- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: unknown HZ value message still appears in procps utils
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 06/07/2011 05:16 AM, LANOUX
On 09/04/2011 11:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 06/07/2011 05:16 AM, LANOUX Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed the unknown HZ value message still appears at boot
time and under some unpredictable circumstances when running the ps
command, even after applying the
While it's not really prevalent just yet, big ISPs are supposed to begin
to doing test roll-outs of IPv6 by the end of the year (if they haven't
already). Probably good to add an entry for the loopback at very least.
It's just ::1 localhost immediately under the existing 127.0.0.1 entry.
I'm
On Sep 5, 2011, at 2:13 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
I'm not really sure what to do about actual IPv6 entries as your prefix
will likely change when your router is rebooted unless ISPs start
handing out static /64s (the last 64 bits are stable as they are
assembled from the MAC address with FFFE
xinglp wrote:
This command
sed -i -e '/!done/i/ longArg = NULL;' popt/popt.c
create
/ longArg = NULL;
After finding the problem, I was a little to casual about fixing it.
Fixed.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Taken from cross-lfs:
sed -i 's@\(^#define DEFAULT_EDITOR_PROGRAM \).*@\1vi@' lib/config.h
Any reason not to do this in LFS?
I have never seen the use of an editor in diffutils, but I learn new
stuff all the time. The only place DEFAULT_EDITOR_PROGRAM is in the
code is
DJ Lucas wrote:
While it's not really prevalent just yet, big ISPs are supposed to begin
to doing test roll-outs of IPv6 by the end of the year (if they haven't
already). Probably good to add an entry for the loopback at very least.
It's just ::1 localhost immediately under the existing
On 09/05/2011 11:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have never seen the use of an editor in diffutils, but I learn new
stuff all the time. The only place DEFAULT_EDITOR_PROGRAM is in the
code is sdiff.
After some looking, I found Section 2.5.1 in the diffutils info page
about 'ed' scripts.
On 09/05/2011 12:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Does IPv6 run in conjunction with IPv4. I think it does. I don't
really understand all the issues with implementing IPv4.
I think that we should hold off for now (after LFS-7.0) until we get a
good handle on how it will be used. AFAIK, most
Okay, so here is a more thorough review as promised (about 20 times before).
Again, this is based mostly on my own observations formed over the past few
years. As we all know, ego can be a bitch, ;-) and I do feel that my own
work was disregarded in many ways, so I'd like to see input from
Nice! As you mentioned in an earlier post, I looked at the debian fork
of procps-utils which I didn't know the existence. It mainly contains
all patches from the mainline sources + lots of long options and their
updated manual pages. It also support control groups as displayed by ps
-o cgroup.
I
On 09/05/2011 11:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Taken from cross-lfs:
sed -i 's@\(^#define DEFAULT_EDITOR_PROGRAM \).*@\1vi@' lib/config.h
Any reason not to do this in LFS?
I have never seen the use of an editor in diffutils, but I learn new
stuff all the time. The only place
DJ Lucas wrote:
Okay, so here is a more thorough review as promised (about 20 times before).
Again, this is based mostly on my own observations formed over the past few
years. As we all know, ego can be a bitch, ;-) and I do feel that my own
work was disregarded in many ways, so I'd like to
it just prints
write: : No such file or directory
util-linux-2.19.1 works well
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
util-linux-2.19.1 works well
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 09/05/2011 07:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
LSB defined functions belong in /lib/lsb/init_functions so that
compliant
bootscripts work as expected. Do not include the LSB definitions directly in
the distro's functions file. Either source them in the distribution's
functions
16 matches
Mail list logo