Re: [LegacyUG] Getting rid of commas

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
Anne, I would be interested to learn what you consider to be the benefits of the 4 field convention. Frankly I cannot really see anything worthwhile for non-Americans. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: Anne Hollingshead Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 4:03 AM To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Location for Bristol England

2011-08-27 Thread atlantajm
And, of course, New Yorkers seem to treat the City as if it were some independent city-state. Many of the records that I have from my family's early years in America simply refers to neighborhoods and they do not even mention the state. One old letter to my grandmother is addressed to her, the

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:55:16 -0700 (PDT), Ron Taylor doit4...@yahoo.com wrote: In Legacy, a blank Child Relationship to Parent means Biological. I would like to get rid of the Biological and make them all blank. If you get a sec, what script might accomplish that or perhaps you might want to

RE: [LegacyUG] Location for Bristol England

2011-08-27 Thread Carl Cox
One old letter to my grandmother is addressed to her, the name of the hotel she lived at, and City. When mailing a letter that goes to someone else within the same city, city was often used rather than writing out the city and state names. But that cannot be used now because the sorting is often

Re: [LegacyUG] Getting rid of commas

2011-08-27 Thread Anne Hollingshead
Ron, The benefits I find are ease of use. If I have many entries for the same town/city ( I am not hung up on what a town is or how big it is I just use common usage) I put Liverpool, , Lancashire, England Liverpool-9 King St, , Lancashire, England Liverpool-St Peter's Church, , Lancashire,

Re: [LegacyUG] location Tamer

2011-08-27 Thread Joan
I'd be very happy to help with your 'location tamer' All good wishes Joan On 27 Aug 2011, at 00:57, Terry Foster tfost...@kc.rr.com wrote: I'm a developer by trade and am fairly adept at Microsoft Access. I love Legacy but I have found all genealogy software sorely lacking in the ability

Re: [LegacyUG] Getting rid of commas

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
Anne, With respect, I am a Lancastrian and my family is of Cumberland descent, and if it wasn’t for the fact that I have some experience of genealogy I would have some difficulty in recognising those locations. I too set the Location List to read from right to left, but I put the Street as a

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Taylor
That is exactly what I thought could be done but it doesn't work with that table. The message This record cannot be Combined. It is used by Legacy as a blank record. is displayed. Do you have any other ideas short of an Access update script? Thanks for your response. Ron Taylor --- On Sat,

Re: [LegacyUG] location Tamer

2011-08-27 Thread Nannette Fretwell
Hi Terry, Your Access work looks great to me, also. I too was wondering how to get this type of information out of Legacy - as is. It just isn't there. You certainly have a great idea here. I think you should approach Legacy for an Add-On. I myself am not experienced enough, I think, in Access to

Re: [LegacyUG] location Tamer

2011-08-27 Thread gcr...@juno.com
Be interesting to see what the official reaction is from the Legacy folks! gc -- Original Message -- From: Nannette Fretwell nannet...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] location Tamer Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:26:15 -0600 Hi Terry, Your Access

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:20:55 -0700 (PDT), Ron Taylor doit4...@yahoo.com wrote: That is exactly what I thought could be done but it doesn't work with that table. The message This record cannot be Combined. It is used by Legacy as a blank record. is displayed. That is odd. AFAIK that is the

[LegacyUG] Re: Adding Relationships to Ancestor Report; Changing Standard Wording for was born in

2011-08-27 Thread Lorraine
Hi, all, I have two quick questions that I have not been able to find the answer for in the FAQs, that I hope someone onlist may have already worked out. 1. Is it possible to add relationships to an Ancestor Report to be printed out? I am going to print a report for my mother, and would like to

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Brian/Support
The Master lists which can be considered categorical and which have default values like the parent child relationships, child status, source type, etc. do not allow you to combine a non-blank value with the blank entry at the top of the list. The tables which are built of user entered values like

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:52:14 -0400, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote: The Master lists which can be considered categorical and which have default values like the parent child relationships, child status, source type, etc. do not allow you to combine a non-blank value with the blank

Re: [LegacyUG] Temple Master List duplicates

2011-08-27 Thread Brian/Support
Ron, I just checked the temple list in my copy of Legacy and did not see your duplication. Perhaps your temple name duplicates came from a GEDCOM you imported. Do you use the LDS options? Have you imported temple ordinances from Family Search? How are temples named in the Family Search site? I

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:02:14 -0400, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:52:14 -0400, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote: The Master lists which can be considered categorical and which have default values like the parent child relationships, child

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Brian/Support
OK. I only checked the parent child and source type tables before generalizing. Obviously you will have to check each table to make a definitive list. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy!

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:52:14 -0400, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote: The Master lists which can be considered categorical and which have default values like the parent child relationships, child status, source type, etc. do not allow you to combine a non-blank value with the blank

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Adding Relationships to Ancestor Report; Changing Standard Wording for was born in

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
Lorraine, I don’t think there is an answer to your second question, but this is off the top of my head and I am afraid that I am really too busy to look in detail at the moment. To the first part: have you considered using the Publication Centre and adding a Relationship Report? Ron Ferguson

Re: [LegacyUG] Temple Master List duplicates

2011-08-27 Thread Tim Rosenlof
That is probably the case. I however imported a temple list for testing. I'm on the side of Brian. Brian, they are using the Logan Utah Temple Billings Montana Temple Tim On 8/27/2011 10:02 AM, Brian/Support wrote: Ron, I just checked the temple list in my copy of Legacy and did not

Re: [LegacyUG] Temple Master List duplicates

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Taylor
Thanks Brian, I will look at the Temple names being pulled from nFS. That may very well be the cause of the duplicates. Ron Taylor Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

Re: [LegacyUG] change Child Relationship = Biological to blank

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Taylor
Thanks for this verification. I was pretty sure this was the case with the status tables. Dennis provided a quick script that should accomplish the trick. Ron Taylor --- On Sat, 8/27/11, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote: From: Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com Subject:

RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Adding Relationships to Ancestor Report; Changing Standard Wording for was born in

2011-08-27 Thread CE Wood
As to question 2, I have the opposite problem! born about 1410 down Ampney, Gloucestershire No in at all, and the name of the town is Down Ampney. CE From: Lorraine [mailto:notenoughbi...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 8:46 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject:

[LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread CE Wood
Further to my comment below, I followed the Legacy Help instructions and removed down from the list of default Location Prepositions. Didn't help. Next step in Help said to check the box, Remove the common prep on the Sort page of Master Locations. Didn't help. I know I can put a

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:07:36 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: Further to my comment below, I followed the Legacy Help instructions and removed down from the list of default Location Prepositions. Didn't help. Did you shut down Legacy, edit the file, then reopen Legacy? -- Dennis Kowallek

[LegacyUG] Missing Master Source List after Restore

2011-08-27 Thread Clarice Brackett
I just installed Legacy 7 on a new computer and restored my family files from a backup file. Everything seems okay except my Master Source List is missing. Where did I go wrong? Clarice Brackett Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages

RE: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread CE Wood
Yes. Didn't help. CE -Original Message- From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com] Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 12:17 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:07:36 -0700, CE Wood

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:19:24 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: Yes. Didn't help. What was the name of the file you edited? -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools NOTE TO LUG USERS: Use plain text if you want me to read

Re: [LegacyUG] Missing Master Source List after Restore

2011-08-27 Thread Randy Clark
Are all the show Only boxes unchecked? On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Clarice Brackett reecy1...@hotmail.comwrote: I just installed Legacy 7 on a new computer and restored my family files from a backup file. Everything seems okay except my Master Source List is missing. Where did I go

RE: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread CE Wood
Preposition_English.lst CE -Original Message- From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com] Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 12:21 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:19:24 -0700, CE Wood

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:25:15 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: Preposition_English.lst That's funny. My V7.5 folder doesn't have a Preposition_English.lst, but my V6 folder does. Did you install V7 on top of an older V6 install? I wonder if V7 no longer uses Preposition_English.lst. --

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Joan
Down Ampney gave it's name to Ralph Vaughn Williams lovely music for the hymn 'Love Divine All Loves Excelling' sung at many a wedding Joan On 27 Aug 2011, at 20:36, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:25:15 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Laird
Dennis, My V7.5 has the file Preposition_English.lst with a created date of 10/11/2010. I first installed my Legacy in December of 2009. Perhaps that created date might be close to one of the Legacy updates. It is the only file with that creation date. Laird On 8/27/2011 2:36 PM, Dennis M.

RE: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread CE Wood
Thank you so much, Dennis! That works perfectly. As for your earlier observation about Preposition_English.lst and Legacy versions, I have only one Legacy folder. When I update, I just let the Legacy download do its thing. Whether or not it installed 7.5 over 6, I have no idea. CE

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
Re: Preposition_English.lst I have just done a Windows Explorer search of my PC and found the file in the Legacy folder. The point is that Legacy V7.5 was first installed on this machine just under 12 mths. ago when it was a new clean disk, in fact it was the first program I installed, so it is

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Wm Voss
I did the same -- file not found, so some of us got it and some of us didn't. Thinking it might be a create on first use, I made some changes to various locations, replacing the default preposition with gibberish, which work fine, but no lst file was created. Wm Voss On 27-Aug-11 3:16 PM, Ron

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
Now that does seem strange, or could it be that it is only included with the installation of certain language versions, mine being English-English - as might be expected. Ron Ferguson http:://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Wm Voss Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 11:34 PM To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Down Ampney not recognized as a location

2011-08-27 Thread Wm Voss
I don't see why it would be excluded for English/US (we've been known to use them, too -- sometimes correctly) and included with other languages, but I've pretty much given up looking for logic in Legacy. Wm Voss On 27-Aug-11 4:08 PM, Ron Ferguson wrote: Now that does seem strange, or could it

Re[2]: [LegacyUG] Separating Family branches

2011-08-27 Thread RC Sentz
I am trying to figure out how to best separate the two sides of the family so that I can create Gedcoms to share with the two sides of the family. Cousins on my father's side and on my mother's side. It seems that it might be easier to do charts, etc. with them separated. Is there a way to

Re: Re[2]: [LegacyUG] Separating Family branches

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
Ah! Advanced Tagging – right click on the tag boxes in Family View will enable you to tag all your father’s ancestors, but siblings you will have to tag separately and all branches/twigs. Or you could go to the oldest gg-grandparents (all if them if required) and tag their descendants and any

Re: Re[2]: [LegacyUG] Separating Family branches

2011-08-27 Thread Ron Ferguson
I should have added that Legacy Charts only allow ancestors and descendants plus spouses, so you would not be able to include the parents of spouses to direct line descendants. I have an old FTM program which allows all individuals in the file to be included in a chart, and when I wish to do

Re: [LegacyUG] Separating family branches

2011-08-27 Thread Wendy Howard
Hi Cathy, I want to separate out some of my family branches. Right now my name is the beginning of my genealogy file. I want to have my Father's side separate from my Mother's side. What is the best way to do this? Should I create a Gedcom file, rename the file and delete the family