On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 10:30:08 PM UTC-5, Thomas Passin wrote:
>
> I've just submitted a pull request for viewsarendered3 v3.0b14
>
I've merged the PR. pylint gives this complaint:
* Module leo.plugins.viewrendered3
leo\plugins\viewrendered3.py:1803:23: E0602: Undefined
As part of my "what's next for Leo" project, I decided to check in on
what's new with webassembly. Here is my google trail:
webAssembly: https://webassembly.org/
non-web Embeddings (because Leo doesn't run on the web):
https://webassembly.org/docs/non-web/
WebAssembly High-level goals: https:/
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 7:20:39 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 10:30:08 PM UTC-5, Thomas Passin wrote:
>>
>> I've just submitted a pull request for viewsarendered3 v3.0b14
>>
>
> I've merged the PR. pylint gives this complaint:
>
> **
I am so opposed to webassemblies that I don't want to work on them. Web
assemblies if widespread will encourage the trend towards breaking the web
by making URLs meaningless, and will promote more closed silos and data
hiding. I do see that they could be very good in non-web use, but that's
n
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Thomas Passin wrote:
>
> pylint gives this complaint:
>>
>> * Module leo.plugins.viewrendered3
>> leo\plugins\viewrendered3.py:1803:23: E0602: Undefined variable
>> 'AsciiDocError' (undefined-variable)
>>
>> Do you get the same complaint? If so, please a
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 7:41 AM Thomas Passin wrote:
> I am so opposed to webassemblies that I don't want to work on them. Web
> assemblies if widespread will encourage the trend towards breaking the web
> by making URLs meaningless, and will promote more closed silos and data
> hiding.
>
I have
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 10:59:41 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>> Actually, I knew about it. I'm not sure if it's real or something that
>> pylint doesn't understand (I think it's this).
>>
>
> If it's a pylint mistake, please disable the message.
>
I will once I'm sure. I pu
You're giving technology and standards too much credit. Corporations are
going to create closed systems and implement data hiding no matter the
tools they have at hand and they're going to continue to do it mercilessly
unless socially/culturally disincentivized to do so. Web assemblies will
not
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 11:00:48 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 7:41 AM Thomas Passin > wrote:
>
>> I am so opposed to webassemblies that I don't want to work on them. Web
>> assemblies if widespread will encourage the trend towards breaking the web
>>
Yes, that's so, and I understand that web assemblies are basically a Google
effort to do that.
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 11:20:12 AM UTC-4, lun...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> You're giving technology and standards too much credit. Corporations are
> going to create closed systems and implement
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:23 AM Thomas Passin wrote:
> I forgot to include the potential for malware. Some links:
https://www.virusbulletin.com/virusbulletin/2018/10/dark-side-webassembly/#h4-webassemblys-date-malware
https://medium.com/better-programming/webassembly-is-the-end-of-the-internet-
>
> I forgot to include the potential for malware. Some links:
>
According to the research mentioned in your third link that claims half of
the web sites using wasm use it maliciously, the malicious usage consist in
obfuscating and mining.
According to the first link, from the figure 4 it is
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-5, k-hen wrote:
Ok, got it, will need a bit of time, but will get back to you soon.
>
Something strange is going on. Here is what I think I know:
The unpacked original file is leo_error_test_01 - cleared - Copy.db. It is
about 28.1 MB in size.
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 11:00:38 AM UTC-5, vitalije wrote:
> By definition wasm code can't do anything that ordinary javascript in the
browser can't do...
> Concerning user tracking, all major social networks use it all the time,
regardless of wasm...
> Comparison with the Flash tech
The pylint message about an undefined variable was mistaken because that
variable can only be used after the condition has been met. Tested to
confirm.
I have created a PR for this updated version.
Unless someone reports anything seriously wrong or trivial to fix in the
next few days, I will
Hmm ... well at least it seems reproduceable. I did run across at
least one set of nodse after filing this that were behaving as clones
but not flagged as clones, and it's probably the same ones. Not sure if
it matters but the box icon was grey instead of black, I thought that
was unusual as well,
As a follow up:
I figured out the grey box, it's just the unsaved/dirty nodes, so it's not
that.
Regarding the file size for the DB, I assume this is because the version I
sent you doesn't have any content.
So I think this is a legitimate size for the doc, but it probably needs to
be vacuumed
17 matches
Mail list logo