No, not speaking of behavior, I have a family that has seven children,
born between 1765 & 1784, all well researched.
Another researcher has an eighth child that he shows born abt 1790. I
have some serious reservations since Mom would have been 50 by then, Dad
had three brothers (that I know of)
I probably don't use my tags enough, thanks for the idea.
Sally
On 2/22/2010 3:22 PM, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
> Hi Heeren,
>
> You could tag them with a tag you use for people that need more
> research. Or you could just create a person and link them to no one,
> then you could
On 2/22/2010 3:32 PM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
>
> *Caution* Another Researcher. This is, of course, a secondary source and by
> itself very unreliable. If this researcher quotes sources it is essential
> they are followed up, if not, then extreme caution is advised.
>
Always... but sometimes these l
That's a good idea, too.
Challenged isn't one of the status options but, as you said, it can be
added. Now, if we could assign a color to these children at the same
time
Thank you for sharing your solution.
Sally
On 2/22/2010 3:59 PM, Terri Brown wrote:
> When I have a situation like this
Found it, thanks.
Since asking the question the other researcher got back to me & admitted
that he had no idea why he put that child there or where he got the name
from.
But, I've learned a lot in the asking.
Thanks again,
Sally
On 2/22/2010 11:21 PM, Terri Brown wrote:
> Correction - The Chal
That's a good idea to do in addition to using "challenged". I love back
up plans.
Sally
On 2/23/2010 3:22 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
> Terri,
>
> Without disagreeing with your use of "Challenged" and "Disproved" the
> problem with their use is that they are are not visible other than in
> reports (i
Thanks for another good idea!
Sally
On 2/23/2010 9:31 AM, leo macdonald wrote:
> I have a suggestion, attach the questionable children to the family that they
> grew up living with, using the family surname if that is what they used. They
> may have been adopted, a grandchild raised as their own
This is great! What an innovative use of that option. I like it, thanks.
Sally
On 2/24/2010 10:19 AM, Rick Bowden wrote:
> Sally,
> If you want a visual cue in your database in the form of colour you
> might consider using the uncertain gender option. In the Individual
> information wind
Got to agree...this is a great program & I've had few problems over the
years...and those were quickly resolved.
I think they are doing a great job.
Sally
On 9/6/2015 7:25 PM, David Abernathy wrote:
>
> I have been running Lrgacy for msny years and as of yet to have any of
> these issues tha hav
I'm sure my work is not as important as yours...but, I've been doing
this for going on 4 decades...from typewritten reports through many
different genealogy software programs, including the Master Genealogist
from its earliest days...and find Legacy the best for me.
If you have not been able to do
Nan, have you checked out the Webinars that Legacy offers for free?
They are wonderful & if you miss the live version you can still catch it
free for a while afterwards.
I especially like the ones that show how to use the Legacy software...it
can do so much.
Another plus is that if you do need he
I have an original document from 1913, given by the USA Department of
State, that is 11.5" X 17".
It says:
United State of America Department of State
To all to whom these presents shall come, Greeting:
I, the undersigned, Secretary of State of the United States of America
do hereby request all
Thank you, I believe you are right. With that in mind I dug deeper
online & finally found a description of an early passport.
Wonder why the work "Passport" wasn't used on the document?
Thanks again,
Sally
On 9/24/2015 5:19 PM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
> Sounds like a Passport to me.
>
>
Legac
> class it as a Passport though.
>
> cheers Stan
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jenny M Benson"
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Sent: 25/09/2015 10:19:03 a.m.
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is this source?
>
>> On 24/09/2015 21:02
Frustration with any software can make people cranky...but, as so many
of us have learned, when one is having a problem that others do not
have, the problem is usually on the individual's end.
You have not said what platform you are using or from which of the many
genealogy software products you u
Hi,
Is there a way to print a family group report from the female point of view?
For instance...
I have women in my file who are peripheral relatives & their husbands
are not of prime interest to me at this time. I would like the group
report to be about her, her other marriages & all her child
es
>
> Preview or print the group sheets that involve that female.
> Ron Taylor
> On Saturday, April 5, 2014 9:39 AM, Heeren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to print a family group report from the female point of
> view?
>
> For instance...
>
> I have women in my
Thank you. That does give a quick look at all the vitals, doesn't it?
Sally
On 4/5/2014 11:50 AM, Mary Young wrote:
> The Individual Chart will start with a woman and show all her husbands
> and children.
>
>
>
> On 5 April 2014 16:19, Heeren <mailto:hee...@us
I use this a bit differently. I open the Sources from the person's
Family page by clicking on the little books icon. Then I scroll down
the events list to Father Rel.: & Mother Rel.: I add the source I used
to prove the child/parent relationship.
It's for my own use, I found out years ago I wou
I have spent most of the day working on a problem in Legacy 8.0.0.427.
It started with the discussion here about unlinking disproved
people/lines. Which made me think that I would really like to have the
program put some kind of color/letter/designation of some kind next to
people that you unlink
Support
>
> mich...@legacyfamilytree.com <mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com>
>
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com <http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com>
>
> *From:* Heeren [mailto:hee...@usit.net]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:49 PM
> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.co
Thanks, found the event...such as it was...Source was Newspaper with no
details and in the event itself no information at all. But, at least
it's gone now.
Thanks for the tagging info, too.
Sally
On 5/20/2014 4:16 PM, R G Strong-genes wrote:
> Heeren,
> The easiest way to fix it is t
There are so many options with this program I love it.
Thanks for your input,
Sally
On 5/20/2014 4:18 PM, ChasH wrote:
> I'm not sure but I think running Tools / Potential Problems report may
> show the people with the bad event name.
> On 5/20/2014 3:48 PM, Heeren wrote:
>&g
they
> have more spouses than they actually do? Look at their spouse list if you
> don't know how to read this information from the icons on Family View.
>
> Cathy
>
> Heeren wrote:
>
>> There are so many options with this program I love it.
>> Thanks for
That's a good idea, thanks.
I just thought if would be really obvious if the unlinked showed up
green or purple in the list or something...
I may just try your idea...of course, I'll have to remember to do it. LOL
Sally
On 5/20/2014 8:18 PM, Mary Young wrote:
> Just a thought - if it's only a
I'm really not understanding why so many people are trashing this button
when the description of what it does is very clear. When you hover over
it, it says "Add Clipboard Source to All Used Fields". That's pretty
specific.
You're blasting the software for user error and I don't think there is a
"sort of implies"??? LOL
If they wanted the button to apply just to the upper tier they would
have said so... they said, "All Used Fields". They said what they meant
and it does what they meant.
All the clipboard buttons are grouped together so that you can find
them easily, they were not "i
Something I've just started using (since getting WIN7) is OneNote by
Microsoft. It was loaded on the computer & is just great.
I've named one of the notebooks "Genealogy" and have folders for the
main names, then pages for individuals.
You can write stories, add pictures or scans. And side not
28 matches
Mail list logo
