Brian,
Well, I was nearly right LOL. Still not fazed though!
Ron Ferguson,
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Brian L. Lightfoot
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 4:12 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
According to Ron, I am
On 25 Aug 2015 5:12 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
According to Ron, I am amased at the British spelling. I must have dosed
off so now I am simply dased at the variations. Methinks the keyboards in
the British Isles must lack the letter Z because some thief in the night
seised them all. Big
:06 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d want an option to avoid the British spelling of
“legalised†to the preferred American spelling as “legalizedâ€. Maybe
Brian in Support was correct: You cannot please everyone
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d want an option to avoid the British spelling of
“legalised†to the preferred American spelling as “legalizedâ€. Maybe
Brian in Support was correct: You cannot please everyone !
Brian in CA
now others
Brian,
With respect. the English version is the preferred, as with all words ending in
“sed”. LOL
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Brian L. Lightfoot
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 4:06 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d
White dpwh...@ihug.co.nz
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
I too am not happy with this change. I will now have to go through my
database and remove all the previously never married and no children as I
have no way
Yes, and a person can have many relationships and no children.
When I originally questioned the use of Never married and had no children
I was told that, in this context, a marriage was any relationship which
resulted in children.
They (I forget who on Legacy staff) could not see or would not
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used
never married so we changed it to a more general term relationship and
now others are complaining about that.
Brian
Customer
...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: 21 August 2015 14:38
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used never
married so we changed it to a more general term relationship and now others
are complaining about
In which case it should be offered as an option as to wording.
Adrian
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
You cannot
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used
never married so we changed it to a more general term relationship and
now others are complaining about that.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
On 20/08/2015
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
In which case it should be offered as an option as to wording.
Adrian
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent
Aug 2015 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d want an option to avoid the British spelling of “legalised”
to the preferred American spelling as “legalized”. Maybe Brian in Support
was correct: You cannot please everyone !
Brian in CA
*From:* a...@wavp.co.uk
Please submit as a suggestion, or it won't get in the queue.
Options are what sets Legacy apart. Let's hope it wants to continue that.
CE
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:22:21 +0100
From: a...@wavp.co.uk
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
In which case
to continue that.
CE
--
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:22:21 +0100
From: a...@wavp.co.uk
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
In which case it should be offered as an option as to wording.
Adrian
Sent from my android
No comment. Tee hee!
Adrian
Bournemouth England
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Brian L. Lightfoot br...@the-lightfoots.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
But then I’d want an option
for a
marriage or not, or a means of recording no children (for those not
married).
I will also be putting in a suggestion that we are given a choice.
Pam
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 1:37 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
Brian wrote
You cannot please everyone. Users complained frequently when we used
never married so we changed it to a more general term relationship and
now others are complaining about that.
Years ago, some users (myself included) complained about Never Married
and Had No Children. because
...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:09:19 -0400
The wording for no relationships and had no children is not adjustable
by the user nor is it selectable for each individual.
Brian
Customer Support
*SUGGESTION:*
Please consider making the wording for no relationships and had no children
adjustable by the user as well as selectable for each individual.
Thank you!
Gene Wheeler
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com
wrote:
The wording for no
, no concubines, no extra-marital
affairs, no one night flings, etc.
But no relationships? Legacy needs to get out more.
CE
From: br...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:09:19 -0400
I agree, but that is not the point.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Forethought is important.
CE
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:37:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
I think the intent was something
Please submit your suggestion to support; it will not be logged from here.
CE
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:14:38 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
SUGGESTION:
Please consider making the wording for no relationships
Version 10??? Wait a minute…did Millennia pull a Microsoft trick and jump from
version 8 to version 10? Was I sleeping and missed this? Will Donald Trump
really be the Republican nominee?
Brian in CA
From: Gene Wheeler [mailto:bridge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 2:35 PM
'Never married' is definitely not the same as 'no relationships' and I am at a
loss as to how anyone at Legacy can think it is. If it was changed for
political correctness which I suspect, surely 'no legalised relationship' would
be better but I suppose that might intimate other relationships
wood...@msn.com wrote:
I agree, but that is not the point.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Forethought is important.
CE
--
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:37:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
26 matches
Mail list logo
