Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-17 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Anthony o...@inbox.org To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org; revi...@pacific-rim.net Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 12:49 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:40 AM, David

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread Frederik Ramm
Aleksandr, Aleksandr Dezhin wrote: I registered a separate account for the same email (using the scheme with me+someth...@gmail.com mailto:me%2bsometh...@gmail.com). Will my agreement with the new CT in new account work for my old account? To the API, that account does not have the same

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, David Groom wrote: However from a legal point of view the CT terms say is is an agreement between you and OSMF. Interesting, and probably true. But since making the second account forces you to use a different email address, how will we ever know with certainty that you and you are the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread David Groom
Original Message - From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:40 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT Hi, David Groom wrote: However from a legal point of view

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread Aleksandr Dezhin
2010/8/16 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Interesting, and probably true. But since making the second account forces you to use a different email address, how will we ever know with certainty that you and you are the same person? In this case, it is obvious that these multiple accounts

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread John Smith
On 16 August 2010 20:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: to legal, we've meanwhile almost reached the point where we send away 12-year-old mappers because they are not old enough to legally agree to the CT? (Why don't we, by the way?) (Oh no, sorry, delete that last question.)

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread Nakor
On 8/16/2010 6:24 AM, David Groom wrote: Therefore surely if I agree to the CT terms then legally it covers all the edits I make. If the intention is for it only to cover the edits I make when logged in o a specific user account, then I would have thought the CT terms need rewriting

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-16 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Nakor nakor@gmail.com To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT On 8/16/2010 6:24 AM, David Groom wrote: Therefore surely if I agree to the CT terms then legally

[OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT

2010-08-15 Thread Aleksandr Dezhin
For some reason I can not relicense my old edits (at least at this moment), but maybe I can make further edits in accordance with the new CT. I registered a separate account for the same email (using the scheme with me+someth...@gmail.com me%2bsometh...@gmail.com). Will my agreement with the new