NON-LEAGUE DAY IS COMING
By James Bartaby, from the blog at http://undertheleague.com
It's that time of the season again; when the top two Divisions take a break
for international football and the country's non-League clubs try and take
some of the limelight. This Saturday 13 October, sees the
Why is it we're so quick to accept the words of a serial liar and two guys
we've never heard of before, who have an obvious vested interest, over an
organised collective of fellow Leeds fans?
My reading of this statement is out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Like Bates, GFH have no money.
You're not wrong Paul
Damian
Le 11 oct. 2012 08:40, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com a écrit :
Why is it we're so quick to accept the words of a serial liar and two guys
we've never heard of before, who have an obvious vested interest, over an
organised collective of fellow Leeds fans?
My
Well, lets see if LUST respond and say they did speak to them as per
their last release.
At the moment, all options seem bad!
On 11 Oct 2012, at 07:40, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
Why is it we're so quick to accept the words of a serial liar and two guys
we've never heard of before,
Having read all the statements by LUST, they always seem to say what they
(we) want for Leeds in a correct way. They NEVER slag Bates off directly
and say things that they know for sure.
Gary Cooper (LUST) always speaks very well, when I've seen/heard him. He's
always dignified and never gets
I think the problem here is that GFH are only middle men and this is
exacerbated by the fact that they either don't have an end buyer for the
club or their previously agreed end buyer has gone cold on them for
whatever reason.
From day one GFH have been close to Bates. They both need each
Why is it we're so quick to accept the words of a serial liar and two
guys we've never heard of before, who have an obvious vested interest,
over an organised collective of fellow Leeds fans?
My reading of this statement is out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Like Bates, GFH have no money.
I reckon the LUST has never been right about any of the imminent
statements and all that. They ve set some expectations that were never
met. The LUST has been too chatty without substance.
At the same time I dont trust KB or the other bloke. I think KB asked
the other guy to release the
I just feel so stupid for being hopeful and optimistic in the first place.
To quote John Cleese Its not the despair, I can take the despair ,it's the
hope I can't stand
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
On 11/10/2012 09:28, Eric B wrote:
I reckon the LUST has never been right about any of the imminent
statements and all that. They ve set some expectations that were never
met. The LUST has been too chatty without substance.
This is what I understand LUST's position to be (a position with
L.U.S.T. Annual General Meeting 2012 Public Meeting
DateFriday, September 7, 2012 at 12:27AM
New Farnley Cricket Club, Barry Jackson Ground, Lawns Lane, New Farnley,
Leeds LS12 5ES MAP
7.00pm - Thursday 11th October 2012
All Shareholders and members are welcome
The agenda is as follows:-
On 11 October 2012 08:42, swin...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I think the problem here is that GFH are only middle men and this is
exacerbated by the fact that they either don't have an end buyer for the
club or their previously agreed end buyer has gone cold on them for
whatever reason.
Really? I
On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote:
Really? I thought they'd clarified this confusing point many times -
they are going to be the beneficial owners of LUFC are they not (despite
not having any money to buy us...)
I'd be very surprised if they did Andy - its not what GFH do. No I'm
sure
*Alternatively you can ask your questions via our Twitter feed or on our
Facebook page, so no reason to not get involved!
*
There is a fault in the logic of that sentence!
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
I have to say that I remain confused and slightly annoyed about people who
continue to have a pop at LUST. I along with around 8,000 other fans have more
faith in LUST than I do in Bates and GFH are not doing themselves any favours
issuing joint statements of this nature.
LUST has proof of
Football fans would have more civil liberties in prison
From The New Scottisg review
Stuart Waiton
The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas.
(Karl Marx, The German Ideology)
The outrage and apologies by the authorities following the Hillsborough
revelations suggests
Me too. I must have missed the bit where LUST helped Jimmy Savile out over the
years and helped teachers run off to france with pupils
Its democratic isn't it? So if they aren't the right people to represent the
fans then vote them out and bring in new people.
At least someone is doing
Just to be clear, I am not condemning LUST personally - I should have
put a ? at the end of the subject line.
I think maybe right about this being led by the club but find it odd
that we've not had a push back from LUST. Maybe it will come.
On 11 Oct 2012, at 17:15, Phill Shields
A rep of LUST has rejected GFH's comments about no contact on WACCOE.
MOT
Sent from Samsung mobile
Jim Moran wrote:
Just to be clear, I am not condemning LUST personally - I should have
put a ? at the end of the subject line.
I think maybe right about this being led by
Nice one. Lets not get in bed with GFH then eh?
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
Nice one. Lets not get in bed with GFH then eh?
you might have noticed, but we have absolutely zilch input into this
process whatsoever. LUST are trying to let us know what they know - Bates
and GFH are doing whatever the fuck they want with their assets (ie our
club) under the cloak of a
I dont mind the LUST at all. I think there is a need for it the way KB
goes about doing things.
I was just saying we ve heard a few times from the LUST and its
sources that its imminent just for this to be postponed
a little while later. After a few times of this happening you either:
1. keep
You're right Eric.
Bates can get away with having no credibility as he doesn't need it.
LUST, sadly, need either cash or credibility.
On 11 Oct 2012, at 23:40, Eric B barl...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont mind the LUST at all. I think there is a need for it the way KB
goes about doing things.
I
23 matches
Mail list logo
