Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-10 Thread Paula Ryburn
@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Sun, September 9, 2012 12:00:25 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC On 09/09/2012 16:43, Michele Lewis wrote: > It is on the master list cleanup screen, not the file maintenance. > My mistake, When you do a master list cleanup and you hit proceed, a >

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-10 Thread Paula Ryburn
Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams From: Randy Clark To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Fri, September 7, 2012 4:37:12 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 09/09/2012 16:43, Michele Lewis wrote: > It is on the master list cleanup screen, not the file maintenance. > My mistake, When you do a master list cleanup and you hit proceed, a > popup box comes up that says "Would you like to resent all Event > Sentences to their default wording?" and you ha

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Ron Ferguson
-Original Message- From: Michele Lewis Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 4:43 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC Jenny, It is on the master list cleanup screen, not the file maintenance. My mistake, When you do a master list

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Michele Lewis
Jenny, It is on the master list cleanup screen, not the file maintenance. My mistake, When you do a master list cleanup and you hit proceed, a popup box comes up that says "Would you like to resent all Event Sentences to their default wording?" and you have to answer yes or no. One mistake he

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 09/09/2012 16:04, Michele Lewis wrote: > I read about how y'all do this (changing the way things are worded) > but I have never even tried it. It seems too advanced to me:) It really is quite simple. You could try it a few times on the Sample file or a copy of your Family file. I > woul

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Michele Lewis
roper format for Washington, DC On 09/09/2012 14:18, Michele Lewis wrote: > Event/Fact: Residence > Description: 123 Main Street > Date: 06 Apr 1922 > Place: Purvis, Lamar, Mississippi, United States > > The output will be: > > He resided at 123 Main Street on

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 09/09/2012 14:18, Michele Lewis wrote: > Event/Fact: Residence > Description: 123 Main Street > Date: 06 Apr 1922 > Place: Purvis, Lamar, Mississippi, United States > > The output will be: > > He resided at 123 Main Street on 06 Apr 1922 in Purvis, Lamar, Mississippi, > United States You

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Ron Ferguson
ilto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 9:09 AM >To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC > >Sorry, Michelle, but can you please explain what you mean? At the moment I >don't get it. >Ron Ferguson >h

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Michele Lewis
: Sunday, September 09, 2012 9:09 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC Sorry, Michelle, but can you please explain what you mean? At the moment I don't get it. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ GOONS #5307 "Michele Lewis&qu

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Ron Ferguson
> > >-Original Message- >From: Elizabeth Cunningham [mailto:drybo...@netreach.net] >Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 9:13 PM >To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC > >Not to mention street addresses. Almos

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-09 Thread Michele Lewis
y) > > and numerous independent cities in Virginia > > John S. Adams > Ventura, CA > > > ------ > -- > Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:12:59 -0400 > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC >

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Elizabeth Cunningham
ndependent cities in Virginia > > John S. Adams > Ventura, CA > > > -------- > Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:12:59 -0400 > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC > From: pph...@gmail.com > To: L

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Eliz Hanebury
I chicken out and just use London, there are too many options for me On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Pat Hickin wrote: > Great idea, Elizabeth, thank you!! > > JLB, > > How do you handle it when you've got something like London, which I think is > in more than one county? > I've got some London,

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread JLB
> Ron Ferguson > http://www.fergys.co.uk/ > > -Original Message- > From: JLB > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 7:42 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC > > No, not misunderstanding. That's what

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 08/09/2012 19:42, JLB wrote: > No, not misunderstanding. That's what I thought - that's where you put > everything. I just don't like it but I can see it would be easier than > trying to fit things into the 4 fields and then the Address fields to > take up the slack. > > The problem, as I see it

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
as I read about other ways of doing things, and then make my own mind up, I encourage others to do the same. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: JLB Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 7:42 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper forma

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread JLB
No, not misunderstanding. That's what I thought - that's where you put everything. I just don't like it but I can see it would be easier than trying to fit things into the 4 fields and then the Address fields to take up the slack. The problem, as I see it, is that it wouldn't fit nicely into Famil

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
There seems to be misunderstanding here, that is where Jenny and I put them! Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ GOONS #5307 "JLB" wrote: >That sounds like a plan. Lots of back-tracking though. I hate the way my >cousin puts everything including street name and number into the Master >Locatio

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread JLB
That sounds like a plan. Lots of back-tracking though. I hate the way my cousin puts everything including street name and number into the Master Locations and I changed them all. --- JL Beeken JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/ On 9/8/2012 2:21 AM, Jenny M

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC Me too! Seems the current discussion just goes to show that there are more exceptions than not, even in the US - for which the 4 field idea was 'invented'. Cheers Jan -Original Message- From:

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Jan Roberts
2 19:22 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC On 08/09/2012 01:48, JLB wrote: > I'm about to launch into England locations. Can hardly wait. My > theory, so far, is to fill in the 4 blanks as applicable and either > leave the rest or

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
Can we please be clear that at one time London was part of the county of Middlesex, and not the other way round. As there is no longer a Middlesex County Council technically it no longer exists. However, it is still used to describe an area and for post code (zip) purposes. Ron Ferguson http://w

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Jack Earnshaw
Stepney, London, England For a definition of the County of London see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_London Jack From: Pat Hickin [mailto:pph...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 September 2012 05:13 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 08/09/2012 05:12, Pat Hickin wrote: > How do you handle it when you've got something like London, which I > think is in more than one county? > I've got some London, Middlesex County locations. I think part of > Middlesex is outside of London. > Also, as in the US, I imagine some Middlesex Coun

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 08/09/2012 01:48, JLB wrote: > I'm about to launch into England locations. Can hardly wait. My theory, > so far, is to fill in the 4 blanks as applicable and either leave the > rest or put it under the Address. For instance, in English locations, > there's often a parish in a city. I put the par

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread Western Spirit Wood Creations
dent cities in Virginia John S. Adams Ventura, CA -- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:12:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC From: pph...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com G

RE: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-08 Thread John S. Adams
a, CA Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:12:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC From: pph...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Great idea, Elizabeth, thank you!! JLB, How do you handle it when you've got something like London, which I think is in more than one c

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread JLB
I know what you mean. London is a rather huge place. Part of Middlesex IS outside London or at least was 50 years ago. I only know that because I used to live there. Well, it gets laborious. First you have to look at the date and then figure out where the location was in which part of London and w

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread Pat Hickin
Sorry for failing to trim my last message -- thought about it too late. Pat Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - be

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread Pat Hickin
n wrote: > >> > >> That's what I do just to get Washington DC to sort the way I want (I'm > too > >> lazy to play with the sorting options). Just keep in mind there isn't a > >> county. > >> > >> Terri Brown > >> > >

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread Eliz Hanebury
t; >> Terri Brown >> >> From: JLB >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 10:32 PM >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC >> >> If Washington is a city and DC is treated as a state, wouldn&

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread JLB
y to play with the sorting options). Just keep in mind > there isn't a county. > Terri Brown > > *From:* JLB mailto:j...@jgen.ws>> > *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > *Sent:* Thursday, September 6, 2012 10:32 PM > *Subject:* Re: [LegacyU

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread Pat Hickin
on DC to sort the way I want (I'm too > lazy to play with the sorting options). Just keep in mind there isn't a > county. > > Terri Brown > >*From:* JLB > *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > *Sent:* Thursday, September 6, 2012 10:32 PM > *Subject:* Re: [

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread Terri Brown
, 2012 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC If Washington is a city and DC is treated as a state, wouldn't it be Washington, (blank), District of Columbia, United States? --- JL Beeken JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-07 Thread Randy Clark
I'm beginning to dislike the shape-shifting that needs to occur to force the location to conform to four fields or values. Use the four when it apllies. This is covered somewhat in EE 8.12. On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:32 PM, JLB wrote: > If Washington is a city and DC is treated as a state, wouldn

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-06 Thread JLB
If Washington is a city and DC is treated as a state, wouldn't it be Washington, (blank), District of Columbia, United States? --- JL Beeken JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/ On 9/6/2012 6:16 PM, Jackie King wrote: > Sorry - I didn't realize you were not i

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-06 Thread Jackie King
Sorry - I didn't realize you were not in the United States. The District of Columbia is a federal district that contains the city of Washington - but for all practical purposes the district for addressing is treated like you would a state. So you have two choices in my mind - the one you were giv

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-06 Thread JLB
Being not someone who lives in the U.S. I find this very confusing. As we watch it on television, it appears as though Washington DC is a city. So, is it Washington DC, , , United States? Or is Washington a county as you seem to be saying? And if so, what is DC? I'm reading you but I'm not getting

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-06 Thread Jackie King
All of my D.C. folks are very early on - so I get to use the county system. While it looks odd, what was suggested might work - or perhaps leave the city blank - put washington where you normally would put the county - and then the district and country. Jackie On 9/6/2012 8:01 PM, JLB wrote: > OK

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-06 Thread JLB
OK, I'll bite. What IS correct? Thanks for the other info. I never would have known. --- JL Beeken JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/ On 9/6/2012 5:29 PM, Jackie King wrote: > It may not be right but it depends on the time frame you are discussing. > Early

Re: [LegacyUG] proper format for Washington, DC

2012-09-06 Thread Jackie King
It may not be right but it depends on the time frame you are discussing. Early on, D.C. had two counties - Washington and Alexandria - and encompassed a portion of Virginia. In that case you probably would have treated it like any city and state with reference to the county. Later - about 1846 -