Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-22 Thread Luke
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Luke wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: >> >>> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) >>> >> Did Chris actually say that? > Yes. I asked that question on the list. I don't remember exactly (quick > archives s

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread Luis E.
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:01 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Absolutely not. Chris has worked really hard and also provides > extensive/free support on this mailing list which is as good as any > commercial support or even better. And we are all really grateful to > him > (and other contributors as w

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Luke wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > >> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) > > Did Chris actually say that?  Additionally, it being open source, support > is at the discretion of the community is it not? > The o

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread Armaghan Saqib
Luis E. Muñoz wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:50 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > >> Hi Luis, I can understand your position but here are few other issues: >> >> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) >> 2. LedgerSMB 1.3 (a quite different db structure) is not in >> pr

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread Luis E.
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 02:36 -0400, Luke wrote: > > Did Chris actually say that? Additionally, it being open source, > support is at the discretion of the community is it not? That would be my expectation. Regards -lem -

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread Luis E.
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:50 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Hi Luis, I can understand your position but here are few other issues: > > 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) > 2. LedgerSMB 1.3 (a quite different db structure) is not in > production > yet and we don't hav

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread Armaghan Saqib
Luke wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > >> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) >> > Did Chris actually say that? Yes. I asked that question on the list. I don't remember exactly (quick archives search could not get me that email) but he sa

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-21 Thread lai
> Thanks Tim. Your welcome! I recall last year when we upgarded to Centos 5.3 and SL 2.6 we were neck deep...the Centos/Perl distribution by default compiles with usethread. > We found the info you kindly pointed us to before asking the question. > In some cases, the error goes away, although it

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Luke
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) Did Chris actually say that? Additionally, it being open source, support is at the discretion of the community is it not? Luke --

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Armaghan Saqib
Luis E. Muñoz wrote: > However, the inspection of the codebase that I did while researching > this incident, as well as the rest of what I found, provided all the > justification we needed to jump ship. At the time we'll keep running an > Etch version until we close this FY. Then we can start with

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Luis E.
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 19:59 -0700, l...@clustersolutions.net wrote: > no need to run...it has to do with perl and certain platforms. > checkout > the links below...we were able to solve it in an afternoon. just > recompile > perl without the usethread option. we are using sl 2.8.17., and will > be

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread lai
no need to run...it has to do with perl and certain platforms. checkout the links below...we were able to solve it in an afternoon. just recompile perl without the usethread option. we are using sl 2.8.17., and will be using it probably for the next ten years as we had invested a lot of times in re

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Luis E.
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 09:35 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > I have helped customers migrate. I can do this for you, or look at > this: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/ledger-smb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02083.html Thank you Chris! This certainly looks useful. We're considering our options h

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Chris Travers
I have helped customers migrate. I can do this for you, or look at this: http://www.mail-archive.com/ledger-smb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02083.html Read the whole thread as it discusses various issues I ran into and what the solutions were. Best Wishes, Chris Travers

[Ledger-smb-users] Running away from SQL-Ledger

2010-04-20 Thread Luis E.
Hi there, My company was bitten by the bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503832 http://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=50142 after upgrading to Debian Lenny. I'm currently running SQL-Ledger 2.8.16-1 (the version that ships with Lenny). We would like to move away