. I'm not even exactly sure how a reboot would fix that, unless it be a library being cached for some reason. Hmm, some other process keeping it open maybe? >

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Linking accounts

2011-05-01 Thread Luke
you should have started with the service COA? It would have better default accounts for you to base your new accounts on, and you will be able to see the arrangement of checkboxes on accounts that are already more sim

[Ledger-smb-users] Poll re @ signs in user names

2011-04-20 Thread Luke
clutter the list with the hordes of positive responses, but I really suspect a trickle here. Still, feel free to write off list, and I'll tabulate what I get. Thanks Luke (account...@lists.tacticus.com) -- Benefiting

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-03-04 Thread Luke
I have been able to figure out about the PayPal API, that is not a feature. It doesn't mean it can't be done, but it's not among the listed features. Luke -- What You Don't Know About Data Connectivi

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-03-04 Thread Luke
ll be quite a fine thing. I have started looking at the possibilities there. A daemon or inetd application will have to be written to receive, queue, and so on. I presume you would want it written in PERL, which is not m

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-02-23 Thread Luke
recurring payments. I think those are for pre-set fixed amounts only, although I haven't looked into them. Luke -- Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-02-23 Thread Luke
l. Care to share your code/implementation? No point in re-inventing the wheel if you've got it going already. Regards, Luke -- Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-02-23 Thread Luke
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Luke wrote: > I need to track down the PayPal link/button generation code. Which I have now done. In its seemingly most basic form, it goes something like this: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?business=email_address@to_be_paid&cmd=_xclick¤cy_code=USD&a

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-02-23 Thread Luke
the statement.html that > gets generated from the aging report... I need to track down the PayPal link/button generation code. This seems doable. Not exactly what I had in mind, but far quicker to implement most likely. Luke --

[Ledger-smb-users] PayPal Integration

2011-02-22 Thread Luke
the posted invoice. There are other directions to use in coming up with something similar, and I'm not sure how good an idea this is, but it was in interesting thought, since I just basically performed the manual version of that

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] adding notes after posting invoices

2011-02-04 Thread Luke
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Luke wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, david wrote: Is there a way to add notes to invoices after posting? I know that reposting an invoice is bad practice, but I often find that I want to add some sort of non-financial

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] adding notes after posting invoices

2011-02-03 Thread Luke
f us. It doesn't exist in 1.2, unfortunately. Luke -- The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's connect

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Template Conditional Logic?

2011-02-03 Thread Luke
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Luke wrote: > In particular, for cases where the duedate and invdate are the same in a > tex invoice, I would like to print "UPON RECEIPT", instead of the > actual due date. > [.] > I have thought of at least one inconvenient way, using custom PERL an

[Ledger-smb-users] Template Conditional Logic?

2011-02-03 Thread Luke
way to do this? I have thought of at least one inconvenient way, using custom PERL and an alternate variable for duedate storage, but I'd like to avoid that if possible. Luke -- Special Offer-- Download ArcSight

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] An Actual Payroll Module - When?

2011-01-31 Thread Luke
y in DB code, and leave the locality specifics up to a more common language, that the normal power user or his tax pro has some hope of being able to handle. Even if it's not a great hope, at least it's "we use a standard spreadsheet type interface to handle this", which makes the

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] An Actual Payroll Module - When?

2011-01-31 Thread Luke
ded is some national subscription based database of rules, that is updated very! regularly, and is sponsored by users or clients or some such. Even so, doing that without CPAs on staff would be tricky and lawsuite prone I would think. That's why they have payroll co

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Choosing which Ledger to use?

2011-01-30 Thread Luke
e to be a server side API, and all clients talking to that, including a web service client, which would then serve web clients, which would probably be running on the same server as the server side software. Maybe interact through XML exchange or the like, to keep it stateless. > these days.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Choosing which Ledger to use?

2011-01-29 Thread Luke
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Luke wrote: > The version 2 of LedgerSMB that is in the planning stages, has a lot of great > ideas behind it, and could certainly benefit from professional PERL > programmers. Wait, let me rephrase that. ... Could certainly benefit from a few more professi

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Choosing which Ledger to use?

2011-01-29 Thread Luke
great ideas behind it, and could certainly benefit from professional PERL programmers. Luke On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Lyle wrote: Hi All,   I'm a full time Perl developer, looking to use a Perl based accounting package so I can jump into the code if I have issues. SQL Ledger and LedgerSMB seem

[Ledger-smb-users] Preemptive Price Adjustments?

2011-01-29 Thread Luke
03/01/2011, and enter the new sellprice and cost. Now, since my example does not in fact work (the price is updated immediately), is there any way to make this happen? Luke -- Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Customers who are vendors?

2011-01-19 Thread Luke
I believe that exists in 1.3, but in 1.2 you must create a customer and a vendor--they are unrelated. Luke On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jigme Datse Rasku wrote: > I have one customer who is also a vendor. I know that last time I was > working with LedgerSMB that there was desire to move tow

[Ledger-smb-users] Sales tax accounting question

2011-01-13 Thread Luke
ow best to zero these out, or even if I should. I imagine that I should create a 12/31/2010 entry, which posts a zeroing amount from somewhere. Maybe an expense account of "uncollected sales taxes" or some such? Thanks Luke -

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] setup for external line of credit

2011-01-09 Thread Luke
normal checking account. Most credit lines have a second method of access: either a debit card or similar, or the ability to do ACH transfers. Are you 100% certain that the ACH option is not available to you? Luke On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Previous to this past No

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Printing issue in Windows

2010-11-02 Thread Luke
thinking something like: set fn=%1 set outfile=%fn:~0,14%.pdf I don't know if the filename can be passed in, however, so maybe this is whistling in the wind. Luke -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling

[Ledger-smb-users] Accounting: sales tax discounts

2010-10-27 Thread Luke
ut leaves those accounts un-reconcilable during the year. Am I on the right track here? Regards, Luke -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the No

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] problems with an invoice number

2010-10-07 Thread Luke
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:50 -0400, Luke wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote: >> >>> Hmm, the problem was it wouldn't et him post the 1297 invoice, almost as >>> though there was a collisi

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] problems with an invoice number

2010-10-06 Thread Luke
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote: > His workflow is pretty consistent, but he *may* have emailed the invoice > before posting. I'll check with him. Nothing wrong with that, as long as he remembers to post after he emails

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] problems with an invoice number

2010-10-06 Thread Luke
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote: > Hmm, the problem was it wouldn't et him post the 1297 invoice, almost as > though there was a collision - but no such invoice exists in the > database. What does "wouldn

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] problems with an invoice number

2010-10-05 Thread Luke
). > c) does anybody have any idea why such a thing would happen? He forgot to click post? That's the most obvious and likely answer. Alternatively, maybe the web connection was lost at the moment it tried to post, although that should have resulted in a visible er

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB.org domain name expired?

2010-09-21 Thread Luke
Ditto from me on hosting, helping with, etc., the site. Luke On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Barry Clearwater wrote: > Why are the devs allowing the ledger-smb website to be so horribly spammed? > Its an absolute disgrace and very bad for the organisations profile. > > If nobody will put thei

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Updating assembly BOMs

2010-09-16 Thread Luke
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Marco Hess wrote: > I found that I could do a Save As New. Update the new part and make the > previous obsolete. Is that how it is supposed to work? That is the most likely way--obsolete the old one, and create a new one with the same partnumber.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Perl upgrade

2010-09-07 Thread Luke
ould be wrong about that, but there are plenty of us using 18 with no such problems as he's having. Luke -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parall

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Perl upgrade

2010-09-05 Thread Luke
et to "administrator" on that settings page? If it's user, supervisor, etc., and not administrator, you could have such problems. Luke-- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your paralle

[Ledger-smb-users] Order schedule posted w/invoice?

2010-08-31 Thread Luke
Is it normal, in the case of a recurring order, for the invoice generated therefrom to also become recurring? That seems to be what I have happening. (1.2.18) Luke -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show

[Ledger-smb-users] Odd double invoice

2010-08-13 Thread Luke
delete the invoice (for services only), and only a single copy remained. Luke -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sf

[Ledger-smb-users] Accounting for Payment Of Sales Taxes

2010-08-02 Thread Luke
jurisdiction, as I now am again. What must I do to have some record of this--I.E. apply it to a "sales taxes paid" expense account? Thanks. Luke -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use t

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Ledger Error

2010-07-30 Thread Luke
Forgot to ask: which version are you running? Method 2 is the proper one. Are you hitting "update" before you try to post? Luke On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Monika Koper wrote: > I try every posible steps : > 1. I open the transaction (unpaid invoice) and on the bottom input date

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Ledger Error

2010-07-29 Thread Luke
How are you trying to receive payment? That is: what steps are you following, and what is the error? Regards, Luke On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Monika Koper wrote: > Dear All > > I stuck in one point on SMB. when I issue an invoice for somebody in > EURO and then after a month or so I

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] account number change allowed?

2010-06-22 Thread Luke
Yes. On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, ario wrote: > Hello, > > is it allowed to change the account number of an account which is > already populated with data? > > Thanks. > ario > > > -- > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for t

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running Multiple Profiles with Firefox was Recurrent "session expired" notices

2010-05-10 Thread Luke
Great stuff, David. Is this done the same way for our Windows using friends? If you know... Regards, Luke On Mon, 10 May 2010, David Godfrey wrote: > Sorry all, > > The url below was incorrect, it should have been > http://www.sbts.com.au/lsmb/addons.php > > David Godfrey

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Recurrent "session expired" notices

2010-05-08 Thread Luke
On Sat, 8 May 2010, ERACC Subscriptions wrote: > this works on Ubuntu. Since the 'buntu folk do stuff rather odd by > avoiding su in favor of sudo one may need to figure out how to do this > using sudo. Arguably, sudo is more secure, which is why they do that. Regardless, su is still there, and c

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] invoice template and taxnumber

2010-05-05 Thread Luke
Try customertaxnumber. That was an old variable, but it may still be the one in use. Luke On Wed, 5 May 2010, Janeks wrote: > I also tried following clauses: > > > VAT number. > > > But it either does not helps - it shows just empty space. > :( > > Than

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Yearend Transactions

2010-04-25 Thread Luke
Fine, that's what I thought. However, what then is the meaning of this from the manual? Equity drawing/dividend accounts are also moved, but the investment accounts are not. Luke -- _

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Yearend Transactions

2010-04-25 Thread Luke
ders are not being paid, so that aspect of the information is not strictly relevant, although interesting. Properly handling retained earnings and equity is very much relevant. Regards, Luke -- _

[Ledger-smb-users] Yearend Transactions

2010-04-24 Thread Luke
. Given that I want to use cash basis for these, do I understand correctly (again from the SL manual not the LSMB one), that I need to post full payment/receipt to any open transactions, and post new versions of those with the outstanding amounts, awaiting payment/rece

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-22 Thread Luke
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Luke wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: >> >>> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) >>> >> Did Chris actually say that? > Yes. I asked that question on the list.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Luke
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) Did Chris actually say that? Additionally, it being open source, support is at the discretion of the community is it not? L

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Quick Syntax Question

2010-04-18 Thread Luke
x27;t looked into how yet. Luke On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Ken Smith wrote: > Simple question - what's the right syntax to get the invoice numbers to > be in YYMMDDNN format. I've tried and in > the defaults and I find I can swap the month and date round but the year > is alw

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Some newbie questions

2010-04-17 Thread Luke
ll the rights get assigned to the user so it can't > create customers, see the chart of accounts. Even when you check all of the boxes and hit save? Luke -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software

[Ledger-smb-users] Small Feature Suggestion

2010-04-01 Thread Luke
It would be convenient to allow the name generated for PDF files to be tokenized via defaults. I suggest it as a feature.:) Luke -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed

[Ledger-smb-users] 1.2 item not on file thoughts

2010-03-29 Thread Luke
any value to a failure to provide information. Luke -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performanc

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Remote login

2010-03-26 Thread Luke
but I'm not sold on your reasons for avoiding OpenVPN yet. Luke -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications fo

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Remote login

2010-03-26 Thread Luke
Wouldn't OpenVPN be a bit more robust for that application? Not that ssh is the wrong way, just that if you know the endpoints most of the time, OpenVPN gives you a more stable connection. It also has the upside of not having much issue with firewalls. Luke On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, David Go

  1   2   3   >