- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Mai 2013 19:25:18
> Objet: [lfs-dev] util-linux regression tests
>
> util-linux now has a test suite. In chroot, 'make check' fails
> because
> it is running as root.
> If I run as a non-root
- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 15 Mai 2013 20:16:58
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
>
> Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Mail original -
>
- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mardi 14 Mai 2013 20:59:08
> Objet: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
>
> 1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
> remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
>
- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Samedi 4 Mai 2013 18:13:35
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] Latest packages
>
>
> Actually, I want to know if a xz version exists. My order of preference
> is xz, bz2, gz. All the packages in LFS are one of thos
- Mail original -
> De: "Jeff Higgins"
> À: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 29 Avril 2013 16:09:29
> Objet: [lfs-dev] Zlib source link broken
>
> http://www.zlib.net/zlib-1.2.7.tar.bz2
> seems to be broken
> it looks like a new version was introduced yesterday
>
zlib-1.2.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Benton"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:40:03 +
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > I'm having a problem with why this is happening.
>
> Me too...
>
> > The jhalfs vanil
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Util-linux arch command
> Matt Burgess wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:33 +0100, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Util-linux arch command
> > ◦[randy] - Added three configure parameters to the Chapter 6
> > Util-linux-ng instructions so that additional program
- Original Message -
From: "Gilles Espinasse"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] zlib 1.2.6 incompatibilities
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tobias Gasser"
> To:
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Gasser"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:27 AM
Subject: [lfs-dev] zlib 1.2.6 incompatibilities
>
> zlib 1.2.6 seems to have some issues.
>
> building partimage 0.6.9 fails with several errors in imagefile.cpp
>
> error cannot convert 'gzFile_s**
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Huntwork"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-177 & Kmod-3 WIP patch
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> >
> > I'd be curious what's in /proc/mounts as well, but eh wh
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Static libs [was Re: r9703...]
> If we do get rid of these, there is some fun and games for libz in
> module-init-tools and for libcrypt in sysvinit
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: gmp 5.0.2 - 6.14 svn-08
> Tobias Gasser wrote:
> > t-get_d fails here
> >
> > the first 9 test run fine
> > then 1 of 30 fail
> > no more tests are run
Here is a patch that fix a few typo on r9632
Gilles
typo-fixes.patch
Description: Binary data
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: "unknown HZ value" message still appears in procps utils
> DJ Lucas wrote:
> > On 06/07/2011 05:16 AM, LANOUX Bertrand wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have n
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Landley"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Cc: "Bruce Dubbs"
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: 6.8 patch tweaks.
...
>
> Ok, bug in busybox I should fix. Still, the patch doesn't need two
> consecutive slashes in it triggering this bug
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 1:30 AM
Subject: r9569 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01
> + [bdubbs] - Update to iprout2-2.6.39. Fixes
s/iprout2/iproute2/
Gilles
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: a bug in the perl patch
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > On 27/06/2011 02:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> >> I also see a change in
> >>
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org
Changelog say one patch was applied but patch is not there.
--- psmisc-22.13/ChangeLog 2010-07-14 10:11:16.0 +0200
+++ psmisc-22.14/ChangeLog 2011-06-20 13:37:23.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
+Changes in 22.14
...
+ * fuser -m -s flags work - Patch by jgorig SF#31110178 RH#651794
In f
Selon LANOUX Bertrand :
> Hi all,
>
> I have noticed the "unknown HZ value" message still appears at boot time and
> under some unpredictable circumstances when running the ps command, even
> after applying the procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch (I currently use a SMP,
> 2.6.38.4 tickless kernel).
Selon Lars Nielsen :
> Hey,
> Maybe a little off-topic. :-s
>
> Can I use the c code from the menu/ folder in jhalfs in my own project
> to make a similar configuration menu?
>
> Are there some extra documantation to this ncurses based menu-system?
>
> Regards
>
> Lars Nielsen
>
That should come f
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: LFS SVN-20110204 error report
...
> > I'll file a bug, but I doubt it will be addressed.
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12469
>
>-- B
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: LFS SVN-20110204 error report
> Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>
> > The script I send run until test fail. This vary from 1 to 150
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: LFS SVN-20110204 error report
...
> glibc:
> >>> Did you have a random result at during glibc .configure with this test
> >>> checking whether ranlib is
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: LFS SVN-20110204 error report
>
> I think we should build a relatively complete system for c,c++.
> Avoiding an error message by not building a portion of t
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 6:02 PM
Subject: LFS SVN-20110204 error report
> On my most recent automated build, I have errors in four packages.
>
> gcc:
>libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx
>libmudflap.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: glibc issues with --enable-kernel=2.6.22.5
> Here are more specific, but a little clearer seds:
>
> sed -i '213 s/PRIVATE_FUTEX/FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME/' \
>
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: glibc issues with --enable-kernel=2.6.22.5
...
>> what about changing that glibc configure line into something like:
>> enable-kernel=`uname -r | awk -F. '{ p
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: glibc issues with --enable-kernel=2.6.22.5
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:13:21 -0600, Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
> > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11
Selon Sven Goericke :
>
> From: Gilles Espinasse
> Subject: Re: kernel > 2.6.36 and ntfs-3g mce-error
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:48:08 +0100
>
>
> I use the proprietary Nvidia Driver 260.19.29. The nouveau driver is no
> option for me as i need OpenGL 3D-A
Selon Sven Goericke :
> Hi,
>
> i've built the lfs-svn version from december 23th with the latest 2.6.36
> Kernel.
> The system runs well until i installed ntfs-3g and mounted a NTFS-partiton.
>
> Mounting the partition, after vew minutes (approx. 2 or 3) the system freezes
> (the screen blanks an
- Original Message -
From: "David Jensen"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: 6.16 gcc omit-frame pointer
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:38:06 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > David Jensen wrote:
> >
> > > The point of the thread is that the 'chapter 5 gcc pass 2' a
- Original Message -
From: "David Jensen"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: 6.16 gcc omit-frame pointer
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:38:06 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > David Jensen wrote:
> >
> > > The point of the thread is that the 'chapter 5 gcc pass 2' a
- Original Message -
From: "DJ Lucas"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in sort with Coreutils-8.7
> On 11/25/2010 12:17 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> > On 11/25/2010 12:14 AM, Stuart Stegall wrote:
> >> x86, arm, ppc64, a
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: IANA-Etc links broken (for now)
> DJ Lucas wrote:
> > On 11/22/2010 06:12 PM, William Immendorf wrote:
> >> Pretty recently, the download location for IANA-e
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Glibc vulnerability . . . implications for LFS?
> DJ Lucas wrote:
> > On 10/26/2010 04:51 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >> Thanks DJ! Was that in conjunction
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schmidt
To: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 6:23 PM
Subject: Question regarding Chapter 5 Bzip2 build
> Hi everyone!
>
>
> I have a question regarding Chapter 5 Bzip2 build.
> When you compile Bzip2 you only issue make. Bu
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: pkg-config problem
...
> The patch was what upstream changed. I'm happy with anything
> that does the exact same thing because I don't have to retest it.
Selon Andrew Benton :
> On 16/08/10 08:28, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> > Except this fix is not the right one, see
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg137741.html
> > and the real fix should be the patch in the next message from that thread.
> >
> The way I read
Selon Matthew Burgess :
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:02:39 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> > On 15/08/10 13:22, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> the currect version of iproute2 seems to have a little bug. This bug
> > causes the "ip route get x.x.x.x" command to print nothing. Very unuseful
> > (e
Selon Thomas Trepl :
> Hi
>
> the currect version of iproute2 seems to have a little bug. This bug causes
> the "ip route get x.x.x.x" command to print nothing. Very unuseful
> (especially
> when using vpnc which relies on that output)...
>
> Attached a small patch, maybe a sed could do same. Btw,
Selon Jeremy Huntwork :
> FYI,
>
> The new version of sysvinit you've added to the dev book includes a
> binary not listed in the book (at least on x86_64, I assume it's not
> arch-specific): /sbin/fstab-decode
>
> Jeremy
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://ww
Selon Bruce Dubbs :
> é·æº wrote:
> > Hi,
> > make all-recursive
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/blfs-sources/cvs-1.11.23'
> > Making all in lib
> > make[2]: Entering directory `/blfs-sources/cvs-1.11.23/lib'
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -g -O2 -MT getline.o -MD -MP -MF
> > .
I was working on libtool upgrade for my system, following what LFS has done.
libtool is compiled only once in chap6, and long after it has been used for
those chap6 compilation : glibc, binutils, gmp, mpfr, gcc, pkg-config, ncurses,
util-linux-ng
That mean we rely on host libtool to be good enoug
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: Warning re Expect
> Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>
> > I made a patch last year that allow to compile 5.44.1.13 without tk.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: Warning re Expect
> Robert Xu wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:51, Burton Strauss III
> > wrote:
> >> Whenever the next time somebody updates this package
- Original Message -
From: "Petersen Liman"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: LFS-6.6 - Old bug in bash has returned
>>>
>>> Can someone confirm? This was an old bug that seems to have returned in
>>> LFS-6.6. When you use color escap
- Original Message -
From: "DJ Lucas"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 8:29 AM
Subject: LFS-6.6 - Old bug in bash has returned
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Can someone confirm? This was an old bug that seems to have returned in
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Connolly"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2010 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: fun about re_compile_pattern test result
On Friday May 28 2010 04:46:13 pm Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>> Looking at the difference
Looking at the difference between diffutils-2.9/3.0 compilation log, I find
this
grep re_compile_pattern ./*
./coreutils-8.5:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
./diffutils-2.9:checking for working re_compile_pattern... no
./diffutils-3.0:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
.
Selon Ken Moffat :
> On 10 May 2010 07:41, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ken Moffat"
> > To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 10:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: gmp note
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: gmp note (#2648)
> >
>
> For x86_64-capable CPUs (pedantically, I don't think this is an issue on
> other 64-bit-capable architectures) I see no benefit in specif
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 6:37 PM
Subject: gmp note (#2648)
> Moving this here from trac. When I put the ABI=32 note in, I
> screwed up. But it's only 2 weeks ago that anyone noticed.
>
> In the meantime, building for x86_64 is now suppor
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: gmp note (#2648)
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Moving this here from trac. When I put the ABI=32 note in, I
> > screwed up. But it's only 2 weeks ago that anyone notic
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 5:46 AM
Subject: r9259 - in trunk/BOOK/bootscripts/contrib/lsb-v3: . init.d
===
> --- trunk/BOOK/bootscripts/contrib/lsb-v3/README 2010-04-23 17:50:25 UTC
(re
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:05 AM
Subject: perl-5.12.0
> Trying perl-5.12.0 with the current LFS Chapter 5 instructions, I get
> the errors below. I tried with gcc-4.5.0 and then backed off to LFS-6.5
> and
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: klogd and System.map
> linux fan wrote:
> > On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a
> >> s
Selon kevin631012 :
> in chapter 6.32. Perl-5.10.1
> without using patch
> patch -Np1 -i ../perl-5.10.1-libc-1.patch
> will cause compile issue
>
> kevinskliu
>
No that should not.
You probably have PATH wrongly set starting chap6.
Gilles
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
LFS since a long time install killall, fuser, peekfd in /bin for the reason
that those are commands used in initscript.
But only killall is used in lfs bootscripts, and only in sendsignals
sendsignals is installed in S60 for shutdown, this imply that fs is already
mounted.
Debian, Gentoo, Fedora,
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: Util-Linux _NG 2.16-rc2
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:06:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
> > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:37:20 -0500, Bruce
gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h contain the define for the linker
GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER "/lib/ld.so.1"
But gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h does not contain that define.
LFS does not support powerpc, so that's useless to adjust the linker in that
file.
Greg only add STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR and STANDARD_STARTFILE_PR
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Dalziel"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:37 PM
Subject: e2fsprogs-1.41.7 hardcoded path
> e2fsprogs no longer hard codes rm in lib/blkid/test_probe.in. I rolled
> back a few versions to check when this happened and it was 1.41.6. The
> test executes
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: GCC 4.4.0 XCFLAGS
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:55:50 +0100, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> > It seems that GCC no longer contains XCFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in.
Instead,
> >
Hello
I wanted to look at some 6.3 instructions but 6.3 is missing in lfs-museum
download section.
Only available as a german on-line translation
Gilles
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information p
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: Util-linux-ng-2.16-rc1 in Chapter 5
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:33:17 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
> > I was experimenting with Util-linux-ng-2.16-rc1 and we may
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan Kadzban"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: udev test suite?
>> chap 6.56.1 say
>> This package does not come with a test suite.
>>
>> Appendix C say
>> Udev
>> Installation depends on: Binutils, Coreutil
chap 6.56.1 say
This package does not come with a test suite.
Appendix C say
Udev
Installation depends on: Binutils, Coreutils, GCC, Glibc, and Make
Test suite depends on: Findutils, Perl, and Sed
Must be installed before: None
Gilles
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Util-Linux-NG-2.15.1 vs. e2fsprogs
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:48:44 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
> > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >
> >> do we simply forget about U
Selon Tobias Gasser :
> Bruce Dubbs schrieb:
> > Static linking for this is OK with me, but do we know all the packages that
> use
> > libuuid?
>
>
> i don't link anything static. i move all .a files out of the library
> path if there is a corresponding .so available.
>
> excptions are the modutil
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Gasser"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: kernel compression with lzma
...
> as the kernel compile does not check wether lzma is possible but just
> starts compiling resulting in a failure at the very
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: glibc-2.10.1 make check fails
...
>
> Using 2.6.18 appears to potentially affect binaries built against kernels
older
> than that and run on a LFS-6.5 or later sy
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Nicholson"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: glibc-2.10.1 make check fails
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Bryan Kadzban
> wrote:
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> --enable-kernel=VERSION compile for compat
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: coreutils instructions
...
> > I use bash all the time and I wouldn't consider using a minimal posix
shell
> > for my login shell. For any non-trivial script,
- Original Message -
From: "Gilles Espinasse"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: ICA/Farce
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ken Moffat"
> To: "LFS Developers Mailingl
Selon Greg Schafer :
> > Author: jim
> > Log:
> > Creating of CLFS Native Structure
>
As a listener of (in alphabetical order) CLFS, DIY, HLFS, LFS , I am very
disappointed by the bad atmosphere between some authors and surprised from so
much resentment.
I understand some may prefer a way to do a
Selon Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> 5. Ticket 2033. Include support for initramfs. Would this require a
> separate branch, and can it be worked on in parallel to other changes,
> or is it better to wait until other above changes are sorted out?
>
We have initramfs working on IPCop (with
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Huntwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: LFS 6.4: Helped me with with "/tools/bin/ld: cannot
find-lgcc_eh " in Chapter 5.7 Patch for glibc --]
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > B
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Huntwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: The value of 64-bit vs 32-bit
...
> The only consideration, to my mind, would then be: should LFS worry
> about providing multilib supp
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: The value of 64-bit vs 32-bit
...
> > * Any comments on the details provided in the above article,
> > specifically in how that might relat
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 7:16 PM
Subject: GMP & MPFR think I'm cross compiling!
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to compile LFS trunk + local package update patches under a
Windows host, Kubuntu-8.10 guest Virtualbox e
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS-Dev"
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:08 PM
Subject: Book XML design specs, extending LFS
...
> as well - for instance, distcc support in jhalfs would be a wonderful
> thing (I've been using it with good suc
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: hang in gettext tests
...
> > -William
> Maybe it's just my box, dunno. I'm currently in my third fresh
> build of chapter 6, and the p
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Gasser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: Perl error
...
>
> i never bevor had to add -Dusedl to get dynamic libraries.
> the failure in test with dynaloader seem to make the sa
Selon Tobias Gasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> second try. the first with attached logfiles (194kb) seems to hang
> arround somewhere since 3 hours now. if anybody wants to help me, please
> send a mail and i'll send you the logfiles.
>
You should post an url where the log file could be loaded.
Mail
Selon Tobias Gasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> im sticking with perl 5.10.0 (chapter 6.26)
>
>
> ** log stdout:
> cc -o miniperl \
> `echo gv.o toke.o perly.o op.o pad.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o
> reentr.o mro.o hv.o av.o perl.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o
> pp_ctl.o pp_sys.o doo
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Gasser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 5:21 PM
Subject: gmp required ABI=32
> i had to add ABI=32 as my system was identified ad 64bit.
>
> ./configure ABI=32 --prefix=/usr --enable-cxx --enable-mpbsd
>
> i'm using CFLAGS="
Selon John Frankish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
>
> The ps3 cell processor is 64bit, but ydl-6 is compiled 32bit. Due to
> the ps3 memory limitation - 256MB - I'm not sure building a 64bit lfs
> system would be a good idea...
>
> John
>
I don't think we support the full compilation from a 64b cpu to
Selon John Frankish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> My apologies if this is the wrong list for this post..
>
> Due to the fact that lfs SVN-20081028 uses gcc-4.3 and a 2.6.27
> kernel, which both contain various ps3 specific optimisation
> possibilities, I'm very interested by the idea of building
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: ICA/Farce
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:36:07PM +0100, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> >
Selon Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
>
> Archaic saw unresolved differences for x86 with gcc-4.1.2.
> Actually, looking at his results (they're at ~/archaic) they look
> pretty good - blkid.tab.old and locale-archive should probably now
> be expected to differ, and they were the only differe
Selon Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
>
> The actual implementation mostly involves preparing to diff/cmp, and
> is probably better explained by the comments in gsbuild. Look at the
> bottom of the functions file for do_ica_prep() and do_ica_work().
>
>
http://cvs.diy-linux.org/index.cgi/gs
Selon Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
> >
> > Personally, whenever I create a patch I find it hard to create an
> > *appropriate* name. Often, putting 'fix' in the name helps me
> > understand what it is for without looking at the content. I find it
> > hard to see *why* restricting "f
Selon Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
>
> In an *ideal* world, I still think that building the kernel version
> used in LFS on the host is the way to go. Doesn't fit every usage,
> but it has to be a lot better than attempting to support people
> building from some antique version of 2.6.
LF
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Huntwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Using m4 in the temporary tools and installing it after
autoconfin chapter 6 makes a tool of a autoconf link to the m4 in /tools
> Bruce
- Original Message -
From: "Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Udev Rules
> > > > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > > >> I'd prefer to follow upstream and put the Udev supplied default
rules
> > >
Selon Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >> I'd prefer to follow upstream and put the Udev supplied default rules in
> /lib/udev/rules.d.
> >
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > > I say keep them in /etc.
> >
> > Do we flip a coin? :-)
> >
> > Actually, I
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: iana-etc with STRIP=yes
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:51:04 -0700, "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > "barf" is my standard "m
Selon "Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Em Tuesday 07 October 2008 13:05:44 Dan Nicholson escreveu:
> >
> > Whenever you do a getservbyname(), the glibc resolver has to parse out
> > /etc/services. This happens when you use "http", and the resolver has
> > to decide what port num
Selon Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. wrote:
> > Not a major issue, but a recent thread shows using the make STRIP=yes on
> > iana-etc to cut out comments and accelerate the port search on port
> > resolution. In the new LSF does anyone remember to put this on the
At least on iana-etc-2.30, there is a STRIP option that remove all comments.
Time to resolve protocol name lineary depend of /etc/services file size
See
http://www.diy-linux.org/pipermail/diy-linux-dev/2006-January/000719.html
or
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2004-07/046
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
