- Original Message -
From: Maureen Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 4:11 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources
Elizabeth wrote: ...I'll now sit back and wait for the backlash
Gary wrote: ..Forcing that researcher to spend time and money obtain
their own copy of every document I have located over decades of searching
does nothing to extend the lines.
Gary I agree with all you have said. I should have mentioned that I was not
into pure genealogy - just the
From: Maureen Chambers
Also I think we are truly selling our descendants rather short by
underestimating their ability to pick up where we have left off. If we
are managing, I'm sure they will be more than capable of doing so,
especially with the advances in electronic technology.
As a
: Friday, 29 February 2008 7:09 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources
I would simplify the search into three categories: (1) search for
deaths after 1857. If you get a list drawn up, then search criteria (2)
and if successful, then add
Elizabeth wrote: ...I'll now sit back and wait for the backlash . . . . !
No argument from me Elizabeth - I agree with you. While each of us may have
different ideas on how and what and how much etc to record in the source
fields, I feel that it is just as important for future individuals to
5 matches
Mail list logo