Re: [LegacyUG] Set relationships problem

Hi Mary, Did you reset the relationships after you entered the new people? It doesn't happen automatically in v7. Hope this helps. :-) Kind Regards, Wendy Howard -- Kaiwaka, Northland, New Zealand http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~wendyh65/

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

ide Kingston, NY - Original Message - From: "Thomas Herson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships Elsie, Where do you find the "relationship" field and how do you set it to show on the Fami

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

You can clear them the same way you set them. That would turn them off Tim - Original Message - From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:28 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships Perhaps the optimal solution wou

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

No problem, I'm an old woman! '-) Elsie - Original Message - From: "Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships OK, I understand. Thanks Elsie. I think I would rather have t

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

- From: "Thomas Herson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships Elsie, Where do you find the "relationship" field and how do you set it to show on the Family view? I've brought up a few of

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

OK, I understand. Thanks Elsie. I think I would rather have that notation even if I do have to reset relationship. Thank you so much for explaining this to an old man Joseph Elsie Saar wrote: A non-direct relationship is like "husband of the second cousin, six times removed." Per

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

ot;Elsie Saar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships When I enter a person, I have a field I call "relationship" that I complete when I enter a person. I set this field to show on the Family view.

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

option to use v6 or v7 as with the Source writer. Elsie - Original Message - From: "Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:13 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships OK, you could be right. What is/are the non-direct relationship

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Thanks, Tim. I was hoping you had a secret for me. ;-) Elsie - Original Message - From: "Tim Rosenlof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:40 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships After reading some of the replies on this subject

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

iginal Message - From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 7:04 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships Elsie, you make my point: "having to reset relationships or opening the relationship calculator every time I add a

RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships

ns of N.W. England See: > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ > _ > > > > >> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:29:30 -0500 >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships >> >> >> I wond

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

OK, you could be right. What is/are the non-direct relationships? I'm not sure what that is. I don't recall this. Maybe I shouldn't skim over the mail so much. Joseph ronald ferguson wrote: Joseph, So you would also like the non-direct line relationships tak

RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships

/fergys/ _ > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:29:30 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships > > > I wonder why they changed this. It'

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

I wonder why they changed this. It's been an annoyance to me; having to reset relationships each time. I wonder if this is a bug, they deliberately took it away, or someone's just trying to make things difficult for us? SUGGESTION TO THE PROGRAMMERS: Put the automatic Relationship setti

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

t: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:10 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships Elsie, In version 7 Basic and Deluxe I could not reproduce your problem. I cleared them and set them again with the it working fine. Try a maintance on your file. Tim - Original Message - From: &quo

RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:59:11 -0400 > > But, Ron, havin

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Thanks, Ron. Hmm ... I haven't upgraded to Legacy 7.0 yet ... but I would really, really like all those non-direct relationships ... maybe I need to update the PC first :-( Mary On 9/23/08, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, Mary, you haven't misunderstood the question. I too rem

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

method, like with Sources. Elsie - Original Message - From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:00 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships No, Mary, you haven't misunderstood the question. I too remember V6 sett

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Tim, are you saying that when adding a new related person, the relationship updates for you? What do I have to check to get it to do that for me? Elsie - Original Message - From: "Tim Rosenlof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:10 AM Subjec

RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships

No, Mary, you haven't misunderstood the question. I too remember V6 setting relationships for new persons, but if it can be done that way in V7 I haven't found it. One reason for this maybe the addition of all the non-direct relationships (which I seem to remember were requested by users), I c

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Elsie, In version 7 Basic and Deluxe I could not reproduce your problem. I cleared them and set them again with the it working fine. Try a maintance on your file. Tim - Original Message - From: "Elsie Saar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:28 PM Subject: F

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

22, 2008 7:57 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships Elsie, I was certain that I had seen an answer to this, however, it's a WYSIWYG, that is to say you do have reset after adding a new person (or at least I have to as w

RE: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Elsie, I was certain that I had seen an answer to this, however, it's a WYSIWYG, that is to say you do have reset after adding a new person (or at least I have to as well). Ron Ferguson _ *New* Insert Pictures Into your Web

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships Not Showing

here they have always appeared. > > Elizabeth > researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson > > - Original Message - From: Renee Zamora > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:19 PM > Subject: Re: [

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships Not Showing

erson) Thompson - Original Message - From: Renee Zamora To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:19 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships Not Showing I just did the check/repair and everything appears ok, no messages after wards. Still the relatio

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships Not Showing

I just did the check/repair and everything appears ok, no messages after wards. Still the relationship is not showing where the husband and wife titles appear. I finally had to change the 5th field to show the relationship but this is not acceptable to me. I like that field to show any 2nd spouse

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships Not Showing

You must have missed the discussion over the last few days, about the 'paid by Legacy' archive server having various problems in maintaining, separation from other clients (or something like that). It should be fixed by now, or 'soon'. I didn't need to understand the details. Rich in LA CA --- O

RE: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships Not Showing

Renee, Try a check/repair from the file menu, then try again. btw, how many people are in your database ? Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Renee Zamora Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:13 PM To: Legacy Mailing List Subject: [Lega

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

10:15 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships No problem here. Could you give some more steps so we can see where it goes wrong. Some questions: Did you set relationships for the correct individual? Which button did you click? Evert 2008/9/16 Elsie Saar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I tried go

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Yes, I see bisnis-bali as well. I still see some legacy related links, but there is definitely something wrong now. Evert 2008/9/16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The link at the bottom of the emails does work but the archive page has > "bisnis-bali" at its top left. Looks like the arch

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

Rich in LA CA --- On Tue, 9/16/08, Evert van Dijken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Evert van Dijken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 7:15 AM > No proble

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

The link at the bottom of the emails does work but the archive page has "bisnis-bali" at its top left. Looks like the archive service is one of the possibly dubious (free?) ones that might explain some of the strange threads in the archive and maybe why spam has gotten into the Legacy list. J

Re: [LegacyUG] set relationships

No problem here. Could you give some more steps so we can see where it goes wrong. Some questions: Did you set relationships for the correct individual? Which button did you click? Evert 2008/9/16 Elsie Saar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I tried going to the Archives to find this but found some gibberis

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships

Many thanks - all is clear now On 08/10/2007, Evert van Dijken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > from the help (relationships: asterisks) > > If the relationship show is a cousin type, it will show the kind of > cousin (first, second, etc.) and how many generations removed, in the > form of 1C2R (first

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships

from the help (relationships: asterisks) If the relationship show is a cousin type, it will show the kind of cousin (first, second, etc.) and how many generations removed, in the form of 1C2R (first cousin, twice removed). If the generations removed are in the descendant direction, meaning that t

RE: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

ips to the "family" rather than one individual. Failing that having a "macro" facility might reduce the typing/clicking. Jack -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mary Young Sent: 05 July 2007 09:22 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamil

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

So I suppose, it's just a coincidence that Jack gets email after Setting Relationships? I have no problem with re-setting Relationships, sometimes many times in one day. It is so useful for checking e.g. Scottish Births and Deaths which show informant's relationship to newborn or deceased party. R

RE: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Young Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2007 7:06:PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses Hi, Jack Why do you get an email if you set relationships to your wife? Can't get my head ro

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

Hi, Jack Why do you get an email if you set relationships to your wife? Can't get my head round this at all Regards, Mary Young On 6/20/07, Jack Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I used to have one database for my own family and a second one for my wife's family. When we discovered the THIRD

RE: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

Elizabeth Cunningham Sent: 20 June 2007 22:08 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses I made one of our kids the starting point. Then I get both families. Crude, but it works. Elizabeth C Jack Earnshaw wrote: >I used to have

RE: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

I use my son to set the relationships on. That way I get relationships for both my husbands and my lines. I can always subtract on level to know what the relationship is for me or my husband. La Nell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Ea

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

Hi Jack, If you have children, the logical thing is to set relationships to one of them. If not there may be another person who is related to both sides of the tree. I often set relationships to one of my great nephews as his ancestors are related to both my father's extended family and one of

Re: [LegacyUG] Set Relationships for both spouses

I made one of our kids the starting point. Then I get both families. Crude, but it works. Elizabeth C Jack Earnshaw wrote: I used to have one database for my own family and a second one for my wife's family. When we discovered the THIRD connection between our families I decided that t

RE: [LegacyUG] "Set Relationships" malfunctioning since latest updates

Yes. It has been reported before and (I think) is corrected in the next update. Ron Ferguson _ For Genealogy, Software and Social visit: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ *New Blogs: Transparency with The GIMP, Downloadable