Re: [lfs-dev] [LFS Trac] #3098: udev/systemd 183 is out

2012-05-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I've been able to build udevadm, udevd, and accelerometer in the new distribution. I had to build each file separately and come up with the link scripts, but none of the spurious packages are needed. I'll check the other libexec programs tomorrow. Optimally we need to get upstream to split th

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Ken Moffat wrote: > libudev.la has installed=no - I'm not sure exactly how it gets > installed, but we probably need to do the same because the following > are wrapper scripts for libtool files of the same name in .libs and > these will definitely all need to be correctly installed : > > accele

Re: [lfs-dev] [LFS Trac] #3098: udev/systemd 183 is out

2012-05-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:27:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Well there is also: > > sed -i -e "s,systemd.*-,,gi" man/udev.7 man/*udev*.8 >^ ^^ > :) > Yes, much nicer :) > And of course after installation: > > pushd /usr/share/man/man8 > mv

Re: [lfs-dev] [LFS Trac] #3098: udev/systemd 183 is out

2012-05-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
LFS Trac wrote: > Comment(by ken@…): > > For the man pages (without renaming until after the build/install), the > slackware sed isn't enough to catch the systemd\- items in the text, nor > the SYSTEMD\- header on systemd-udevd.8. The following sed fixes all of > this, and (applied before con

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:38:37PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > One bright note : although it uses a lot of libtool-foo in the > regular install, at the end of 'make' all the udev programs appear to > be ready for a conventional install, and libudev.la appears as if it > might be in a similar sta

Re: [lfs-dev] Fix Includes [WAS: Re: Wording fix]

2012-05-28 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 5/28/12 6:37 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 18:16 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> On 5/28/12 6:15 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >>> It's probably safer to add back the command that disables this script >>> but just make sure that our explanation for it is accurate. >> >> Oh, and s

Re: [lfs-dev] Fix Includes [WAS: Re: Wording fix]

2012-05-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 18:16 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 5/28/12 6:15 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > It's probably safer to add back the command that disables this script > > but just make sure that our explanation for it is accurate. > > Oh, and sorry for the trouble here, I realize I was t

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 05:07:17PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > For BLFS users who need gudev or any of the other parts that LFS > > can do without, it looks nastier. Do-able, but finding someone to > > build all the deps and then document how to install the other parts >

Re: [lfs-dev] Fix Includes [WAS: Re: Wording fix]

2012-05-28 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 5/28/12 6:15 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > I think we may have been too quick on the draw with removing this > command entirely. The reason being that this script was originally added > into gcc to "fix" non-ANSI headers in various packages. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/fixincludes/README

[lfs-dev] Fix Includes [WAS: Re: Wording fix]

2012-05-28 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 5/9/12 4:29 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:24 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > >> I'll dig a bit and get back to you. > > Note that I'm busy digging too. Having fixincludes run in chapter 5 > looks safe; GCC only searches for headers under /mnt/lfs/tools/include > or /tools/i

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > 8. The following have gone: > rule_generator.functions > write_cd_rules > write_net_rules I noticed that too, but they are all ascii. /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules reverences write_cd_rules, but there seems to be no similar function in -183. > man8/scsi_id

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:52:38PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Continuing this thread. > > I built a current SVN and stopped at udev. Trying to run systemd > configure is a problem. > > 1. It wants intltool > 2. It wants intltool's dependency XML::Parser > 3. It wants libpcap2 and implicitly

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 5/28/12 2:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> The problem is that none of these libraries are used for udev. On a >> recent blfs system, where the systemd dependent libraries are installed, >> I as able to build and looked at the executables and libraries. AFAIK, >> the only

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 5/28/12 2:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > The problem is that none of these libraries are used for udev. On a > recent blfs system, where the systemd dependent libraries are installed, > I as able to build and looked at the executables and libraries. AFAIK, > the only ones are /bin/udevadm, /usr/l

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report

2012-05-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Continuing this thread. I built a current SVN and stopped at udev. Trying to run systemd configure is a problem. 1. It wants intltool 2. It wants intltool's dependency XML::Parser 3. It wants libpcap2 and implicitly it's dependency attr 4. It wants pkgconfig but that can be worked around 4a