Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

- Original Message - From: Maureen Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 4:11 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources Elizabeth wrote: ...I'll now sit back and wait for the backlash

Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

Gary wrote: ..Forcing that researcher to spend time and money obtain their own copy of every document I have located over decades of searching does nothing to extend the lines. Gary I agree with all you have said. I should have mentioned that I was not into pure genealogy - just the

Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

From: Maureen Chambers Also I think we are truly selling our descendants rather short by underestimating their ability to pick up where we have left off. If we are managing, I'm sure they will be more than capable of doing so, especially with the advances in electronic technology. As a

RE: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

: Friday, 29 February 2008 7:09 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources I would simplify the search into three categories: (1) search for deaths after 1857. If you get a list drawn up, then search criteria (2) and if successful, then add

Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

Elizabeth wrote: ...I'll now sit back and wait for the backlash . . . . ! No argument from me Elizabeth - I agree with you. While each of us may have different ideas on how and what and how much etc to record in the source fields, I feel that it is just as important for future individuals to