.
Like Bates, GFH are in it for themselves.
Like Bates, GFH have shown that they have no regard for real fans.
Like Bates, we'll probably be bust within 18 months again!
Therefore let me be the first to say HAIGH OUT!!!
Cheers
Paul
Jim Moran wrote:
Subject: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail
to say HAIGH OUT!!!
Cheers
Paul
Jim Moran wrote:
Subject: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
http://www.leedsunited.com/news/20121010/joint-statement-from-club-and-
gfh_2247585_2945358
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options
fans.
Like Bates, we'll probably be bust within 18 months again!
Therefore let me be the first to say HAIGH OUT!!!
Cheers
Paul
Jim Moran wrote:
Subject: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
http://www.leedsunited.com/news/20121010/joint-statement-from-club-and-
gfh_2247585_2945358
Having read all the statements by LUST, they always seem to say what they
(we) want for Leeds in a correct way. They NEVER slag Bates off directly
and say things that they know for sure.
Gary Cooper (LUST) always speaks very well, when I've seen/heard him. He's
always dignified and never gets
I think the problem here is that GFH are only middle men and this is
exacerbated by the fact that they either don't have an end buyer for the
club or their previously agreed end buyer has gone cold on them for
whatever reason.
From day one GFH have been close to Bates. They both need each
Why is it we're so quick to accept the words of a serial liar and two
guys we've never heard of before, who have an obvious vested interest,
over an organised collective of fellow Leeds fans?
My reading of this statement is out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Like Bates, GFH have no money.
I reckon the LUST has never been right about any of the imminent
statements and all that. They ve set some expectations that were never
met. The LUST has been too chatty without substance.
At the same time I dont trust KB or the other bloke. I think KB asked
the other guy to release the
On 11/10/2012 09:28, Eric B wrote:
I reckon the LUST has never been right about any of the imminent
statements and all that. They ve set some expectations that were never
met. The LUST has been too chatty without substance.
This is what I understand LUST's position to be (a position with
On 11 October 2012 08:42, swin...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I think the problem here is that GFH are only middle men and this is
exacerbated by the fact that they either don't have an end buyer for the
club or their previously agreed end buyer has gone cold on them for
whatever reason.
Really? I
On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote:
Really? I thought they'd clarified this confusing point many times -
they are going to be the beneficial owners of LUFC are they not (despite
not having any money to buy us...)
I'd be very surprised if they did Andy - its not what GFH do. No I'm
sure
they are being
backed by others?
Regards
MOT
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:18:23 +0100
From: swin...@yahoo.co.uk
To: andyclayto...@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote:
Really? I thought they'd clarified
@gn.apc.orgleedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
I have to say that I remain confused and slightly annoyed about people who
continue to have a pop at LUST. I along with around 8,000 other fans have more
faith in LUST than I do in Bates and GFH are not doing themselves
be the owners although they are being
backed by others?
Regards
MOT
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:18:23 +0100
From: swin...@yahoo.co.uk
To: andyclayto...@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote:
Really? I
+0100
From: swin...@yahoo.co.uk
To: andyclayto...@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote:
Really? I thought they'd clarified this confusing point many times
-
they are going
Nice one. Lets not get in bed with GFH then eh?
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
Nice one. Lets not get in bed with GFH then eh?
you might have noticed, but we have absolutely zilch input into this
process whatsoever. LUST are trying to let us know what they know - Bates
and GFH are doing whatever the fuck they want with their assets (ie our
club) under the cloak of a
...@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote:
Really? I thought they'd clarified this confusing point many times -
they are going to be the beneficial owners of LUFC are they not (despite
not having any money
GFH.
Re the funding, I thought GFH would be the owners although they are being
backed by others?
Regards
MOT
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:18:23 +0100
From: swin...@yahoo.co.uk
To: andyclayto...@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop
http://www.leedsunited.com/news/20121010/joint-statement-from-club-and-gfh_2247585_2945358
Leeds United and GFH Capital have issued a joint-statement regarding the
on-going speculation surrounding the proposed investment in the football
club.
Following the latest bout of speculation, which
No they do not
GFH-C did.
Michael
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
http://www.myRay.org
--
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
For LUST to have lost credibility, that would imply they had it in the first
place?
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Oct 2012, at 22:20, Dr Michael Benjamin m...@myray.com wrote:
No they do not
GFH-C did.
Michael
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
Good point there!
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
http://www.myRay.org
--
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
Auditing || Quality
22 matches
Mail list logo
