On 6/18/20 2:15 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
Thanks. This is "just" a typo here, but I guess we'll find some more
errors: a big rewrite like that implies two very different tasks:
- make the instructions work (lot of trial and error)
- keep the text in sync with the instructions (not a
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:16, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> Why "environment"? I'm not sure here.
I wasn't sure either.
Was probably taking my cue from "7.4. Entering the Chroot Environment "
> We really save the tools.
> And what we "clean up" is not really an environment (rather we
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 12:37 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 22:01, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > Please tell us what you think of:
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~pierre/lfs-svn/index.html
> > (I've not bee able to remove the latin numbering in the
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 22:01, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> Please tell us what you think of:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~pierre/lfs-svn/index.html
> (I've not bee able to remove the latin numbering in the "Preliminary
> material")
Seems a much better separation of the "introducto
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 19:58 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 20:01, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > > I'd like to see the "cross-compiling 101" sections, so
> > >
> > > Introduction
> > > Toolchain Technical Notes
> > > General Compilation Instructions
> > >
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 20:01, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see the "cross-compiling 101" sections, so
> >
> > Introduction
> > Toolchain Technical Notes
> > General Compilation Instructions
> >
> > in "chapter" 5, separated out from the package build sections there.
>
> We can
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 19:28 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 18:34, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > OTOH, personally, I like meson/ninja. I wish it were used more
> > often.
> > They have nothing to do with systemd.
>
> For some reason, I had thought that
On 6/15/20 6:28 AM, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
Might I playfully suggest that LFS should find a package that could
optionally be built with CMake, so as to introduce new readers to that
build system here too, rather than making them wait for that joy in
BLFS.
It has been considered, but
On 6/15/20 2:09 AM, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 20:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/cross2-lfs-book/
Was
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 18:34, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> OTOH, personally, I like meson/ninja. I wish it were used more often.
> They have nothing to do with systemd.
For some reason, I had thought that there was a package in the SysD
build that was "so new" that it had never had an a
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 15:09 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 20:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
> > overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
> >
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~
On 2020-06-15 15:09 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 20:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
> > overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
> >
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/c
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 20:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
> overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/cross2-lfs-book/
>
Was there an SVN reference (branch) to pull the sour
On Jun 14, 2020 9:35 AM, "Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev" <
lfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
> Hmm, having iana-etc does not change anything to the
> "22_locale/time_get/..." failures, and there is still one
> failure in experimental/net/internet/resolver, even with a real
> /etc/host inst
On 6/14/20 11:41 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-06-14 10:49 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
On 6/14/20 8:35 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may
On 2020-06-14 10:49 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 6/14/20 8:35 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may allow
> > > tests to pass, as reported by
On 6/14/20 8:35 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may allow
tests to pass, as reported by Joe Locash. If so, I'll commit it.
Hmm, having iana-etc does not chan
On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 22:03 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 2020-06-14 15:35 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may
> > > allow
> > > tests t
On 2020-06-14 15:35 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may allow
> > tests to pass, as reported by Joe Locash. If so, I'll commit it.
> >
>
> Hmm, having ia
On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may allow
> tests to pass, as reported by Joe Locash. If so, I'll commit it.
>
Hmm, having iana-etc does not change anything to the
"22_locale/time_get/..." failure
On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 15:10 +0100, spiky via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 13/06/2020 13:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> > In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a
> > major
> > overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
> >
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/cross2-l
On Jun 13, 2020 8:46 AM, "Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev" <
lfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
> In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/cross2-lfs-book/
Bruce,
Can you make
On 13/06/2020 13:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/cross2-lfs-book/
The elements of building LFS using cross compiling techniques have
c
In the last few weeks, the LFS editors have been working on a major
overhaul of LFS. This work can be reviewed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/cross2-lfs-book/
The elements of building LFS using cross compiling techniques have
changed a lot. The old Chapter 5 has been split into t
24 matches
Mail list logo
