Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/4/07, M.Canales.es [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió: Manuel, I know that you have been working hard on the updates, but options 2 and 3 seem to be even more work. On top of that, I suspect we will want to go to the next stable

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-05 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 5 de Julio de 2007 15:40, Dan Nicholson escribió: I think this would be the best. It gives maximum flexibility if the stylesheets we use are local to our repos. This also solves the issue of people having different versions of the stylesheets installed. So long as someone (Manuel)

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-05 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió: Do you have any insight into why there will be no 1.72.1 release? Apart the comments in the commits and some developer's post in docbook-apps saying that 1.73.0 will be released soon. I think that the main reason that they have

[nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread M.Canales.es
Hi, As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting the release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1. The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release, but a new beta DocBook-XSL-1.73.0 that may contains several bugs due very intrusive changes on how the

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
M.Canales.es wrote: Hi, As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting the release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1. The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release, but a new beta DocBook-XSL-1.73.0 that may contains several bugs due very

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 07/04/07 15:34 CST: 1. - Wait up to the next *.1 release to start using the new code. That could meant to wait at least other 3-4 months :-/ 2.- To create our own LFS-XSL-1.0 package based on current new-xsl branch code and use it as a temporally

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/04/07 15:59 CST: My initial reaction is that option 1 is best for the overall project. I typed a long essay in reply to Manuel's question agreeing with Bruce. However, just as I was finishing it, I thought well, since Manuel is the one doing all the work,

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 21:34:05 M.Canales.es wrote: Hi, As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting the release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1. The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release That's obviously not the news any of us were

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió: I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any of our books - in fact, keeping them around would probably make diffs between

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 22:37:01 M.Canales.es wrote: El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió: I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any of our books - in fact,

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:49, Matthew Burgess escribió: Well, I took a look at the Relax-NG stuff a while back and hit a bug in libxml2 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413248). That pretty much stops any work on migrating the stylesheets to be Relax-NG friendly. Actualy