Brian,
Well, I was nearly right LOL. Still not fazed though!
Ron Ferguson,
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Brian L. Lightfoot
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 4:12 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
According to Ron, I am
On 25 Aug 2015 5:12 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> According to Ron, I am " amased" at the British spelling. I must have "dosed"
> off so now I am simply "dased" at the variations. Methinks the keyboards in
> the British Isles must lack the letter Z because some thief in the night
> "seised" them
t: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
That is why the English version of Legacy has four dialects you can choose:
English - Australia
English - Canada
English - United Kingdom and
English - United States
We all have our own idiosyncrasies for spelling.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporati
s.co.uk/
>
>
>
> From: Brian L. Lightfoot
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 4:06 PM
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
>
> But then I’d want an option to avoid the British spelling of
> “legalised†to the pr
Brian,
With respect. the English version is the preferred, as with all words ending in
“sed”. LOL
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Brian L. Lightfoot
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 4:06 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d
Yes, and a person can have many relationships and no children.
When I originally questioned the use of "Never married and had no children"
I was told that, in this context, a marriage was any relationship which
resulted in children.
They (I forget who on Legacy staff) could not see or would not adm
al Message-
From: Pam White
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
I too am not happy with this change. I will now have to go through my
database and remove all the previously "never married and no children"
Brian wrote
>
> You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used
> "never married" so we changed it to a more general term relationship and
> now others are complaining about that.
>
Years ago, some users (myself included) "complained" about "Never Married
and Had No Children".
bject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used
"never married" so we changed it to a more general term relationship and
now others are complaining about that.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
b
t; Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 4:06 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
>
> But then I’d want an option to avoid the British spelling of “legalised”
> to the preferred American spelling as “legalized”. Maybe Brian in Support
> was correct: You cannot please everyone !
>
&g
t wants to continue that.
>
>
> CE
>
>
> --
> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:22:21 +0100
> From: a...@wavp.co.uk
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
>
> In which case it should be offered as an op
No comment. Tee hee!
Adrian
Bournemouth England
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: "Brian L. Lightfoot"
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d want an option to avoid t
Please submit as a suggestion, or it won't get in the queue.
Options are what sets Legacy apart. Let's hope it wants to continue that.
CE
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:22:21 +0100
From: a...@wavp.co.uk
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
In whi
: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
In which case it should be offered as an option as to wording.
Adrian
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 2:37 PM
In which case it should be offered as an option as to wording.
Adrian
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot please everyone. Users
[mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: 21 August 2015 14:38
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used "never
married" so we changed it to a more general term relationship and now others
a
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used
"never married" so we changed it to a more general term relationship and
now others are complaining about that.
Brian
Customer Su
device.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Wheeler
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Sent: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:35 PM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
>
> Before v. 10, I believe, if a person never married, the individual's view
> could be set to state
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
Before v. 10, I believe, if a person never married, the individual's view could
be set to state "Never married". Now it says "No relationships". Is it
possible for me to somehow customize th
19 Aug 2015 10:35 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
Before v. 10, I believe, if a person never married, the individual's view
could be set to state "Never married". Now it says "No relationships". Is
it possible for me to somehow customize this wording, going back to t
as I am
hunting online.
Just my two penneth.
On 20 August 2015 at 10:39, CE WOOD wrote:
> I agree, but that is not the point.
>
> "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
>
> Forethought is important.
>
>
> CE
>
>
> -
I agree, but that is not the point.
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
Forethought is important.
CE
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:37:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
I think the intent was
Please submit your suggestion to support; it will not be logged from here.
CE
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:14:38 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
SUGGESTION:
Please consider making the wording for no relationships and
>
> Let's see, that means: no mistresses, no concubines, no extra-marital
> affairs, no one night flings, etc.
>
> But "no relationships"? Legacy needs to get out more.
>
>
> CE
>
>
> > From: br...@legacyfamilytree.com
> > To: legacyusergroup@
to get out more.
CE
> From: br...@legacyfamilytree.com
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:09:19 -0400
>
> The wording for no relationships and had no children is not adjustable
> by the user nor is
*SUGGESTION:*
Please consider making the wording for no relationships and had no children
adjustable by the user as well as selectable for each individual.
Thank you!
Gene Wheeler
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Brian/Support
wrote:
> The wording for no relationships and had no children is n
Before v. 10, I believe, if a person never married, the individual's view
could be set to state "Never married". Now it says "No relationships". Is
it possible for me to somehow customize this wording, going back to the
orginal version as the default, but using the new wording when appropirate?
27 matches
Mail list logo
