Hi all,
I started working on LFS 7.2 and I get the following error in GCC 4.7.1
pass 1 (section 5.5.1)
as far as I can tell I'm following the book to the letter and the configure
I have copied and pasted.
I tried the section three times already and every time I get the same
error, is it OK or shou
I just joined this list and can't respond properly.
I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg.
I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked.
Walter Webb
**
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See th
On 2012-09-03 07:53, Israel Silberg wrote:
>
> checking for MPFR... no
> configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI
> (including static vs shared).
> make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build
> make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble]
On Sep 3, 2012, at 01:53 AM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> checking for MPFR... no
> configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI
> (including static vs shared).
Most likely trying to use the host's installed mpfr.
First extract the gcc tarball from the sources directory and then
c
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder
and the configure and make are from gcc-build
Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1
lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah
total 11M
drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 .
dr
On Sep 3, 2012, at 06:33 AM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for your reply.
> I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder
> and the configure and make are from gcc-build
> Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1
>
> drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp
> dr
>
> I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder
> and the configure and make are from gcc-build
> Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1
>
> lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah
> total 11M
> drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 .
> drwxrwxrwt
On 9/3/2012 11:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
>>
>> I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC
>> except on the final build where they are built separately.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>
>
As I understand it, with the first two times the toolchain is being
built, and GMP, MPC,
Eleanore Boyd wrote:
> On 9/3/2012 11:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC
>>> except on the final build where they are built separately.
> As I understand it, with the first two times the toolchain is being
> built, and
Thaks all for the replies,
Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How
do I make the script write me the data I need?
I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-)
And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system
without gcc in it, shold
On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> Thaks all for the replies,
> Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How
> do I make the script write me the data I need?
> I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-)
> And another question, if I want in the end
Eleanore Boyd wrote:
> On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
>> Thaks all for the replies,
>> Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How
>> do I make the script write me the data I need?
>> I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-)
>> And another qu
And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a software
works because you wrote it good or because it has the compiler's enviroment.
Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will have a
comfertable way to update it?
On Sep 3, 2012 9:21 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote:
On 09/03/2012 01:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
Thaks all for the replies,
Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going
on? How do I make the script write me the data I need?
I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-)
And another question, if I want in the end to
On 09/03/2012 03:51 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
>
> And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a
> software works because you wrote it good or because it has the
> compiler's enviroment.
> Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will
> have a comfertable wa
Walter Webb wrote:
> I just joined this list and can't respond properly.
> I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg.
> I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked.
Good point. Using -j > 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can
cause race conditions that sometimes cause a fail
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Melville
wrote:
>> I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder
>
> I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC
> except on the final build where they are built separately.
>
> Richard
>
During pass 1,
>
> Walter Webb wrote:
> > I just joined this list and can't respond properly.
> > I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg.
> > I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked.
>
I'm glad you got it to build, but that's the conclusion of a simple
empiricist. It's like me saying that bec
Another day, another try.
I extracted the gcc again and did it again, and this time it worked.
Thanks all for your support.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Richard Melville <
richard.melvill...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Walter Webb wrote:
>> > I just joined this list and can't respond properly.
>
On 09/03/2012 11:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Walter Webb wrote:
>> I just joined this list and can't respond properly.
>> I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg.
>> I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked.
> Good point. Using -j > 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Melville
> wrote:
> >> I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder
>
>
> >
> > I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside
> GCC
> > except on the final build where they are built separately.
> >
> > Ric
On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). Picking up on
> what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to
> building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j > 1, Im wondering if there may
> be a race condition affecting the GCC bu
On 09/05/2012 08:17 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
> On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). Picking up on
>> what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to
>> building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j > 1, Im wondering if the
On 2012-09-05 13:34, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 08:17 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
>> I've been bashing away at building LFS for a VERY long time, and
>> done
>> many many builds of 7.2, this problem has not hit me once, I would
>> suggest you stop building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j > 1, as
On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
> On 2012-09-05 13:34, Baho Utot wrote:
[putolin]
>> I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
>>
>> Maybe those that do have a problem are all using a scripted build vs
>> those that don't have a scripted build?
>>
>> Suggest
On 2012-09-05 15:34, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
>
> Leaping before looking is what I do well and it has taught me a great
> deal. Following a path by others may be a very good guide, but to
> truly
> learn requires ones to deviate from the beaten path and str
>
> On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). ?Picking up on
> > what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to
> > building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j > 1, Im wondering if there may
> > be a race condition affect
>
> On 2012-09-05 13:34, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 08:17 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
> >> I've been bashing away at building LFS for a VERY long time, and
> >> done
> >> many many builds of 7.2, this problem has not hit me once, I would
> >> suggest you stop building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set t
On 2012-09-05 16:37, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> Who are you referring to here? You make an awful lot of assumptions.
>
> Richard
And yet you tell me that I should try reading all the posts.
--
Jasmine Iwanek
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
>
> On 2012-09-05 15:34, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
> >
> > Leaping before looking is what I do well and it has taught me a great
> > deal. Following a path by others may be a very good guide, but to
> > truly
> > learn requires ones to deviate from the beat
On 2012-09-05 16:46, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> What is that supposed to mean? Really, if you have nothing useful to
> say then dont say anything.
>
> Thanks for your positive post Baho.
>
> Richard
This is lfs-support, not
Whine-like-a-child-because-someone-gave-their-insight-and-opinion-and-
On 9/5/2012 11:20 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
> On 2012-09-05 16:46, Richard Melville wrote:
>> What is that supposed to mean? Really, if you have nothing useful to
>> say then dont say anything.
>>
>> Thanks for your positive post Baho.
>>
>> Richard
> This is lfs-support, not
> Whine-like-a-child-
Baho Utot wrote:
> I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the
> book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who
> knows by some not following the book new things are learned?
I don't have problem with users not following the book. It's just tha
On 2012-09-05 19:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow
>> the
>> book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved.
>> Who
>> knows by some not following the book new things are learned?
>
> I don't have
On 09/05/2012 02:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the
>> book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who
>> knows by some not following the book new things are learned?
> I don't have problem
On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it
> correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual
> way is a great problem.
Have you ever thought that the manual way does not have to involve
typing? I don't use scri
Baho Utot wrote:
> #!/bin/bash
> set -o errexit# exit if error
> set -o nounset# exit if variable not initalized
> set +h# disable hashall
> shopt -s -o pipefail
> pkgname=
> pkgver=
> srcname="${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz"
> srcdir=${pkgname}-${pkgver}
> startdir=$(pwd)
>
> functio
On 09/05/2012 03:47 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
> On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it
>> correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual
>> way is a great problem.
> Have you ever thought that the manual way
On 9/5/2012 2:54 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 03:47 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
>> On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>>> One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it
>>> correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual
>>> way is a great problem.
On 09/05/2012 03:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> #!/bin/bash
>> set -o errexit# exit if error
>> set -o nounset# exit if variable not initalized
>> set +h# disable hashall
>> shopt -s -o pipefail
>> pkgname=
>> pkgver=
>> srcname="${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz"
>> sr
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script
> then run it instead of the tty?
> What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it
> doesn't work. If I cut and paste to a term then I have l
>Have you ever thought that the manual way does not have to involve typing? I
>don't use scripts to build LFS (always manual for me :) ), but I do know how
>to copy+paste the commands into the console and hit Enter.
>Elly
Yes and us Windows people can allways download putty.exe and instal Open
On 09/05/2012 04:15 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script
>> then run it instead of the tty?
>> What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it
>> doesn't work.
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>>
>> Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script
>> then run it instead of the tty?
>> What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it
>> doesn't work. If I cut and paste t
On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> checking for MPFR... no
> configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
> static vs shared).
> make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
> make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble
Baho Utot schrieb:
>
> I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
>
so you just had very very much luck on your way...
there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds.
whenever i run into a problem, i just restart the package with -j1 which
often solved the prob
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:12:42AM +0200, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>
> recently i had intermittent failures on both xulrunner and firefox where
> i build with -jX since a very long time. with version 15.0 the build
> fails at about half of the builds on my system. giving -j1 runs fine. i
> can use 8 c
On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> > checking for MPFR... no
> > configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
> > static vs shared).
> > make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
> > make[1]: *** [s
On 09/07/2012 01:12 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Baho Utot schrieb:
>> I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
>>
> so you just had very very much luck on your way...
>
> there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds.
yes i know that, but I do not attribute my su
Tim Burress variosecure.net> writes:
> On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> > checking for MPFR... no
> > configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
> > static vs shared).
> > make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/l
50 matches
Mail list logo
