Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-05 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 5 de Julio de 2007 15:40, Dan Nicholson escribió: > I think this would be the best. It gives maximum flexibility if the > stylesheets we use are local to our repos. This also solves the issue > of people having different versions of the stylesheets installed. So > long as someone (Manue

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-05 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > > Do you have any insight into why there will be no 1.72.1 release? > Apart the comments in the commits and some developer's post in docbook-apps saying that 1.73.0 will be released soon. I think that the main reason that they have

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/4/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > > > Manuel, > > I know that you have been working hard on the updates, but options 2 > > and 3 seem to be even more work. On top of that, I suspect we will want > > to go to the n

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:49, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Well, I took a look at the Relax-NG stuff a while back and hit a bug in > libxml2 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413248). That pretty > much stops any work on migrating the stylesheets to be Relax-NG friendly. Actual

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 22:37:01 M.Canales.es wrote: > El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió: > > I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we > > necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any > > of our books - in fa

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 23:29, Matthew Burgess escribió: > I also think this is the way we should proceed. I'm not sure that we > necessarily need to remove files that we don't require for a build of any > of our books - in fact, keeping them around would probably make diffs > between up

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 4 de Julio de 2007 22:59, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > Manuel, > I know that you have been working hard on the updates, but options 2 > and 3 seem to be even more work. On top of that, I suspect we will want > to go to the next stable release when it is available, so a lot of the > wor

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 21:34:05 M.Canales.es wrote: > Hi, > > As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting > the release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1. > > The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release That's obviously not the news any of us were

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/04/07 15:59 CST: > My initial reaction is that option 1 is best for the overall project. I typed a long essay in reply to Manuel's question agreeing with Bruce. However, just as I was finishing it, I thought "well, since Manuel is the one doing all the work, wh

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 07/04/07 15:34 CST: > 1. - Wait up to the next *.1 release to start using the new code. That could > meant to wait at least other 3-4 months :-/ > > 2.- To create our own LFS-XSL-1.0 package based on current new-xsl branch > code and use it as a temporally so

Re: [nex-xsl] What to do?

2007-07-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
M.Canales.es wrote: > Hi, > > As you know, the new XSL stylesheets are ready for production time waiting > the > release of stable DocBook-XSL-1.72.1. > > The bad news it that there will be no DocBook-XSL-1.72.1 release, but a new > beta DocBook-XSL-1.73.0 that may contains several bugs due ve