Support for same sex marriages was introduced in Legacy 9.0. Legacy 8.0
does not support them.
Brian Kelly
On 09-Oct.-19 6:22 a.m., JoPoi wrote:
Is it possible to have a same sex marriage using Legacy v8 DL.
--
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subs
HI,
When I do reports that contains same sex marriages it will print the spouse in
one family report but when I try to do the spouse of the other family it will
not be included. Any ideas.
Ken
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
A few simple requests from a lurker and sometimes poster, please:
(1) that we all remember to SNIP, as sometimes these posts and their
previous postings get rather long. It might also save us from having
to see/reread certain posts.
(2) kindness, helpfulness and answering a question are what we ar
re is absolutely no reason to comment on
this warning. To do may also result in removal from the LUG.
Thank you,
Jim Terry
LUG Administrator
LegacyFamilyTree.com
Original Message
> From: "Ian GARDENER"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 5:31 AM
> To: LegacyU
Darlene & Don Hicks wrote:
> My genealogy is about blood lines. I haven't found any gays in my
> family, but if I did, I would not list them as partners.
I've only come across one that I know of and since she married one of
my favourite cousins, then dumped him for another woman (I found out
cour
away from Legacy & LDS resources.
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:j...@jgen.ws]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 2:57 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
I was just thinking along the same lines. How do you record the
c
On 2012/07/10 11:30, Lloyd Hite wrote:
> On 7/9/2012 10:49 PM, Darlene & Don Hicks wrote:
>> >Gays are a very small percentage of this country, and no matter how loud
>> >they scream for this option, it would not be accepted by the other 93%
>> >of us Christians. If this ever happens, I will be o
01:42:02
> /*To:*/ LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
> /*Subject:*/ Re: Family history or genealogy (was Re: [LegacyUG] Same
> sex "marriage".
> snip.
> Genealogy or family history. I hadn't thought about it that way be
: 07/10/12 01:42:02
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Family history or genealogy (was Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex
marriage".
snip.
Genealogy or family history. I hadn't thought about it that way before.
So I guess 'genealogy' means I should get busy recording the
ittle bit at a time
---Original Message---
From: JLB
Date: 07/10/12 01:42:02
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Family history or genealogy (was Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex
marriage".
I disagree that it's your purview to decide when a thread should end. I
don&
mptation to find out more...It is family history AND genealogy in my
> case...and I rather enjoy the sounds of the skeletons hanging in the closet
> /---Original Message---/
> /*From:*/ JLB <mailto:j...@jgen.ws>
> /*Date:*/ 07/10/12 00:58:25
> /*To:*/ LegacyUserGroup@Le
enjoy the
sounds of the skeletons hanging in the closet
---Original Message---
From: JLB
Date: 07/10/12 00:58:25
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
I was just thinking along the same lines. How do you record the
child(ren) of a het
.com>
> /*Date:*/ 07/10/12 00:26:16
> /*To:*/ LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
> /*Subject:*/ Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
> It is about blood lines as when two people marry the child of this
> marriage has the bl
that
this discussion has run its course and is rapidly descending to a personal
bias levelLet's move on
---Original Message---
From: Darlene & Don Hicks
Date: 07/10/12 00:26:16
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
___
From: JLB
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
Marriage is not about blood lines. Unless you marry a cousin.
JL Beeken
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www
always relabel it to "unacceptable fact" (tongue in
ckeek)..:
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:j...@jgen.ws]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 1:28 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
Marriage is not about blood lin
This discussion just proves that you can't trust anyone elses database.
You must find and verify the facts yourself.
If my grandpa were hanged as a horse thief should I omit that fact because
I don't like it?
Sally
In a message dated 7/9/2012 11:41:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
familyt...@wigh
ginal Message---
From: Darlene & Don Hicks
Date: 07/09/12 23:17:10
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
My genealogy is about blood lines. I haven't found any gays in my family,
but if I did, I would not list them as partners.
eason and the
> great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the
> right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power
> of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave."
>
>
> - John Adams, On the Rights of the Colonists, 177
.
>
>
> Ah for the good old days.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Michele Lewis [mailto:ancestor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 7:51 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
>
> I k
gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift,
and voluntarily become a slave."
- John Adams, On the Rights of the Colonists, 1772
From: Lloyd Hite
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 7:25 PM
Subject: R
If someone wants to record these things, they can work it out on their own. As
for me and my house, we won't be recording this either. I don't use the LDS
options that are provided but I don't complain that they are there either.
This doesn't seem like something that needs to be discussed her
sage-
From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2012 12:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
During one of the discussions on this topic several years ago the programmers
said that they just never co
I have to agree. Facts are facts and opinions are opinions and most
religious views are opinions. They don't belong in determining the
construct of a database of facts.
JL Beeken
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/
On 7/9/2012 7:23 PM, salude...@aol.com wro
During one of the discussions on this topic several years ago the
programmers said that they just never considered same sex relationships.
Their LDS beliefs had no bearing at the time. As they wrote Legacy many
decisions on optimizing searches and other features in the code are
based on heterosexua
I'm sorry but I don't understand your way of thinking. Are you telling us
that if you don't like a FACT, then you are going to ignore it and not
include it in your database? Your personal beliefs have nothing to do with
recording genealogy FACTS!
Sally
In a message dated 7/9/2012 7:54:31 PM
It is Legacy's prerogative and I respect that. I will point out that in
some areas of the county - and I live in one - it is now a legal
standard. Here its not even a civil union. It is recognized by the state
as a marriage. As someone doing the family history, I believe I must
remain true to the
roup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
I know my point of view will not be popular but I don't record any gay
relationships in my Legacy file. I would be one of those religious freaks :)
My husband does have a cousin that is openly gay. In my file he is
I know my point of view will not be popular but I don't record any gay
relationships in my Legacy file. I would be one of those religious freaks :)
My husband does have a cousin that is openly gay. In my file he is listed as
"never married." I think Legacy doesn't allow same sex marriages be
regard.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ArdenholmeGenealogy [mailto:geneal...@ardenholme.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012 6:15 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
>
> Hi Rich
>
> I too would be interested
]
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012 8:07 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage" and other non standard
relationships.
ArdenholmeGenealogy wrote:
> Ian, I wholeheartedly support you in that Legacy needs to be forward
> thinking in including todayâ
riginal Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy [mailto:geneal...@ardenholme.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012 6:15 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
Hi Rich
I too would be interested to know how you have done it, just tried it myself
a
Based on the workaround web page it looks like running maint will just reverse
it.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012 7:34 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
Group@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage" and other non standard
relationships.
Here is what I do for same sex relationships.It's not perfect but it
helps.
I enter the same sex partner as the spouse, which of course makes that partner
the wrong sex, and th
I'll check that out, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Rita Lynn McKale [mailto:cagr...@comporium.net]
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012 11:17 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage" and other non standard
relationships.
Here is what I
2012 6:07 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage" and other non standard
relationships.
ArdenholmeGenealogy wrote:
> Ian, I wholeheartedly support you in that Legacy needs to be
> forward thinking in including today’s society and not
> yesterda
ArdenholmeGenealogy wrote:
> Ian, I wholeheartedly support you in that Legacy needs to be
> forward thinking in including today’s society and not
> yesterday’s. I have many friends who are gay and have been living
> with their partners for many years that we no longer bat an eyelid
> to these
.
I emphasise that I am uncertain about this, but it can do no harm to try!
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 9:14 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
Hi R
: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Same sex "marriage".
Hi,
Yes please. By all accounts it’s not possible but people find a way ☺
Cheers
Ian GARDENER
From: Richard Falzini [mailto:rfalz...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012 4:08 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@Legac
There is no way you can create a union between two people of the same sex in
Legacy. Someone did come up with a workaround some time ago, but I can’t
remember what it was – a quick search of the archives has just shown me that
the link to the workaround explanation is no longer available. (It w
Hello I also have some openly gay members in my family, and when I added my
sister in law and her partner I was able to list both as female, and I listed
them as married as they had a civil marriage.
then I listed that they had no children
It was pretty simple for me to add her and my other gay
41 matches
Mail list logo
