Thanks for the honorable mention Bill :>) I'm big on making things
multi-taskers.
The only significant difference between the 1800 and the 1200 is the 2' in
length. I think the shorter version fits in my small shop (720 sq ft)
better. I always thought the 900 (at 4') was a great size for
I like russes sort of idea mount a top on the legacy and use it as your work
bench when not being used ,that way its not the legacy that goes but the work
bench to get more room in a small shop
Bill
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Tim,Thanks - someone will appreciate it. I'm going to save/file this and hold - in case I ever need a 19-hole index plate.For "accuracy" purposes, can you tell us what some of the key (critical) measurements should be. A number of the printers & copier/printers out there do not necessarily
Here's a template for an index plate that has 19 holes. The time spent
was trivial.
-Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Legacy
Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Agree, don’t see much of an advantage in the vertical position, space appears
to be a major problem with most unless the Legacy is all you own and tinker
with, I even lent mine to a regional Woodturners Club who never used it despite
me demonstrating making several ornate walking staffs so its
Mike, I knew you would be using crank handle method. My first thought is to
simply make a 19 hole index plate. Those prime numbers really throw things
off. In my mind I multiplied 19 x 2 to equal a 38" pitch. Then you could
figure out the number of cranks. Ah, but then we have a new
a complicated but clean design goodonya! cheers Tom
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Love to turn in Oregon
wrote:
> The corner pieces: I wasn’t sure of the best way to proceed at first.
> Rather than gluing to whole pieces to create the bland for the entire
> round, I