When I installed Legacy 8 I kept Legacy 7.5 and both versions accessed the
same media folder trees (C:\Legacy\Docs\, C:\Legacy\Pictures, etc.). A week
or so ago I copied Media to C:\Users\Richard\Documents|Legacy Family
Tree\Media\vanwasshnova\Docs\{big Tree}, etc. with 359 folders.
The Media Relin
On 1/28/2014 6:45 PM, Paul Gray wrote:
> Try unchecking Option 8.11
I sure appreciate this, Paul. Thanks.
Lloyd
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived
Try unchecking Option 8.11
Hello LUGers,
How do I stop the PP red balls from showing by names in the Family View?
I have went to Options>Customize>Data Format and scrolled down to 3.12 and
unchecked it, but the red balls are still active in Family View.
Lloyd
Legacy User Group guidelin
Hello LUGers,
How do I stop the PP red balls from showing by names in the Family View?
I have went to Options>Customize>Data Format and scrolled down to 3.12
and unchecked it, but the red balls are still active in Family View.
Lloyd
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/
I agree with your suggestion about the use of the Notes fields and I tend to
use them quite a bit. However, there is an obscure bug in their use that could
present a minefield of disaster unless the user knows about this. This obscure
bug involves the use of “Alt.” events such as “Alt.Birth” or
I suspect that it has to do with the file type chosen when the file was
originally linked. In 7.5, there were buttons for Picture, Video, Sound, and
Document. In 8.0, the same process is there, it’s just a drop down menu.
Unfortunately, once chosen I see no way of re-displaying what you selected
Perhaps there has been a change since the initial release of version 8. When I
first ported my v7 data to v8 the first thing I noticed was that my twin sister
and I were both sporting the big red ball. The details on both said too long
after our older sister. Did it change since the initial r
I also just noticed the newspaper title is not italicized in the SourceWriter:
Newspapers > Online Archives (issued by the publisher) template, but it is
italicized in both the microfilm and unrelated content provider template.
True, this can be fixed by italicizing the title as you input it, bu
I may have just noticed a glitch in a couple SourceWriter templates.
SourceWriter: Newspapers > Print editions (microfilm or original)
Location State: Manitoba
Location City: Winnipeg (included because the town name is not included in the
title)
Title: The Morning Telegram
The outcome is: (Winni
I don't doubt this is what is happening, I'm just challenging the logic of it.
I don't know the birth times of any of the twins in my family so they appear in
the list alphabetically. In my view both twins should have the same PP flag
although I appreciate this is an isolated and possibly comple
Now I'm more confused than when I started :) - perhaps I didn't explain it well
enough. The first twin in the list has a correct PP ( birth too long after prev
child) being born some while after the previous child. The second twin born the
same day does not - I don't expect a PP for birth too so
On 1/28/2014 11:26 AM, Graham Love wrote:
> Now I'm more confused than when I started :) - perhaps I didn't explain it
> well enough. The first twin in the list has a correct PP ( birth too long
> after prev child) being born some while after the previous child. The second
> twin born the same d
I've isolated 517 WORD files in my media location that are attached to
individuals. Almost all are of information obtained from public records
(obits, wedding notices, anniversaries, birthdays, etc) found on the
Internet in old newspapers or the like, copied and pasted (along with the
source) and s
Kurt,
I think you need to tell Windows what program to use by default. In Windows
Explorer Right click on the file, then open with > choose default program.
--
Richard Van Wasshnova
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Kurt Kneeland
wrote:
> Well, I found the executable for Microsoft Office Word an
On 1/28/2014 8:08 AM, Brian/Support wrote:
> Yes, It does not apply to the second twin because the child dates are
> checked against the previous child in the list. That previous child (the
> first twin) has the same birthday so it is not too long after previous
> child. There is no check for birth
Yes, It does not apply to the second twin because the child dates are
checked against the previous child in the list. That previous child (the
first twin) has the same birthday so it is not too long after previous
child. There is no check for birth too soon after previous child but if
there was the
Thanks. Any thoughts about my PS relating to potential problems for twins?
Graham
Sent from my iPad
> On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:50, Brian/Support wrote:
>
> OK, I have confirmed this is a problem. The correct half relationships
> are for males the incorrect relationships missing the half were all fo
17 matches
Mail list logo
