Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-21 Thread Anderson Lizardo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Burgess wrote: > Anderson Lizardo wrote: > >> Yes, the lfswww group is still needed (and it needs to be synced >> everytime commits privileges are given to someone). > > > Thanks. For some reason I was confusing the 'cvslfs' and 'lfswww' >

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Burgess
Anderson Lizardo wrote: Yes, the lfswww group is still needed (and it needs to be synced everytime commits privileges are given to someone). Thanks. For some reason I was confusing the 'cvslfs' and 'lfswww' groups last night, and it was the 'cvs' related groups I was concerned about still h

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Anderson Lizardo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: > >> Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> >>> Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups. >> >> >> >> Is lfswww still being used for website stuff? If so I'd rather it die >> a quick death by hav

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Justin Knierim
Randy McMurchy wrote: Is the clock on your machine perhaps running about 20 minutes fast? Thanks a lot Randy, it was indeed fast. Fixed now. Justin -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups. Is lfswww still being used for website stuff? If so I'd rather it die a quick death by having any scripts or other files to be owned by svnwww instead. Yes, I believe it's still b

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups. Is lfswww still being used for website stuff? If so I'd rather it die a quick death by having any scripts or other files to be owned by svnwww instead. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailm

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: Anyway, sure, I'm volunteering again. :-) OK, that's great, thanks. You've now got commit privs to the website repository (www2), so feel free to tackle it whenever you have the time. If you're not subscribed to website@linuxfromscratch.org, you might want to do tha

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: Wow, I must have been in an "Thou shalt not delegate anything" mood at the time! If you are still willing to maintain it, that'd be great, if not I'll open the position up for someone else to take on. Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups. -- J

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Randy McMurchy
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/19/05 14:29 CST: > Wow, I must have been in an "Thou shalt not delegate anything" mood at > the time! If you are still willing to maintain it, that'd be great, if > not I'll open the position up for someone else to take on. Not sure it was like that, but

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/19/05 13:55 CST: There are others that are just as outdated. Anyway, just thought I'd mention it. I don't have the time to put into it, but perhaps someone else does? Months ago I volunteered to Matt to maintain the FAQ, but he po

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Randy McMurchy wrote: Justin Knierim wrote these words on 09/19/05 14:20 CST: [snip] Is the clock on your machine perhaps running about 20 minutes fast? Justin actually lives in the future. You didn't know? ;) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Randy McMurchy wrote: Months ago I volunteered to Matt to maintain the FAQ, but he politely said that it didn't need a maintainer and to just in patches to -dev for any updates I felt might be needed. Hrm. That sounds somewhat familiar. Though I had forgotten it if I had read it. Well, the

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Randy McMurchy
Justin Knierim wrote these words on 09/19/05 14:20 CST: [snip] Is the clock on your machine perhaps running about 20 minutes fast? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:04:00 up 170 days, 13:

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Justin Knierim
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: There are others that are just as outdated. Anyway, just thought I'd mention it. I don't have the time to put into it, but perhaps someone else does? I would volunteer but feel unfit for the job as I don't do much support via lfs-support or #lfs-support. Until then I

Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/19/05 13:55 CST: > There are others that are just as outdated. Anyway, just thought I'd > mention it. I don't have the time to put into it, but perhaps someone > else does? Months ago I volunteered to Matt to maintain the FAQ, but he politely said that it

FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-19 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hey Guys, The FAQ needs some attention. And it would be nice if we had someone to maintain it regularly again. For example: "Kernel panic: VFS: unable to mount root fs There are several reasons why the kernel might be unable to mount the root filesystem. * Did you specify the c