Re: [lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
On 2020-06-21 13:24 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > On 2020-06-20 21:24 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 6/20/20 8:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > On 6/20/20 7:07 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 2020-06-20 16:58 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > > On

Re: [lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
On 2020-06-20 21:24 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On 6/20/20 8:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > On 6/20/20 7:07 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > > On 2020-06-20 16:58 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 6/20/20 2:42 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > > The discussion

Re: [lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 6/20/20 8:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 6/20/20 7:07 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: On 2020-06-20 16:58 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: On 6/20/20 2:42 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: The discussion with Frans de Boer in lfs-support shown that the environment variables from host

Re: [lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 6/20/20 7:07 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: On 2020-06-20 16:58 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: On 6/20/20 2:42 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: The discussion with Frans de Boer in lfs-support shown that the environment variables from host can catch us completely off guard. Though

Re: [lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
On 2020-06-20 16:58 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On 6/20/20 2:42 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > The discussion with Frans de Boer in lfs-support shown that the environment > > variables from host can catch us completely off guard. Though in his case > > the > > problem is that he

Re: [lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 6/20/20 2:42 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: The discussion with Frans de Boer in lfs-support shown that the environment variables from host can catch us completely off guard. Though in his case the problem is that he forgot to create /home/lfs/.bash_profile, normally /etc/bash.bashrc would

[lfs-dev] proposal: prevent the influence of host /etc/bash.bashrc

2020-06-20 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
The discussion with Frans de Boer in lfs-support shown that the environment variables from host can catch us completely off guard. Though in his case the problem is that he forgot to create /home/lfs/.bash_profile, normally /etc/bash.bashrc would be more dangerous (the book has no consideration

Re: [lfs-dev] perl install options

2020-06-20 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 07:05:24AM -0700, Joel Bion via lfs-dev wrote: > Upgrading Perl was the trigger for me building my own package dependency > tracker utility. With tons of manual configuration, I am able to upgrade any > subset of packages at one time. It tells me what I need to rebuild,

Re: [lfs-dev] perl install options

2020-06-20 Thread Joel Bion via lfs-dev
Upgrading Perl was the trigger for me building my own package dependency tracker utility. With tons of manual configuration, I am able to upgrade any subset of packages at one time. It tells me what I need to rebuild, in what order. Some packages trigger no or few rebuilds. Others, like

Re: [lfs-dev] perl install options

2020-06-20 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: > Hi all, > > this is about hte configuration options of perl. > > Problem: > whenever perl is upgraded to a newer version (for example 5.30.2 to > 5.30.3), all perl modules needs to be reinstalled as the current >

[lfs-dev] perl install options

2020-06-20 Thread Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev
Hi all, this is about hte configuration options of perl. Problem: whenever perl is upgraded to a newer version (for example 5.30.2 to 5.30.3), all perl modules needs to be reinstalled as the current configuration of perl forces a directory structure like /usr /lib /perl5 /5.30.2

[lfs-dev] is "+h" really needed in chroot?

2020-06-20 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
There was a paragraph in sect. 7.4 "Entering the Chroot Environment", reading: > Notice that /tools/bin is not > in the PATH. This means that a temporary tool will no longer be > used once its final version is installed. It does not make sense now as the final version will overwrite the