Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread Kris
Hi, Ron -- Yes, I know about that one. :-) On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:05:42 -0500, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kris, Do you know that you can globally set the definitely deceased? See Tools>Set Living. This will also change ggrandparents etc with no date of birth. By de

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread ronald ferguson
fergys/ _ > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:23:40 -0500 > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks, Ron -- Now that I've been play

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread Kris
England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:59:56 -0500 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Ron -- I know about marking people

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread ronald ferguson
cyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, Ron -- I know about marking people "private" but I was hoping for > something more streamlined than doing them one by one. Maybe I can do a > search/tag and mark the se

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread Kris
England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:09:37 -0500 I know it's possible to supress details for living people and change

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread ronald ferguson
p://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:09:37 -0500 > > I know it's possible to supress details for living peopl

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread Martin Briscoe
inal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris > Sent: 23 April 2008 14:10 > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People > > I know it's possible to supress details for living peop

[LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export -- Living People

2008-04-23 Thread Kris
I know it's possible to supress details for living people and change their name to "living." Is it possible to just not export anything about them at all by clicking a box, or can this only be done by search/tag? Thanks, Kris Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/E

RE: [LegacyUG] Gedcom Export

2008-03-19 Thread Mark Lang
ent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 4:43 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] Gedcom Export > > Legacy 6.0.0.190 > > I've been exporting tagged individuals to a Gedcom so I can then import > them into an ALL_IN-ONE-CHART so I compare graphical the

[LegacyUG] Gedcom Export

2008-03-19 Thread John Magyari
Legacy 6.0.0.190 I've been exporting tagged individuals to a Gedcom so I can then import them into an ALL_IN-ONE-CHART so I compare graphical the selected changes I've made to my database. Here's the issue below Everytime I select File -> Export To -> Gedcom all the previous settings I sele

[LegacyUG] Gedcom Export

2007-09-12 Thread hwatman
I just tried adding URL event to a few people with myspace pages.? After a few failed attempts to review the results on my TNG site I discovered that the URL event is not exported.? The customize list for the export function does not include the URL event and several others in the options to be

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-29 Thread ronald ferguson
ED]> Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:30:49 +0100 Jenny, As I am sure you know a Gedcom is for the exchange of data only and for the exchange of formatting it is a standardised

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-29 Thread ronald ferguson
d See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ From: Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Event

SV: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-29 Thread Kirsten vermehren
All ok -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Kirsten vermehren Sendt: 29. juni 2007 12:01 Til: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Emne: SV: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events ALL OK. -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED

SV: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-29 Thread Kirsten vermehren
ALL OK. -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Jenny M Benson Sendt: 29. juni 2007 10:51 Til: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Emne: Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events ronald ferguson wrote >The Legacy wording is specific to Leg

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-29 Thread Jenny M Benson
ronald ferguson wrote The Legacy wording is specific to Legacy. With a Gedcom WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) This is the nature of the Gedcom format and is independant of Legacy or Rootsweb. As I read it, Susan was saying that the Event Description appeared as 1 EVEN and the Event (ti

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-29 Thread ronald ferguson
/ _ From: "Susan Daily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com To: LegacyUserGroup Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:10:56 -0500 I was looking at my GEDCOM at Rootsweb today and noticed something

[LegacyUG] GEDCOM export of Events

2007-06-28 Thread Susan Daily
I was looking at my GEDCOM at Rootsweb today and noticed something odd with the way Legacy exports events. This is how it looks on Rootsweb: Event: aboard the S.S. Canada Travel 16 Sep 1898 Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, USA This is how it is worded in a Legacy report: She traveled aboard the S

Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom Export

2007-04-26 Thread Brian/Support
Roger, Yes there is. The setting though is not in the GEDCOM Export screen. Go to Options > Customize > General In the LDS area select the option there on how you want Temple Names set up. That option will then be used for the temple name when you export to a GEDCOM. Brian Customer Support M

[LegacyUG] Gedcom Export

2007-04-12 Thread Roger W. Wells
Is there a way to export the complete temple name rather than just the 5 letter abbreviation? Thanks Roger Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 features not found in the Standard Edition. Learn more about these features at http://legacyfamilytree.com/DeluxeEdit

Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export when using alternate wording of events

2006-12-14 Thread Susan Daily
individual screens to include these details in reports. Ron Ferguson > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:03:31 -0600 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export when using a

RE: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export when using alternate wording of events

2006-12-14 Thread ronald ferguson
mshaw/ __ > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:03:31 -0600 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export when using alternate wording of events > > I just went and took a look

[LegacyUG] Gedcom export when using alternate wording of events

2006-12-13 Thread Susan Daily
I just went and took a look at my WorldConnect tree on Rootsweb.com and was disturbed that all of my event sentence override constructions are appearing, for example: "Event: National Army Military Service 27 May 1918 Toledo, Lucas, Ohio, USA _OVER: [HeShe] enlisted in the [Desc] [onDate] [inPlac

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-06 Thread Brian/Support
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arnold Sprague Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 6:11 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug??? When I do a GEDCOM Export and (1) enter a change in the Customize option to Exclude

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread ronald ferguson
com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug??? Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:42:41 -0600 At 10:13 AM 11/5/2006, you wrote: Each option for producing the gedcom has its own selection of items to export. Set the Produce File For option first then change the cus

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread Arnold Sprague
11 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug??? When I do a GEDCOM Export and (1) enter a change in the Customize option to Exclude Regular Notes From Export and *then* (2) change the Produce File For option from "Legacy" to "GEDCOM 5

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread Sherry/Support
ondence. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arnold Sprague Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 6:11 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug??? When I do a GEDCOM Export and (1) enter a change i

Re: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread Dave Naylor
On 5 Nov 2006 Arnold Sprague wrote: > When I do a GEDCOM Export and (1) enter a change in the Customize > option to Exclude Regular Notes From Export and *then* (2) change the > Produce File For option from "Legacy" to "GEDCOM 5.5 Only," it turns > out that my choice to EXCLUDE REGULAR NOTES is b

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread Arnold Sprague
Yes. Arnold Sprague At 09:24 AM 11/5/2006, you wrote: Have you tried changing the order of 1) and 2)? Ron Ferguson From: Arnold Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A s

RE: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread ronald ferguson
Grimshaw http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/ __ From: Arnold Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A s

[LegacyUG] GEDCOM Export - A serious bug???

2006-11-05 Thread Arnold Sprague
When I do a GEDCOM Export and (1) enter a change in the Customize option to Exclude Regular Notes From Export and *then* (2) change the Produce File For option from "Legacy" to "GEDCOM 5.5 Only," it turns out that my choice to EXCLUDE REGULAR NOTES is blown away. This is repeatable. Regular Not

RE: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export

2006-09-20 Thread Jennifer Crockett
: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export Melanie, You can open up your GEDCOM file that you exported from Legacy with a text editor program (Notepad, Word, etc.) See if you can find that phrase in the GEDCOM anywhere. If you find it, please post the results here and

Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export

2006-09-20 Thread Melanie Armstrong
Susan, Thanks. Melanie Armstrong --- Susan Daily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Melanie, > You can open up your GEDCOM file that you exported > from Legacy with a > text editor program (Notepad, Word, etc.) See if you > can find that > phrase in the GEDCOM anywhere. If you find

Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom export

2006-09-20 Thread Susan Daily
Melanie, You can open up your GEDCOM file that you exported from Legacy with a text editor program (Notepad, Word, etc.) See if you can find that phrase in the GEDCOM anywhere. If you find it, please post the results here and we'll try to pinpoint this further if it is caused by Legacy, rather tha

[LegacyUG] Gedcom export

2006-09-16 Thread Melanie Armstrong
Can anyone tell me what could be causing this problem? When I export my file to Rootsweb some of the individuals in my file have "See attached sources" in the General notes field. When I check my original file there is no such notation in the file. Is anyone else having this problem?