Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Laura Schumacker
All...  Thanks for all of the feedback.  I am currently entering into Legacy estimated dates, using est to distiguish these dates, however, I did not begin doing this until recently and I have over 5,000 indivduals in my family file that I now want to go back an estimate missing dates.  From the fe

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship to Father/Relationship to Mother

2006-10-16 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
This is the way many societies have called the various relationships. If it is confusing, you can changed to what makes sense to you. I have. Rich --- Patricia Hickin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was unable to keep up with Legacy emails for a > while and just found this > discussion about chil

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Question

2006-10-16 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
The Draft records, (and census) were created by the US government. Various companies have since created transcripts and photo copies of the various documents. How you record the various sources of these is a personal choice. This also is confused by the REPOSITORY name. Hope this helps. Rich --- E

Re: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship to Father/Relationship to Mother

2006-10-16 Thread fredlindsay
Pat: On the parents family view, click on View -> Children List ->Relation to Father. You can then 'Add' whatever term you would like upto 50 characters. The addition will also be added to the Relation to Mother list. I hope this meets your needs. Fred Lindsay =

Re: [LegacyUG] Never married and no children option

2006-10-16 Thread Cathy
Hi Patricia, This is partly because of the evolution of the program and partly due to the way the database works. On the individual screen it used to have: "This individual never married." The wording was changed as it always meant "This individual had no children AND didn't marry." That is -

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
For these dates I have created a source called 'My guesses'. Because in IGI and also British nobility records, etc. 'about' is frequentlynfound. I differentiate between my guesses and others. Rich --- Laura Schumacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. I understand there are >

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship to Father/Relationship to Mother

2006-10-16 Thread Susan Daily
Pat, If you are on the parents family view, and click on View -> Children List, you will see the children listed, and at the bottom is the "Relationship to Father" etc. - this is where you find the Natural term. Thanks for sharing your experience with the use of the word Natural. Something to thi

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Question

2006-10-16 Thread Susan Daily
Elaine, I add all that "extra" information into the Master Source publication detail. My Master Source reads simply World War I Draft Card. I take their source citation (that you quoted) and add it to the Source Detail, but I like to add the name I found in the index and the year of birth so I kno

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Question

2006-10-16 Thread Jim Terry
Elaine, To be specific, here is how I source Ancestry's WWI draft card database: Ancestry.com. World War I Draft Registration Cards, 1917-1918 [database and images on-line]. (Provo, UT, USA: MyFamily.com, Inc., 2005. Original data: United States, Selective Service System. World War I Selective

Re: [LegacyUG] Ancestor Book

2006-10-16 Thread Cathy
Hi Diane, Currently Legacy only offers endnotes for sources in Book and other Reports. The ability to have them as footnotes on the appropriate page is often requested. You could add your voice by putting in a Suggestion - see Legacy Home Tab for the link. I think Ron may be referring to Web

[LegacyUG] sources

2006-10-16 Thread Janis Gilmore
For my census sources I have combined what is presented on the TMG sources videos with what is provided on the ProGenealogist website: http://www.progenealogists.com/commoncitations.htm   I find that the combination of the two results in sources that print very close to the Mills standard, te

[LegacyUG] Never married and no children option

2006-10-16 Thread Patricia Hickin
At the bottom of the Individual Edit screen this sentence appears, with a box to check in front of it: "This individual never married and had no children." Why are these two facts linked together without any other option? Why not two sentences: "This individual never married." "This individual

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship to Father/Relationship to Mother

2006-10-16 Thread Patricia Hickin
I was unable to keep up with Legacy emails for a while and just found this discussion about children with a "natural" relationship to their parents. Historically a "natural" child was one born out of wedlock. E.g., ___ Llewellyn married a natural [i.e., illegitimate] daughter of King John. I ha

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Question

2006-10-16 Thread Dawn Crowley
I record where I found a source. If I accessed a census online, then I list that website. This method differs from what Ms. Mills would prefer in her "Evidence" book, but it works for me. I want to know where I found something in case I need to return to that source. I don't necessarily nee

RE: [LegacyUG] Location in brackets. Why?

2006-10-16 Thread Cathy
Good morning Peter on a sunny morning with the Warriors doing well (in the cricket for you non West Aussies), Legacy doesn't make up or suggest data for you. If it isn't in the obvious field, then perhaps the database indexes have got corrupted. The solution to that is to do a File > File Main

Re: [LegacyUG] Location in brackets. Why?

2006-10-16 Thread Jenny M Benson
Peter Holmes wrote I've read what you say, but I'm still confused in 3 ways. Firstly, on the ones that I've looked at there is nothing entered in the + (address) areas, Secondly, I've not been aware of that facility and have never inserted anything there. Can't say why your locations are b

[LegacyUG] Source Question

2006-10-16 Thread Elaine O'Neill
I have a question on Sources, but it doesn't pertain ONLY to Legacy, but Sources in general. If I'm asking in the wrong place, I apologize. I want to be as thorough as possible with my sources, just for my own information in case I have to go back later to check any data. I'm from the old pen an

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Myrna Jorgensen
Hi Laura,     Everyone has their own way of doing things and this is mine.   When I receive information from others (internet, friends, etc.) and they have tried to come close to a date of an event they will usually say "abt" or "ca." I will put my best 'guesstimate' as "est" so that I know

[LegacyUG] Sugestions Please - Legacy Deluxe 6 DB 1850/1860 U.S. Slave Census schedules

2006-10-16 Thread Debbie Freeman
Hello Legacy Users, I would appreciate any suggestions you could give before I start this project. I am starting a surname association project. The project is a database of people listed in the 1850 and 1860 United States Federal Slave census schedule (owners, and slaves). I would appreci

Re: [LegacyUG] Ancestor Book

2006-10-16 Thread ronald ferguson
Diane, I very much doubt it as I cannot see how a computer could work out what an appropriate page is. It is not like a Pedigree Page where it is clear or even family groups (although I don't know if Legacy can put them at the bottom of those groups). Ron Ferguson _

Re: [LegacyUG] Ancestor Book

2006-10-16 Thread Diane Murach
When making an Ancestor Book, is it possible to request the source citation be placed at the bottom of the appropriate page? I've been searching, but haven't found a way to do it? Diane Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find p

RE: [LegacyUG] Location in brackets. Why?

2006-10-16 Thread Glen Ballard
Peter, On the 3rd item: >Why / When would anyone also insert details of an address when there's a location shown? The location is not the address. Locations are to consist of items such as "City, County, State, Country." This does not include the physical location address. For an example, un

RE: [LegacyUG] Location in brackets. Why?

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Holmes
Jenny, I've read what you say, but I'm still confused in 3 ways. Firstly, on the ones that I've looked at there is nothing entered in the + (address) areas, Secondly, I've not been aware of that facility and have never inserted anything there. Thirdly, why /when would anyone also insert details

RE: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Cary
I use Abt for when sources give an approximate date and use an “Estimated Birth” Event for ones I make up so as to make research easier.  Date, location & description in that event are my best guesses, notes say why.  On some it’s “Total guess based on generation”.  You can switch such an e

Re: [LegacyUG] Location in brackets. Why?

2006-10-16 Thread Jenny M Benson
Peter Holmes wrote I've just been looking at (some) of the incidences of the method of display & I wonder if it could have something to do withy the fact that I've NOT displayed a location for the birth but have shown something for baptism/christening. (If I click the down arrow for the death f

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Nicholas Cirillo
Laura, This is not in the thread but I'm very interested in how you exported your family file to Excel. Did you send the entire file or just the name? Could you give a step-by-step instruction for this. I have done similar but strictly by hand. Thanks, Nick Cirillo, Fairfax VALaura Schumacker <[E

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread ronald ferguson
Not crazy, although I guess it can make one that way ;-). It something I suppose we all do from time to time, in fact I am currently going through ww1 records myself. The way I tackle this is to use Search>Find to get to those who could have served and then work through them family by family to

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Laura Schumacker
Thanks for the feedback.  I understand there are risks in estimating dates in my family file, but the reason I want to do this is that I am at a point that I have hit a brick wall (or so it seems).  So what I have done is exported my family file to an excel file and have added columns named WWI, WW

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread ronald ferguson
Cathy, We use pretty much the same system except I use Abt for, say, dob calculated from a census or similar - generally it means to me =/- 6 to 12 months and Cir for BMD's. I don't use "Q" either so for the 1st quarter it would read Cir Mar 1917. Sorry if I confused by mixing "calculated" and

RE: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread ronald ferguson
Bill, No it's not! Ron Ferguson _ For Genealogy, Software and Social visit: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ *New Blogs: The Murder of Adam Mather; Legacy Searches* Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://myweb

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Cathy
A calculated date to me is different from an estimated date. You may estimate a date on assumptions such as those give by Ronald. You can calculate a birth date, for example, from the date given at death or in a census. I use Cal for dates like these. I use Abt for approximate dates given by re

RE: [LegacyUG] Location in brackets. Why?

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Holmes
G'day from (somewhere else in) WA (Cathy), I've just been looking at (some) of the incidences of the method of display & I wonder if it could have something to do withy the fact that I've NOT displayed a location for the birth but have shown something for baptism/christening. (If I click the down

Re: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread Jenny M Benson
ronald ferguson wrote Personally, I don't use calculated dates in my data although, obviously, I need to estimate these when looking for bmd information etc. Generally you will find that a man is 3 to 5 years older than his spouse and a couple marry around 2 years before their first child is b

RE: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread William Anderson
Ron, Laura, I'm originally from farming stock and it was fairly common in the rural areas for the marriage not to take place until the 'woman' had proved herself fertile. So be prepared for births before and very shortly after marriage. [Or maybe that's just my family!!] Bill -Original Mess

RE: [LegacyUG] Estimating Dates

2006-10-16 Thread ronald ferguson
Lauara, You will have to work out the estimated dates for yourself. You will find that Family Search and other sources use angle brackets around a date to indicate calculated data so this method is, perhaps, best avoided to make it clear which are *your* calculations. Legacy allows the use of