RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-03 Thread Brian Beddor
://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:10:55 -0500 From: bbed...@japsolson.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Hi Ron, Thanks

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-03 Thread Brian Beddor
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Brian: As Ron said, there are many different ways of using Legacy and it takes time plus trial and error to develop your own methods. For example, I don't use Events at all but I'm *huge* on source notes. With data conflicts I'd

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread ronald ferguson
Brian, Like many aspects of Legacy there is no right or wrong way of doing things (this also applies to your other email) and my best advice is to do that which is most comfortable for yourself. You can create your own Events should you wish, for Events see ViewMaster ListsEvent

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread Geoff Rasmussen
Hi Brian, I actually change the Alt Birth event to Disproven Birth. I don't add a new one. Then in that event's notes, I explain why I'm disproving it. For me, it's important to keep the Disproven Birth event in case I need it for research comparisons in the future. I also keep it in case other

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread Brian Beddor
...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of ronald ferguson Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:19 PM To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Brian, Like many aspects of Legacy there is no right or wrong way of doing things (this also

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread ronald ferguson
/ _ Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:10:55 -0500 From: bbed...@japsolson.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Hi Ron, Thanks for the feedback

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread Brian Beddor
...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Geoff Rasmussen Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:15 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Hi Brian, I actually change the Alt Birth event to Disproven Birth. I don't add a new one. Then in that event's notes, I

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Brian: As Ron said, there are many different ways of using Legacy and it takes time plus trial and error to develop your own methods. For example, I don't use Events at all but I'm *huge* on source notes. With data conflicts I'd create a source citation to be attached to the appropriate field,

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread Angela Gabbard
] On Behalf Of Brian Beddor Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:11 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Hi Ron, Thanks for the feedback. While I understand there might not be a right or wrong way of doing these things, I wasn't sure if there were better

RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth?

2009-04-02 Thread Geoff Rasmussen
Beddor Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:47 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Disproven Birth? Hi Geoff, It is an honor to meet you after watching so many of your videos! Thanks for the information and correcting my misunderstanding. I like the idea of marking