I tend to be a lurker here on the Legacy Board. I have a 1200.
If you decide to download GIMP be sure to go to www.gimp.org to obtain
it. The current version is 2.8.10
It you merely go to Google or Bing and type gimp then you will have a
lot of links that look official but that will download
Thomas,
GREAT hearing from a lurker - and THANK YOU for the tip on Gimp - I know we
ALL appreciate the info - helps to keep us safe online.
I normally don't chime in with a Thanks( Please assume all Group Members ARE
thankful).
My primary reason for this note is to inform (or remind) you of
They sound like the main drive and standard duplex gear for the old woodchuck
model (MA-12). Yes Legacy made a change to the gear count during the middle of
the model 900's. I don't know why, I could only guess that reduced tooth count
on the newer machines (larger teeth) decreased
Neat Don.
Thank you.
C.A.G.
- Original Message -
Here's another way to deal with distracting background, but this time we're
going to place the image in a different setting.
We're still using the free GIMP program and a very simple method to get the
effect.
I use a photo I took
Did this chuck work? I can't find it on Grizzly's site. What's the part
number or link? My only concern is what's the swing of the whole piece and
does it need a drawbar to stay in place? The legacy is not designed to pound a
2mt object into the headstock. You have to be nice to the socket
Found it on Grizzly's site. Are you sure it has a #2MT?
-Tim
- Original Message -
From: Tim Krause
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: time for a question or two..
Did this chuck work? I can't find it on
here's an update tim...got the chuck today, a day later than i
anticipated...the idea is to get a 6 faceplate(here monday) with a 1-8
thread...screw the faceplate onto the headstock...also setting up a 1
shaft collar so the faceplate can never unscrew when in use...this will be
welded to the
16lbs is a lot of extra weight, but your headstock can easily take it. I don't
like the idea that it's unbalanced. Grinding away a $200 fixture really makes
my mind go crazy. I would think you could fabricate something much smaller in
your shop. In fact it's something I've given quite a
i like the idea you came up with...never would have thought to back out
the tailstock!...that is slick...going to ponder that a bit...also forgot
to mention what a help it is to have so many extra parts from the second
legacy machine...all the work i am doing now i am doing on my bench since i
thanks for the input guys...sounds logical to me...i'll just put those
gears with the woodchuck as i have them already on the later legacy
machine...joe
On Friday, May 16, 2014 6:50:50 PM UTC-4, Curtis wrote:
Hello everyone.
Tim on my 1000 It came with the old small teeth on my gears, and a
Now that’s a neat idea Tim you could have different plates with different
numbers of holes for different indexes.
Bill
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
[mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim Krause
Sent: Saturday, 17 May 2014 11:34 AM
To:
A long time ago I made this file that covers what is in the design kit. It is
for the groups benefit. I'd assume not what Bill is looking for but
interesting.
-Tim
- Original Message -
From: mwfos...@earthlink.net
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday,
12 matches
Mail list logo
