On 7/4/07, M.Canales.es [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Manuel,
I know that you have been working hard on the updates, but options 2
and 3 seem to be even more work. On top of that, I suspect we will want
to go to the next stable
El Jueves, 5 de Julio de 2007 15:40, Dan Nicholson escribió:
I think this would be the best. It gives maximum flexibility if the
stylesheets we use are local to our repos. This also solves the issue
of people having different versions of the stylesheets installed. So
long as someone (Manuel)
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Do you have any insight into why there will be no 1.72.1 release?
Apart the comments in the commits and some developer's post in docbook-apps
saying that 1.73.0 will be released soon. I think that the main reason that
they have
Hi,
As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting the
release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1.
The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release, but a new
beta DocBook-XSL-1.73.0 that may contains several bugs due very intrusive
changes on how the
M.Canales.es wrote:
Hi,
As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting
the
release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1.
The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release, but a new
beta DocBook-XSL-1.73.0 that may contains several bugs due very
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 07/04/07 15:34 CST:
1. - Wait up to the next *.1 release to start using the new code. That could
meant to wait at least other 3-4 months :-/
2.- To create our own LFS-XSL-1.0 package based on current new-xsl branch
code and use it as a temporally
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/04/07 15:59 CST:
My initial reaction is that option 1 is best for the overall project.
I typed a long essay in reply to Manuel's question agreeing with
Bruce. However, just as I was finishing it, I thought well, since
Manuel is the one doing all the work,
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 21:34:05 M.Canales.es wrote:
Hi,
As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting
the release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1.
The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release
That's obviously not the news any of us were
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió:
I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we
necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any
of our books - in fact, keeping them around would probably make diffs
between
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 22:37:01 M.Canales.es wrote:
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió:
I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we
necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any
of our books - in fact,
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:49, Matthew Burgess escribió:
Well, I took a look at the Relax-NG stuff a while back and hit a bug in
libxml2 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413248). That pretty
much stops any work on migrating the stylesheets to be Relax-NG friendly.
Actualy
11 matches
Mail list logo