ound, especially with Debian, that compiling yourself is a lot more
>>>> certain victory than Debian packages or pip.
>>>
>>>
>>> Although I'm having a workaround already, I'll spend the additional
>>> effort to install Leo 6.4-devel into Debian 10 us
;>> found, especially with Debian, that compiling yourself is a lot more
>>> certain victory than Debian packages or pip.
>>
>>
>> Although I'm having a workaround already, I'll spend the additional
>> effort to install Leo 6.4-devel into Debian 10 using Git (and ! P
I'll spend the additional effort
> to install Leo 6.4-devel into Debian 10 using Git (and ! Pip ! ).
>
> However after that, I'll just create an issue documenting the overall
> status of Leo on Debian.
>
> This is as much as I can / want to spend on this issue. - After all I
after that, I'll just create an issue documenting the overall
status of Leo on Debian.
This is as much as I can / want to spend on this issue. - After all I'd
like to start working on the other topic, which 'forces' me to move from a
Fedora VM to a Debian VM ;-)
With kind regards,
Viktor
--
You
- For some reason I now have to use
>a Debian VM - and - obviously would like to continue to use Leo as my
>outliner & notebook.
>
>Unfortunately I failed so far - and - am out of ideas now ...
>
>What did I do so far:
>
>* Failed initially to install Leo on Debia
I made a new Debian VM, and I did have to start with installing Leo 6.1 for
everything to work. I also had to repeat the installation because it quit
in the middle the first time, claiming that it was unable to open some
temporary directory. Then upgrading to 6.3 succeeded.
These
tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 12. März 2021 um 22:38:31 UTC+1:
> I tried downgrading Leo to 6.0, but it still failed with the same error.
> Then I downgraded PyQt5 to 5.15.1. I then downgraded PyQtWebEngine - but
> spelled all lowercase - also to 5.15.1 and then Leo 6.0 worked.
...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 12. März 2021 um 15:44:31 UTC+1:
>>>>
>>>>> I can't help directly with Debian, but Leo works fine on my VMs
>>>>> runn
u. I don't know what to do with it,
>> though.
>>
>> On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 12:29:34 PM UTC-5 viktor@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 12. März 2021 um 15:44:31 UTC+1:
>>>
>>>> I can't help direc
34 PM UTC-5 viktor@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 12. März 2021 um 15:44:31 UTC+1:
>>
>>> I can't help directly with Debian, but Leo works fine on my VMs running
>>> both Mint and Ubuntu, which are both Debian-based. I would have
Freitag, 12. März 2021 um 15:44:31 UTC+1:
>>
>>> I can't help directly with Debian, but Leo works fine on my VMs running
>>> both Mint and Ubuntu, which are both Debian-based. I would have thought
>>> that they use Debian packages directly, but maybe that's not so
C+1:
>
>> I can't help directly with Debian, but Leo works fine on my VMs running
>> both Mint and Ubuntu, which are both Debian-based. I would have thought
>> that they use Debian packages directly, but maybe that's not so.
>>
>> ...
>
>
>>
>&g
tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 12. März 2021 um 15:44:31 UTC+1:
> I can't help directly with Debian, but Leo works fine on my VMs running
> both Mint and Ubuntu, which are both Debian-based. I would have thought
> that they use Debian packages directly, but maybe that
I can't help directly with Debian, but Leo works fine on my VMs running
both Mint and Ubuntu, which are both Debian-based. I would have thought
that they use Debian packages directly, but maybe that's not so.
On Mint, I have only three Qt packages installed:
$python3 -m pip list |grep &qu
like to continue to use Leo as my
outliner & notebook.
Unfortunately I failed so far - and - am out of ideas now ...
What did I do so far:
* Failed initially to install Leo on Debian - See "Log-1"
* After upgrading Pip from version 18.1 to 21.0.1 I was able to install the
stable versio
like to continue to use Leo as my
outliner & notebook.
Unfortunately I failed so far - and - am out of ideas now ...
What did I do so far:
* Failed initially to install Leo on Debian - See "Log-1"
* After upgrading Pip from version 18.1 to 21.0.1 I was able to install the
stable versio
Ville M. Vainio wrote:
I'm willing to put in some work into making Leo end up in Debian (and
as a consequence, Ubuntu). It will mean more users (because people
find projects by browsing whats available in package repos), but I
think Leo may be ready for that - with the Qt gui, we shouldn't
Hello -- Your comments were rather strange (call that opinion if you wish;
I'll be more specific later), so I felt I needed to defer responding to
them. Overnight I think I've come to a clear understanding of what to say,
but it will have to wait til perhaps this evening after work.
Seth
On
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello -- Your comments were rather strange (call that opinion if you wish;
I'll be more specific later), so I felt I needed to defer responding to
them. Overnight I think I've come to a clear understanding of what
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.comwrote:
Arguments about licensing are somewhat futile - they mostly serve to
waste developer time and piss off people. FWIW, I think Leo's license
change to MIT solves the whole problem (i.e. MIT is not ambiguous in
any way,
On Feb 23, 11:00 am, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.comwrote:
Arguments about licensing are somewhat futile - they mostly serve to
waste developer time and piss off people. FWIW, I think Leo's license
change to
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.comwrote:
I said that the GPL serves a purpose, and RMS does as well.
On that statement, we shall have to agree to disagree.
On this topic, apparently you lack the ability to think in any other terms
than some other
To have any hope of changing my mind, you would have to explain, precisely,
how the GPL has, in fact, spurred the development of open software.
To the contrary, I think it is obvious that what is driving open software is
not some rebellion against forces of unfreedom. Instead, it is the
On Feb 22, 1:22 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I see no forces for unfreedom. Period. Companies have legitimate rights,
and no amount of extreme left-wing politics changes this fact.
Software companies are being run by businessmen. Software companies
exist to make profits.
There are plenty of examples where commercial software fills gaps in
the market not covered by open source code, but those gaps are
becoming smaller over time. I believe that programs that the majority
of computer users require will all become public domain high quality
code in the long run --
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:26 AM, zpcspm zpc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 22, 1:22 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I see no forces for unfreedom. Period. Companies have legitimate
rights,
and no amount of extreme left-wing politics changes this fact.
Software companies are
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm willing to put in some work into making Leo end up in Debian (and
as a consequence, Ubuntu). It will mean more users (because people
find projects by browsing whats available in package repos), but I
think Leo may
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
- License fixed (see my previous post)
I'll do this if need be. But I need much more convincing.
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations) -- or it's a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
wrote:
- License fixed (see my previous post)
I'll do this if need be. But I need much more convincing.
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations) -- or
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
wrote:
- License fixed (see my previous post)
I'll do this if need be. But I need much more convincing.
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations) -- or
On Feb 21, 2:26 pm, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.com wrote:
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations)
I am not going to waste time arguing. I agree with none of this.
Leo benefits in no way from the GPL or any other Open
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 2:26 pm, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.com wrote:
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations)
I am not going to waste time arguing. I agree
32 matches
Mail list logo
