[Libreoffice] Why BLK selection mode? (was: Re: LO status bar annoyances)

2010-12-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
But wouldn't a better name than block selection then be rectangular selection? --tml P.S. I want a circular selection mode! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Accelerate perl installer: optimize installer::scriptitems::optimize_list().

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 23:02 -0600, Jordan Ayers wrote: Another performance improvement for the perl installer. This one brought my ./bin/ooinstall -l dirname time down from about 4 1/2 minutes to under 4 minutes. Oky doky, pushed. My perl foo is low, but the installer did seem to work as

[Libreoffice] Tools-Options [UI] bugs need love.

2010-12-02 Thread Yifan Jiang
Dear people, The 2 bugs reveals some visual flaw in Tools-Options dialog. They look annoying for our brand new release, not sure who's interested taking them? From my reproducing, this is a general platform problem: Bug 31944 - VBA Properties not fully displayed

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, cppunit, libcppunit undefined reference to dlopen

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joost, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: I missed the e-mail about moving from rawbuild to native build, so I did remove the old installation. :-) Then I did a new Native Build installation as described on the wiki page. Great. make[2]: Entering

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 18:08 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: hence the section Attention *** Ah - TLDR; etc. sorry. If you have an existing setup, _when_ the changes are pushed to master and you pull them for the first time, you _HAVE_ to re-do your autogen.sh and

[Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying that I had --with-java. On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with can't find ant Sorry - I should have backed up my old devel directory so I could go back and find out ... Cheers, Wol

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Is this when you run the autogen.sh? if it is, i had an issue with it bombing on junit. can you try and change in the autogen.sh from /bin/sh at the top to /bin/bash. that fixed my issue. if thats the case, not sure where else to turn to isolate this bug.. On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Wols Lists

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Fedora-specific hyperlink bug?

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 17:58 -0500, Joe Smith wrote: Is there something else I can do here to follow up? A report on fdo? I took care of this for LibreOffice. reading the PDF spec it says that URIs must be 7bit ASCII, so tweaked to always export anything outside the ASCII range as URI encoded %XX

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:15 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: The old system had --disable-epm in the standard flags. We don't need it because we run make_installer.pl on our own anyway. OK, so would it be possible to disable epm by default? Given that it was disabled by default when we had the

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 11:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Is this when you run the autogen.sh? if it is, i had an issue with it bombing on junit. can you try and change in the autogen.sh from /bin/sh at the top to /bin/bash. that fixed my issue. if thats the case, not sure where else to turn to isolate this

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
also might want to pull the latest as it seems from talking to kendy on irc that he pushed some things to fix it. might want to keep it as is and pull latest and try with that. On 12/02/2010 12:37 PM, Wols Lists wrote: On 02/12/10 11:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Is this when you run the

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-02 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:31:53AM +, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the polarity of the default arguments to match that. Great.

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 11:41, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: also might want to pull the latest as it seems from talking to kendy on irc that he pushed some things to fix it. might want to keep it as is and pull latest and try with that. No luck. Just done a fresh git clone - whether sh or bash makes no

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 11:45, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:31:53AM +, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the polarity of the

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-02 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Christoph, On 2010-12-02 at 01:37 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: Kendy, is there anything special within the original HC graphics for the StartCenter? Nothing that special, you can see what OOo used previously eg. here:

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:10:38AM +, Wols Lists wrote: On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying that I had --with-java. On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with can't find ant ant was always needed when you enable Java. (just that the old

Re: [Libreoffice] new download - checking for rpm

2010-12-02 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:57:01AM +, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: --with-java-target-version=1.5 has to be used manually. Not so sure ... see my email about ant. Just done a completely fresh clone, and the rpm problem has gone but it's still bombing because it can't

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Accelerate perl installer: optimize installer::scriptitems::optimize_list().

2010-12-02 Thread Alex Hudson
(apologies for breaking the thread; I only just subscribed) I offered an opinion on this excellent little patch to Caolán on IRC, basically that I thought the last foreach()/chop combo would be better written as a join. A minor nit, but probably not with much speed benefit. The more perlish

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix download target in make in new bootstrap build method.

2010-12-02 Thread Giuseppe Castagno
Hi all, not sure if the fix it's as originally intended. Or may be it's completely wrong, 'cause my knowledge of make is rather poor. beppec56. -- Kind Regards, Giuseppe Castagno Acca Esse http://www.acca-esse.eu giuseppe.castagno at acca-esse.eu beppec56 at openoffice.org From

[Libreoffice] bootstrap / configure defaults ...

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
So, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:31 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the polarity of the default arguments to match that. I worked through the above

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix download target in make in new bootstrap build method.

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:57 +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote: Hi all, not sure if the fix it's as originally intended. This is fixed now. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] FOSDEM foo ...

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Suren, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 15:35 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: Also is this the right time to apply for the FOSDEM paper or should I wait some more time for the patch to mature ? Wow - it's always the right time to apply for a FOSDEM paper :-) just whack your name in the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Accelerate perl installer: optimize installer::scriptitems::optimize_list().

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Alex, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:32 +, Alex Hudson wrote: (apologies for breaking the thread; I only just subscribed) Great to see you here :-) The more perlish version of optimize_list() would probably look more like this: Soo ... In general, doing a lot of text

Re: [Libreoffice] bootstrap / configure defaults ...

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 12:12, Michael Meeks wrote: --with-ant-home=$BUILDDIR/$APACHE_ANT + and have to have a system ant now [ should that be the default ? ] Mmmm... dunno. There's probably a lot of people like me - not Java developers - who neither need nor want java

Re: [Libreoffice] bootstrap / configure defaults ...

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote: --disable-epm Side effect here is that a build in smoketest won't do anything anymore, as it depends on a big tarball archived install made when --enable-epm So how about I just change the target in there to use ooinstall to create the

[Libreoffice] Fix for fdo#31190 to review for 3.3

2010-12-02 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi all, I've fixed fdo#31190, and it looks like something that could be integrated in 3.3 but before pushing to the branch, I'ld like to have some peer review. The patch is attached to the issue. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31190 Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker

Re: [Libreoffice] Why BLK selection mode? (was: Re: LO status bar annoyances)

2010-12-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com wrote: [...] BLK selects (roughly) rectangular blocks (is this useful for anything?) Concerning the usefulness ... as far as I remember (I had a talk with Frank Loehmann, the UX guy, who worked on that feature a

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Wols, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:54 +, Wols Lists wrote: configure: error: Ant not found - Make sure it's in the path or use --with-ant-home anth...@ashdown ~/gitstuff/lotest $ This is down to the change in default configure flags; I suspect you need something like the original:

[Libreoffice] default ix86 -mtune

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
Is currently -mtune=pentuimpro, FWIW in fedora land we default -mtune=atom for all our ix86 packages. Might be a good idea to do the same for the vanilla LibreOffice flags ? C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|31716 | -- Configure

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 14:09, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Wols, *, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying that I had --with-java. On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with can't

Re: [Libreoffice] bootstrap / configure defaults ...

2010-12-02 Thread Andras Timar
2010/12/2 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com:        --with-system-dicts        --with-external-dict-dir=/usr/share/hunspell        --with-external-hyph-dir=/usr/share/hyphen        --with-external-thes-dir=/usr/share/mythes        --with-dict=ALL        --without-myspell-dicts          

[Libreoffice] patch review for commit 67be5829944758dec070710521cd86ae49e00aa9

2010-12-02 Thread Radek Doulík
Hi Thorsten, would you please review my patch in vcl/source/canvastools? I would like to push it to 3-3 branch. Cheers Radek commit 67be5829944758dec070710521cd86ae49e00aa9 Author: Radek Doulik r...@novell.com Date: Thu Dec 2 15:23:17 2010 +0100 fix invalid read in doubleSequenceToColor,

Re: [Libreoffice] bootstrap / configure defaults ...

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:44 +, Wols Lists wrote: There's probably a lot of people like me - not Java developers - who neither need nor want java as part of their normal life Quite - I'll add an easy hack to remove Java from the build :-) for some value of 'Easy' ... [ at least, I

Re: [Libreoffice] bootstrap / configure defaults ...

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 15:04, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:44 +, Wols Lists wrote: There's probably a lot of people like me - not Java developers - who neither need nor want java as part of their normal life Quite - I'll add an easy hack to remove Java from the build :-) for

Re: [Libreoffice] Export OLE objects as PDF / graphics

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Gert, On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 22:34 +0100, Gert Faller wrote: and here is the same for calc (with Hidden=sal_True of course), I've just finished the build and the review. Sorry pardon; after some big and painful thrash trying to get RC1 into good shape, I finally took a look at this.

[Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
So, As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering: would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? [ this is primarily

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
would that also fix the issue of LO not finding junit jar and needing to use --without-junit when running ./autogen.sh? On 12/2/10 5:33 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: So, As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jonathon, Michael, *, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote: would that also fix the issue of LO not finding junit jar and needing to use --without-junit when running ./autogen.sh? That is totally different thing. If without-junit is a problem, then

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote: So, As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering: would anyone scream if we

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:45:17PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: (without the bogus version dependencies), quicker to compile, and faster to run (I hope) ;-) Faste to run? Surely not. Java is only loaded when java-stuff is actually used. Actually observations show it does make a

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
i'm not worried bout not having junit wasn't sure if junit would have been affected by --without-java. reason i was having as of last night was small issue with autogen.sh which kendy kindly fixed On 12/2/10 5:57 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:34:59PM +0100, Jonathan

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:        would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? I would. I would not. [ this is primarily for developers ], should make it easier to build Come on, what is hard about installing a JDK? My LibO build

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Accelerate perl installer: optimize installer::scriptitems::optimize_list().

2010-12-02 Thread Jordan Ayers
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 23:02 -0600, Jordan Ayers wrote: Another performance improvement for the perl installer.  This one brought my ./bin/ooinstall -l dirname time down from about 4 1/2 minutes to under 4 minutes. Oky

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Sebastian, *; On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:        would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? I would. I would not. I hope not for the wrong reasons. [

Re: [Libreoffice] default ix86 -mtune

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Caolan, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:52 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Is currently -mtune=pentuimpro, FWIW in fedora land we default -mtune=atom for all our ix86 packages. Might be a good idea to do the same for the vanilla LibreOffice flags ? Having consulted Michael Matz, head of our

[Libreoffice] Make BrOffice branding optional (fdo#31770)

2010-12-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Michael, could you please review the attached diff before I commit it to the libreoffice-3-3 branch? I adds your suggested change for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31770 to make the BrOffice branding optional. It works like a charm here. Best Regards, Petr ---

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Clean code at impress

2010-12-02 Thread Kayo Hamid
Covering impress/animations/source/animcore/ and impress/sd/source/core/*, sending for review. Thanks, revol_. cleancode-impress.two.dirs.diff Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Make BrOffice branding optional (fdo#31770)

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 21:17 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: could you please review the attached diff before I commit it to the libreoffice-3-3 branch? I adds your suggested change for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31770 to make the BrOffice branding optional. Looks like the

Re: [Libreoffice] default ix86 -mtune

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 20:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Having consulted Michael Matz, head of our compiler team, and general genius; he quoth thusly: As long as this is restricted to the 32bit version this makes somewhat sense. Yes, should have said as much, only 32bit

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 20:31 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Sebastian, *; On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: My LibO build failed with the included openjdk, gcj, and sun-jre installed, I had to remove openjdk, and then I had to remove the gcj

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

2010-12-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Lubos, you wrote: I'm not asking for anything ridiculous like having a paragraph explaining every line, I'm saying that everything non-trivial should have at least some documentation Good, then we're mostly on the same page. Then we're both talking about mission statements, higher-level

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Accelerate perl installer: optimize installer::scriptitems::optimize_list().

2010-12-02 Thread Alex Hudson
Hey Jordan, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:29 -0600, Jordan Ayers wrote: I'm not a perl expert, just have had to learn it on the job over the last few years. Since I'm also not very familiar with all the details the installer is handling, I've been focusing on incremental cleanup items.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch review for commit 67be5829944758dec070710521cd86ae49e00aa9

2010-12-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Radek Doulík wrote: would you please review my patch in vcl/source/canvastools? I would like to push it to 3-3 branch. Done, thanks for that fix - nasty temporary of a temporary bug. Signed-off pushed. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpq0Y33Rt6xE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch review for commit 67be5829944758dec070710521cd86ae49e00aa9

2010-12-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Radek Doulík wrote: would you please review my patch in vcl/source/canvastools? I would like to push it to 3-3 branch. Done, thanks for that fix - nasty temporary of a temporary bug. Signed-off pushed. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpV2bJa5WSSs.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Clean code at impress

2010-12-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Kayo Hamid wrote: Covering impress/animations/source/animcore/ and impress/sd/source/core/*, sending for review. Hi Kayo, many thanks, looks good, committed - two minor tweaks: turned the first XCommend... hunk into a better comment, and did not remove the inbetween parts of

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-02 Thread Andrew C. E. Dent
I have made simple HC variants for the start center images here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/Backing_HC.zip Hope that helps,Andrew ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/12/10 19:31, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Sebastian, *; On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? I would. I would

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:32:15PM +, Wols Lists wrote: I would agree with this. This is my problem with ant - I have java but not ant installed, it worked for me on the old system, and it now fails. Then install it? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux

Re: [Libreoffice] Review fix for fdo#32039 for inclusion in 3.3

2010-12-02 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:54:50PM +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr wrote: Caolan, Michael, Miklos, Could you please have a look at the patch attached to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ? I'ld like to push that fix for 3.3 as the bug is a regression

[Libreoffice] Scrolling while cursor on a note

2010-12-02 Thread Andy Hearn
There's a feature which I don't think should be present (this here applies to both formats, odt and doc): For a multiple-page document, with at least some lengthy notes: - Place the cursor within a note in the sidebar, and then try to scroll down the document using the vertical scroll bar either

[Libreoffice] more SAL_N_ELEMENTS

2010-12-02 Thread Kenneth Venken
hey, more use of the SAL_N_ELEMENTS macro like replacing the STATIC_TABLE_SIZE macro. -- Kenneth From 62a94ea8d83b129ef479304865d3f2085b191c32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Venken kenneth.ven...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:41:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] more Sal n elements ---

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote: So,       As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented features into

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:33am -0500 Thu, 02 Dec 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering: would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:31:02 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:        would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? I would. I would not. I hope not