After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled 774 Individuals
But the Surname Page in the set says This site contains 650 Individuals ...
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines:
I am just updating my site and did not notice this difference. However, I have
checked the total number of pages produced against the total numbers of records
in my .fdb file and these are in agreement.
It would seem, therefore, that although the figures may be wrong during the
creation of
Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
6. so I don't have the new include invisible.
I do have a lot of Private Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
How would I test this? Can't figure out how to Search a Focus Group
for Private Individuals.
Regards
Mary
Mary,
Are you having a bad hair day ? :-)
SearchFindDetailed Search
Individual; Private; Equals; Private.
I am not certain as to whether, in V6, the total number of persons found is
given in the list of people found (it's in the description bar in V7).
The total number of individuals given
Ron and Evert
Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
I need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web pages.
Probably a bad hair day - or I'd be able to figure it out :-)
Mary
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Mary,
As above and then add a second search AND Individual; Tag No; Equal To;
Tagged; where Tag No is the tag for your Focus Group.
Ron Ferguson
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
Hi everyone,
Just interested to see what people do here. What information would people
put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template if the
information is found online at ancestry.com?
1851? It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in putting it
twice?
2005?
David,
There is no way I would put in all that stuff from Ancestry!!
I have actually put in 1851 - I must been rather keen that day as I have put
the actual date of the census in the recorded date. The 1851 to which you
refer actually only appears in the Bibliography and I agree it is a bit
Melanie,
I may be missing the point, but you could still use the residence
event, but where it asks for date put in something like From 1877 to
1878 (without the quotes). would that work for you?
Dermot.
Eleanor Roosevelt - Women are like teabags. We don't know our true
strength until we are
I also get a similar discrepancy, but I believe that you can account for
this totally with the number of AKA's and married surnames
As others have said, the actual number of pages created is correct
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mary Young wrote:
After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled 774 Individuals
But the Surname Page in the set says This site contains 650 Individuals ...
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young
If you stop and think about it, the program must
music-line wrote
Just interested to see what people do here. What information would
people put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template
if the information is found online at ancestry.com?
1851? It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in
putting it twice?
ronald ferguson wrote
There is no way I would put in all that stuff from Ancestry!!
As you will see elsewhere in this thread, I do! (For the reasons I have
given.)
Ancestry is the repository and not the source.
I agree with you, but Ancestry is publishing the Census and handy
hint for
The original source is National Archives HO107 (HO stands for Home Office)
and the class is England and Wales Census for 1851 (not just England). There
are many organisations who have transcribed the images, but the original
image production was done by the National Archives in the days when it
David,
The published date field for an online source is reserved for the year when
the document/database was initially published if you can locate that
information. For Ancestry.com databases, it is always available in their
citation.
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL
I need some counsel from learned Legacy users. My brother and I are
maintaining our family genealogical files using Legacy 7. Each of us makes
entries into our individual Legacy file as we obtain new information. Each
of us has about 6,600 individuals in our files. We know that most of the
Dave:
Use the intellimerge feature...after you have decided which of you
will be thekeeper of the file.If were to be you, you would need to
keep a master file that you merged your changes to prior to
emailing it to your brother for him to work on. Periodically, he
would email the file back to
Dave Johnson wrote:
I need some counsel from learned Legacy users. My brother and I are
maintaining our family genealogical files using Legacy 7. Each of us
makes entries into our individual Legacy file as we obtain new
information. Each of us has about 6,600 individuals in our files. We
Hi, How about 'relocation'?
Sandra V
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe:
Say What?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Herson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aother idiotic programming scrweup in Legacy.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
You are not mentioning the unknowns that maybe created for the webpage that the
program doesn't need to be filled for screen stuff. I am only guessing.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jack Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jack Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Web
Redundancy is not evil. The disk space used by the 4 characters is made up for
by the 'fact' it is appearing somewhere in whichever report you use, without
retyping. In the past, I used abbreviations to save disk space usage, I learned
and changed my ways.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 9/30/08,
RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote
Redundancy is not evil. The disk space used by the 4 characters is made
up for by the 'fact' it is appearing somewhere in whichever report you
use, without retyping. In the past, I used abbreviations to save disk
space usage, I learned and changed my ways.
Richard,
Ron wrote
As above and then add a second search AND Individual; Tag No; Equal To;
Tagged; where Tag No is the tag for your Focus Group.
Ah, well ... how do I tag my Focus Group?
(Sorry about this ... brain not up to par today)
Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Mary,
You're not having a good day are you - so cheer up, have a half and a good kip
:-).
SearchFindMiscellaneous at the top left.
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Thanks Ron
Thanks for the instructions. It's easy when you know how:-)
Result (as you said) The total number of individuals given in the
Surnames list excludes Private,
I guess that makes sense in a way, and has nothing to do with AKAs or
married names etc.
Off to have the half and the kip!
Mary
My bad. I misread the question to being about avoiding multiple inputting of
data.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in
the the Master
Thanks to all for the useful replies. I like Jenny's idea of putting the
'long blurb' in the text tab of the Mastet Scource.
Best wishes
David
*
David S Brookes
Musical Director, The Brewood Singers
www.brewoodsingers.co.uk
Organist
28 matches
Mail list logo
