Re: ICA/LFS-Alpha Status Update [Was: Re: LFS-Alphabetical ICA/Farce Results]

2006-01-05 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Dan Nicholson wrote: > Until they finally kick me off their server, I've got a little repo of > stuff trying to track my work on this: > > http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/ Thanks again, Dan. I've merged all recent changes from trunk into the alphabetical branch, and I took some small

Re: ICA/LFS-Alpha Status Update [Was: Re: LFS-Alphabetical ICA/Farce Results]

2006-01-04 Thread Chris Staub
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Dan, Chris: I see you guys have done a lot of work over the past week. Thank you very much for that. I'm having a little trouble sorting through the hundreds of emails in my Inbox today and pinpointing exactly what changes are ready to go into the alpha branch. Would

Re: ICA/LFS-Alpha Status Update [Was: Re: LFS-Alphabetical ICA/Farce Results]

2006-01-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/4/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you guys mind giving me a little summary of the progress of the > last week? Also, Chris, I believe you have a patch for the book, right? > Which is the current one? Until they finally kick me off their server, I've got a little repo of

ICA/LFS-Alpha Status Update [Was: Re: LFS-Alphabetical ICA/Farce Results]

2006-01-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Dan Nicholson wrote: OK, but in this case it was useful. Putting bison in Ch.5, and moving flex before bison in Ch. 6 has cleared up the ICA differences. Later I'll actually look at the bison source a bit to confirm this, but I'm pretty sure there's a circular dependency here. flex uses bison,