@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus
[WifeMarriedSurname]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44 -0500
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden
name
should appear between the given names and the married surname,
enclosed in
parentheses, although
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hope Bagot Bees
Sent: 22-Jan-08 5:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
I agree with Ron entirely - I've
: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Hmmm.. I've never seen née Maiden Name use between the woman's given
name and married surname.
Shouldn't it be Children of Seth and Irene ANDREWS (née SIMONSON) ?
- Original Message
From: Bill Bienia [EMAIL
]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44 -0500
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
should appear between the given names and the married surname, enclosed
Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:47:44 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
should appear between the given names
]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44 -0500
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
should appear between the given names and the married surname, enclosed
] On Behalf Of Bill Bienia
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:48 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
should appear between the given names
Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
Was the event created in Marriage Events or Individual Events? I would
think it cannot work in Individual Events because the program would
not know which marriage to take the surname from. At least a Marriage
Event would
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
Was the event created in Marriage Events or Individual Events? I would
think it cannot work in Individual Events because
21, 2008 6:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
Was the event created in Marriage Events or Individual Events? I would
think
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
Was the event created in Marriage Events or Individual Events? I would
think it cannot work in Individual Events because the program would
not know
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Hi Gary,
The Help file clearly states that these codes ONLY work in the
Marriage Events. There is an enhancement request in, I believe, to
add Marriage events to Individual reports. How
of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44
Hi Mary,
Exactly. :-) If I were wanting all the Marriage information I'd be
looking at a Family Group Sheet. I hardly ever use them either ;-) .
I only use them for sharing one family or showing what information I
have on one family so a family member can correct or add.
However, other
Gary,
I was just setting something like this up this afternoon, where I wanted the
sentence to read (using your name examples):
Children of Seth and Irene (née SIMONSON) ANDREWS were:
I ended up using:
Children of [HusbFirstName] and [WifeFirstName] (née [WifeSurname])
[HusbSurname] were:
This
Bill Bienia wrote:
Gary,
I was just setting something like this up this afternoon, where I wanted the
sentence to read (using your name examples):
Children of Seth and Irene (née SIMONSON) ANDREWS were:
I ended up using:
Children of [HusbFirstName] and [WifeFirstName] (née [WifeSurname])
Hi Gary,
I've never noticed the code [WifeMarriedSurname] or
[HusbMarriedSurname] before. Probably shows how long it is since I've
edited an Event Sentence Definitions or at least had to look up a
code to do it.
I suspect it is something in the pipeline and not fully implemented
yet as
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Gary,
I was just setting something like this up this afternoon, where I wanted the
sentence to read (using your name examples):
Children of Seth and Irene (née SIMONSON) ANDREWS were:
I ended up using:
Children
18 matches
Mail list logo
