Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

:leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe) Kicking them off? Well that’s ridiculous. Half the entertainment of this list is watching the two of them go back and forth, the sexual tension oozing from every binary digit.

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

You worry me-- sexual tension. Where's that coming from? -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Gardiner Sent: 27 October 2017 20:25 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>; Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com> Cc: 'Jeremy Thorpe' <jezz.tho...@zen.co.uk>; 'Richard Walker' <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) It may have esca

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Thorpe <jezz.tho...@zen.co.uk>; Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; Peter Castlehouse <dubca...@iinet.net.au>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Wow! My Dear Michael, I don't know what is more asto

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

Kicking them off? Well that’s ridiculous. Half the entertainment of this list is watching the two of them go back and forth, the sexual tension oozing from every binary digit. Michael A. Gardiner LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. GARDINER 110 West “A” Street, Suite 950 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone:

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

t;; 'Richard Walker' <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; 'Peter Castlehouse' <dubca...@iinet.net.au>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Friday, 27 October 2017, 13:45 Subject: RE: [LU] non LU......well, actually, t

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

e- > From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of > {broken-address} Richard Walker > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 07:59 > To: Peter Castlehouse; 'Michael Benjamin'; 'Rob Heath' > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......wel

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

.com>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017, 7:18 > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > Well, you have both prompted an admin response, after your non-LU rantings. > This has g

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

a...@iinet.net.au>>; Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com<mailto:m...@myray.com>>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk<mailto:rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (i

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

in <m...@myray.com<mailto:m...@myray.com>>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk<mailto:rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I second getting them bac

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

<m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' > <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes > responses, bloody hi

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

et.net.au>; Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes responses, bloody h

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

07:59 To: Peter Castlehouse; 'Michael Benjamin'; 'Rob Heath' Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) throwing people off the list even for Non-LU posts ? Most entertaining posts for a while from Mad MIke IMO. Get them back on. From

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Why would I, or anyone else want to buy a book written by you, when we see the sort of stuff you write on this list, abusive, insulting racist insults, that has gone on for years and years against a lad from Leeds. Mike has done more for this world than you will ever do. You should be ashamed

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Big Terry Boocock-Cameron huh? >> Shall we have a referendum on this folks? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John >> Boocock >> Sent: 26 October 2017 20:55 >> To: Chris Nickson <chrisni

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

eedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com> Sent: 26 October 2017 16:05 To: Graham White; Peter Castlehouse; ejwalsh Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I was infuriated by an act I de

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

.net.au>; ejwalsh <ejwa...@indigo.ie> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I know both have been guilty in the past, but what got me last night was that, as far as I could see

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

list [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John >> Boocock >> Sent: 26 October 2017 20:55 >> To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> >> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org >> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish)

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

>> |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt >> |Anderson >> |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM >> |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> >> |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org >> |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actual

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

ole...@hotmail.com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) [EXTERNAL] Matt was the instigator (harmlessly no doubt) Dr Mike responded to his email I believe: |-Original Message

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

ddress} Nicholas Armit; Peter Castlehouse; ejwalsh; Graham White; {broken-address} Graham White; Mark Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Matt was the instigator (harmlessly no doubt) Dr Mike responded to his email I b

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

; ejwalsh; Graham White; {broken-address} Graham White; Mark Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Matt was the instigator (harmlessly no doubt) Dr Mike responded to his email I believe: |-Original Message

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Message- |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt |Anderson |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) | |Just n

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

s.edu.hk> > |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > | > |Just noticed big order coming in from Israel On Thursday, October 26, 2017, 10:50:36 AM EDT, Mark <wiscole...@hotmail.com> wrote: Agree, I didn't

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

It was all very odd wasn't it? As far as I can see, Rob had a little poke at his old sparring partner with a fairly harmless (though probably ill-advised) joke about receiving book orders from Israel. Then all hell broke loose from Dr Mike, who talked about emails from Rob that suggest him

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

holas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 9:05:29 AM To: Peter Castlehouse; ejwalsh; Graham White; {broken-address} Graham White Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Looked t

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

> To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you > all vote on that after implementation

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

nt: 26 October 2017 20:55 > To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you > a

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you > all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here of > cours

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

.@gmail.com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point..LU > (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let > you all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here > of

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here of

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Boocock <j...@boocock.net> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) ​Will it be a binding referendum? And if they want to resub, who will be in charge of negotiations? Will there be a transition period? ​ On 26 October 2017 at 10:44

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here of course) Big Terry On 26/10/2017 10:49, Chris Nickson wrote: ​Will it be a binding referendum? And if they want to resub, who will be in

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

​Will it be a binding referendum? And if they want to resub, who will be in charge of negotiations? Will there be a transition period? ​ On 26 October 2017 at 10:44, John Boocock wrote: > Bloody hell I've only just seen all this because I too was playing Bridge > (some of

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

On it now Betty, will post the link in five minutes Pete -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John Boocock Sent: 26 October 2017 20:45 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Bloody hell I've only just seen all this because I too was playing Bridge (some of this is true) I think we should have a list referendum as to whether we should re sub them. Anyone able to set up a poll site Dr Mike Yes  / No, Rob Heath Yes / No? Theresa Boocock-Cameron Esq On

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 26 October 2017 17:59 To: Peter Castlehouse <dubca...@iinet.net.au>; 'Michael Benjamin' <m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) throwing people off the

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

rg Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017, 7:18 Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Well, you have both prompted an admin response, after your non-LU rantings. This has gone too far, in every aspect, and is not good protocol in anyone's eyes. Rob and Michae

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

October 2017 17:05 To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Rob, I am going to get both of us thrown out. You know fine well just what you did. You pour over every post. Stop pissiing around. Why y

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

dslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) Rob, I am going to get both of us thrown out. You know fine well just what you did. You pour over every post. Stop pissiing around. Why you even bother beats me. Time after time you are told—leave Isre

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

derson <m...@leeds-united.net>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Has anybody got any clue what this lunatic is burbling on about? I think he's finally cracked. Physician, heal thyself. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Mich

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

t Anderson <m...@leeds-united.net> > *Cc:* Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org > > *Subject:* Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU > (ish) > > > > Re the strange contribution from Dr. Bizarro... > > > &g

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

eds-united.net> Cc: Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Re the strange contribution from Dr. Bizarro... He seems to have invented some imagined insult that absolutely doe

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

ilto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt > > |Anderson > > |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM > > |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> > > |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > > |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

rson > |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM > |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> > |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > | > |Just noticed big order coming in from Israel > | >

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

oes keep me amused at times though) > Dave > > From: Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com> > To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017, 21:17 > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point..LU > (ish) &

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

s List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017, 21:17 Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I was just thinking "Wow, that escalated quickly!" Nigel (the Dublin one) -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedsl

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) Wow, just got back from playing bridge, having a few drinks, and an excellent Italian meal at Angelos (if you are ever in Port de Pollenca give it a try - only open during the season) and I see this. OK

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

; Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 10:55:40 PM To: Matt Anderson; Rob Heath; Michael Benjamin Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) Wow, just got back from playing bridge, having a few drinks, and an excellent Italian meal at Angelos (

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

ne CBT |-Original Message- |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt |Anderson |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point.

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

[mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt |Anderson |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) | |Just noticed big order coming in from Israel |

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

s <ni...@sykesonline.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Brilliant book...finished it recently. Better than Morrisseys. Marr comes across as a really decent guy I thought. -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mail

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

To: Nigel Sykes; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I would do but I have to finish Johnny Marr's book which was bought for me last Christmas - I'm on page 52. From: Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com> To: leedslist@gn.a

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

....LU (ish) Oh, go on then... Nigel (the Dublin one) -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Rob Heath Sent: 25 October 2017 08:57 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) Boys &

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Oh, go on then... Nigel (the Dublin one) -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Rob Heath Sent: 25 October 2017 08:57 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Boys & G

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Just noticed big order coming in from Israel Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Oct 2017, at 08:57, Rob Heath wrote: > > Boys & Girls.. > > A few months back, I notified this list of the publication of my first > novel. I told you all that there was a little bit of an

[LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Boys & Girls.. A few months back, I notified this list of the publication of my first novel. I told you all that there was a little bit of an LUFC connection in there. I thought that, plus list loyalty, would be enough to persuade you all to buy it. However, in the intervening period, I