RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

> I have been very quiet while all of this discussion has been going on >over bloodlines verses homosexual relationships. That was working for me. # This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Co

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

rday, September 08, 2007 6:39 PM To: Evan Henderson; LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries I have been very quiet while all of this discussion has been going on over bloodlines No virus found in this outgoing mes

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Jesus died for their > sins as well as yours. > Or are you hiding in a whale as Jonah did. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Darlene & > Don Hicks > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:16 PM > To: LegacyUse

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Evan Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Sent: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 8:39 pm > Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] > Homosexual Entries > > > > I have been very qui

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Sat, 8 Sep 2007 8:39 pm Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries I have been very quiet while all of this discussion has been going on over bloodlines verses homosexual relationships. One of our moderators has stated that the people who con

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Darlene & > Don Hicks > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:16 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - > was Re:

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Wayne, What prevents a Legacy user from utilizing Legacy's current features to construct a family history including Homosexual relatives? Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Legacy can handle these relationships. It is quite flexible. For example: On the family, pedigree, descendant, or index tab: right click to add a spouse (even

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Joe: By developing a program for genealogists only, as was recommended/advocated by Bill Anderson, Millenia would be catering to the people who have a very restricted

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:16 pm Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

I'd venture to guess that most current Legacy owners use only a fraction of the features available. Legacy owners are no more obligated to use every single feature now, then they will be in the future--regardless of the changes to the program. Dawn Darlene & Don Hicks wrote: s

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

ut of MY public institutions and my genealogy programs. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Darlene & Don Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:16 pm > Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? -

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:16 pm Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line back as far as I can. I could care less about family history o

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

What kind of record do you think you could find, going back to 1800, indicating the sexual preferences of your ancestors? If you are going to exclude homosexual couples because they don't have children, you need to exclude childless couples. I presume this list is moderated? It is inexcusable f

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

hange. ___ Wayne Martell Victoria, BC, Canada - Original Message - From: joe Martin To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Wayne, Your example of a Genealogy Pr

Re: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

cy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] > Homosexual > Entries > > > > I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line > > back as far as I can. I could care less about family > > history or some odd relationship between two people of > &g

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line back as far as I can. I could care less about family history or some odd relationship between two people of the same sex. So far, I have not found one homosexual relationship in my family going back to 1800. Maybe this is because my family

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Darlene, You are too narrow minded. I may not believe in that type of relationship, but I am also educated enough to know that those relationships are as old as marriage itself. Just because we don't come across written "confessions" doesn't mean they didn't exist in our genealogies. I think

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line back as far as I can. I could care less about family history or some odd relationship between two people of the same sex. So far, I have not found one homosexual relationship in my family going back to 1800. Maybe this is because my family is

RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries If Millenia wants to survive as a company, it must go the Family History route. A Family History program can be used by everybody, including the purists; a Genealogy program can only be used by the purists. They would be foolish to limit

Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

. ___ Wayne Martell Victoria, BC, Canada - Original Message - From: Bill Anderson To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 1:25 PM Subject: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Leaving aside the discussions on the

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:10:40 EDT Divorces,Wars,Children born out of wedlock and Homosexuality are in the Bible but Homosexuality is the only one that is said to be an abomination to God. This list is pushing too much for Homosexuality to

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Let's end this thread right now because a few people seem to be upset by it. Everyone, please review our Legacy User Group guidelines at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp. In addition, this topic has been thoroughly discussed before. You can check the Archived messages at: http://w

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries In a message dated 9/6/2007 7:58:27 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personal feelings about the morality or Homosexuality or other topics should not impact the feature set of genealogy

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries ATTN: LLOYD

Lloyf wasn't starting a thread, he was merely continuing a discussion of a programmatic change that Legacy ought to make and , in doing so, merely pointing out that some other items objectionable to others (perhaps including you) are recognized in the the Legacy program. TH [EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries ATTN: LLOYD

This is NOT the forum or place to start a conversation thread such as you are trying to start, Lloyd... Pami Main Lines: TAYLOR, RICHARDS (Welsh), LIPPINCOTT, KIRKBRIDE and all related & inter-related lines (too many to mention). ** Get a sneak peek o

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

I'm not bothered either way as I'm agnostic and it doesn't bother me but I'd rather live next door to a homosexual couple who are honest and friendly than a heterosexual couple who are trouble makers any day. So goodbye Lloyd and good riddance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/6

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

In a message dated 9/6/2007 7:58:27 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personal feelings about the morality or Homosexuality or other topics should not impact the feature set of genealogy software. Legacy has a place to record divorce although some people feel is it

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

yUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries In a message dated 9/5/2007 10:18:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Legacy ought to get with it, as should other genealogy programs, if we have to trick the system to record the ways

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

om Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Hi Jay, Currently there isn't a way to enter a homosexual relationship properly as the structure of the database assumes that all unions are male/female. You can include the partner with the wrong gender and adjust the wording in the "mar

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/5/2007 10:18:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Legacy ought to get with it, as should other genealogy programs, if we have to trick the system to record the ways things are. TH [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

In a message dated 9/5/2007 10:18:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Legacy ought to get with it, as should other genealogy programs, if we have to trick the system to record the ways things are. TH [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Legacy does not nee

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Exactly- as in one state they ARE legally recognized spouses -Original Message- From: TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 9:13 pm Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries Legacy ought to get with it, as should other gen

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

verly Walker Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:30 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries I am also interested in having a way to enter a homosexual partnership. I want to enter it in a way that demonstrates the partnership. I would appreciate L

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

I am also interested in having a way to enter a homosexual partnership. I want to enter it in a way that demonstrates the partnership. I would appreciate Legacy looking into this. It now a part of many families. Beverly Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Legacy ought to get with it, as should other genealogy programs, if we have to trick the system to record the ways things are. TH [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 9/5/07, Jay S Van Zeeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you all for the suggestions, I got it to work to my cousin's > satisfaction. > > Th

RE: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Thank you all for the suggestions, I got it to work to my cousin's satisfaction. Thanks for the help! Jay No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.5/990 - Release Date: 9/4/2007 10:36 PM Legacy User Group guidelines:

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Hi to both I don't have an answer for you, but as the grandmother of a trensgendered child (11 years old) I'm impressed by your concern and sensitivity. Hopefully the Legacy programmers will see fit to provide for these situations. I have the same issue. My suggestion is to create a uniqu

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Jay, I have the same issue. My suggestion is to create a unique event where you give the date and explain the facts. I wouldn't use the marriage screen as the partner would then erroneously show as a legally-recognized spouse. It isn't a perfect solution, but if you explain the software l

Re: [LegacyUG] Homosexual Entries

Hi Jay, Currently there isn't a way to enter a homosexual relationship properly as the structure of the database assumes that all unions are male/female. You can include the partner with the wrong gender and adjust the wording in the "marriage" screen to fit. It will look OK in most reports