Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-23 Thread Michele Lewis
Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name. The correct way to enter females is my maiden name. All married names should be in the AKA field. michele - Original Message - From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Legacy User Group" Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-23 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
--- From: "Michele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:40 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name. The correct way to enter females is my maiden name. All marrie

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-23 Thread GeoSci
Discovered my problem after my post - SORRY! I do always enter females by their birth (maiden) name. One of my AKAs was sneaking into the picture and caught my eye - a close read showed that is was marked correctly. I would guess that I would have to use the AKA field for a legally changed name

RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-23 Thread ronald ferguson
AIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports > Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:52:10 -0900 > > I agree that reports should be showing the birth name. However, I don't know > that you "should" put marrie

RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-23 Thread ronald ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:55:12 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfami

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-23 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
(Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:58 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports Elizabeth I concur, and I happen to be one of those who do so wish to put m

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
Elizabeth Richardson wrote I agree that reports should be showing the birth name. However, I don't know that you "should" put married names in the AKA field. You "could" do so if you wish. I agree. Personally, I don't. Whenever I am entering information from a document or other source, I ent

RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

2008-11-24 Thread ronald ferguson
haw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports