Re: [Libreoffice-qa] we broke the 600 UNCONFIRMED bugs milestone again

2014-12-16 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:33:57 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:51:20 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: see this table: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap the UNCONFIRMED

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] we broke the 600 UNCONFIRMED bugs milestone again

2014-12-14 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:51:20 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: see this table: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap the UNCONFIRMED bug count is 599 let's keep pushing to reach 500 before Christmas

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

2014-12-12 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:07:33 +0100, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=75025hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.2 MAB + 5/208 38/232 63/255 74/261 83/266 81/263 84/262 82/260 80/260 82/260 86/257 ... please anybody help to

[Libreoffice-qa] we broke the 600 UNCONFIRMED bugs milestone again

2014-12-09 Thread Tommy
see this table: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap the UNCONFIRMED bug count is 599 let's keep pushing to reach 500 before Christmas. :-) -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client:

[Libreoffice-qa] mab4.2 to mab4.3 migration almost over

2014-12-08 Thread Tommy
hi guys, I've retested and migrated most of the mab4.2 to the mab4.3 list. m -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mab4.2 to mab4.3 migration almost over

2014-12-08 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:45:59 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi guys, I've retested and migrated most of the mab4.2 to the mab4.3 list. of the original 83 mab4.2 issue that were still open on the 4.2.x END OF LIFE (november 19th) a few were marked as RESOLVED WORKSFORME see list here

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mab4.2 to mab4.3 migration almost over

2014-12-08 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:45:59 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi guys, I've retested and migrated most of the mab4.2 to the mab4.3 list. of the original 83 mab4.2 issue that were still open on the 4.2.x END OF LIFE (november 19th) a few were marked as RESOLVED WORKSFORME see list here

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Meeting Minutes - 2014-12-03

2014-12-08 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:38:58 +0100, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On Saturday, 2014-12-06 21:18:05 -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: * If a bug is fixed on the Master branch (or in Fresh), but is still present on Fresh/Still, it can be helpful to tag the bug and bibisect it, in addition

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mab4.2 to mab4.3 migration almost over

2014-12-08 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:52:59 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: here's the list of the last mab4.2 survivors: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=65675hide_resolved=1 good to see that we were able to reduce the number to just 5: 54398: FILESAVE: DOC files

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Meeting Minutes - 2014-12-03

2014-12-08 Thread Tommy
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:29:23 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: How do we decide which bugs to tag? I suggest that for now we only tag backportRequests if the bug was reported against an active Still or Fresh branch. So to put that into context with our current

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions

2014-12-07 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 23:11:22 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:43:37 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: 6 months passed by the END of LIFE of the 4.1.x which was set on May 28, 2014 so it's time to clean the bugzilla version dropdown and remove all 4he 4.1.x RCs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions

2014-12-05 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:43:37 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: as all of you should know, 4.1.x reached end of life few months ago I thinks it's time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions from bugzilla version dropdown menu and leave just the final releases like it has already been done

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.8 RC2 test builds available

2014-12-04 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 02:35:42 +0100, Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi *, for the upcoming new version 4.2.8, the builds for rc2 are now available on pre-releases. 4.2.8 is an additional release to finish off the LibreOffice 4.2 codeline. . The list of fixed bugs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-4-2-8 and Tag libreoffice-4.2.8.1 created

2014-12-01 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 09:27:49 +0100, Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, The tag libreoffice-4.2.8.1 (AKA 4.2.8 RC1) and the corresponding branch libreoffice-4-2-8 have been created. The branch will be used for fine tuning of the 4.2.8 release. (there is one additional

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-11-28 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:27:19 +0100, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote: . + look at sorting spreadsheet / use-cases etc. (Eike) cf. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=108990 ] ongoing, a mix of real bugs, wrong expectations and misconception

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] any news about the ping retest for old NEW bugs

2014-11-28 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:49:16 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Hey Tommy, ... I'm just curious to know if that test is going to be performed soon. Sorry I'm incredibly busy - it'll likely be in 2 weeks or so. Before running it I really want to look at the list and make sure

[Libreoffice-qa] any news about the ping retest for old NEW bugs

2014-11-27 Thread Tommy
this has been discussed in the last weeks in the QA list and in last QA call I'm just curious to know if that test is going to be performed soon. -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa

[Libreoffice-qa] 4.4 beta and 4.5 alpha versions in bugzilla

2014-11-22 Thread Tommy
in bugzilla we still miss the 4.4 beta 1 and 4.5 alpha 0 versions please add them -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice-qa] 4.0.0.0 beta1 version in bugzilla missing

2014-11-21 Thread Tommy
so please add it to the dropdown menu bye, Tommy -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Windows master daily builds stuck to nov 12

2014-11-20 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 08:17:10 +0100, Andras Timar ti...@fsf.hu wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi, is there any reason why I can't find a 4.4.x daily build after 12th november? http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ all the tinderbox are stuck

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.x EOL and mab4.2

2014-11-19 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:21:13 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi there, according to the release plan the 4.2.x EOL will be november 19th https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#4.2_release after that day I'll start migrating all the still existing mab4.2 bugs to the mab4.3 list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: LO 4.3.3.2 is missing from versions list menu

2014-11-18 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:17:03 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 04:43:39 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:27:35 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Fixed thanks. one last fix needed. 4.3.3.2 is still credited as rc instead

[Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.x EOL and mab4.2

2014-11-17 Thread Tommy
hi there, according to the release plan the 4.2.x EOL will be november 19th https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#4.2_release after that day I'll start migrating all the still existing mab4.2 bugs to the mab4.3 list however it's not clear to me if an extra 4.2.8 release is under

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.x EOL and mab4.2

2014-11-17 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:12:25 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: On 11/17/2014 04:21 AM, Tommy wrote: . however it's not clear to me if an extra 4.2.8 release is under consideration because of the infamous sorting calc bug 4.2.8 will *not* be released. So 4.2.7

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Windows master daily builds stuck to nov 12

2014-11-16 Thread Tommy
already someone working on this issue. Tommy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org

[Libreoffice-qa] Windows master daily builds stuck to nov 12

2014-11-15 Thread Tommy
hi, is there any reason why I can't find a 4.4.x daily build after 12th november? http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ all the tinderbox are stuck to that date -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: LO 4.3.3.2 is missing from versions list menu

2014-11-14 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 04:43:39 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:27:35 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Fixed thanks. one last fix needed. 4.3.3.2 is still credited as rc instead of release bye, Tommaso and the same regarding 4.3.4.1 rc which has

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-14 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 07:13:29 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: sure, QA consensus is necessary, however please wait the official release of 4.3.4 which is planned in Week 47 , Nov 17, 2014 - Nov 23, 2014 so we are sure the user will retest the bugs with the latest up to date version

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

2014-11-13 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:13:33 +0100, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote: + look at sorting spreadsheet / use-cases etc. (Eike) cf. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85490 ] [ some progress, Luke did some good work on JBF's doc. several

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-13 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:13:49 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: ... sure, QA consensus is necessary, however please wait the official release of 4.3.4 which is planned in Week 47 , Nov 17, 2014 - Nov 23, 2014 so we are sure the user will retest the bugs with the latest up to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-12 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:54:02 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Tommy wrote: my proposal is to ping: UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 100 days http://snipurl.com/29ejxgd (183 bugs) I am not a fan at all for pinging unconfirmed bugs . . . already too

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: LO 4.3.3.2 is missing from versions list menu

2014-11-12 Thread Tommy
see subject ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: LO 4.3.3.2 is missing from versions list menu

2014-11-12 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:27:35 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Fixed thanks. one last fix needed. 4.3.3.2 is still credited as rc instead of release bye, Tommaso ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-12 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:24:30 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Ok. let's go ahead with the old NEW bugs (nice oxymoron). I suggest waiting a few days after the incoming release of LibO 4.3.4 before running this ping. I want to wait for QA call to discuss and give the +1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-11 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:46:03 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: moreover we have to decide if pinging just UNCONFIRMED old bugs or even NEW bugs (excluding the easy hacks). if the ping campaign is accepted by the QA, we only have to decide the timeframe of bugs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-04 Thread Tommy
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:24:44 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: For now I'm not doing this just because there are so many other things to do and as of now I'm not seeing a clear message as to what we're doingI've seen at least 3-4 proposals with different links and the like.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-03 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 06:49:35 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: once 4.2.7 and 4.3.3 are now available, I think we could run the please retest automated message to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months. actually there's 94 out of them. see list: http://snipurl.com/29eckcc let's see what's

[Libreoffice-qa] www.viewdocsonline.com for MS files bug triaging

2014-11-01 Thread Tommy
, Tommy -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa

[Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months

2014-11-01 Thread Tommy
once 4.2.7 and 4.3.3 are now available, I think we could run the please retest automated message to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months. actually there's 94 out of them. see list: http://snipurl.com/29eckcc let's see what's the feedback ratio and then decide if doing the same on older NEW

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks

2014-10-28 Thread Tommy
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:23:31 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any retest pings there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the

Re: new git bugzilla script

2014-10-27 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:00:56 +0100, Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote: Hey, so I finally implemented a new git bugzilla script that should bring back the commit notifications in bugzilla for fixed bugs. As it is a complete new implementation you should report any problems

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] UNCONFIRMED bug count at 700

2014-10-27 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:06:24 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: I'm slightly concerned that many of these are going into NEEDINFO with just a please test against latest release. yes we should avoid that. I don't have the time to adequately check into this right now but if

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] UNCONFIRMED bug count at 700

2014-10-26 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:59:16 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: WOW!!! close to break another milestone... in this very moment the count is 700!!! who's gonna kick the next one? STATS: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-25 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:30:01 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: but we are constantly doing this with NEEDINFO bugs... once in a while I get a bunch of email from NEEDINFO bugs I'm on CC. it doesn't disturbs me at all. Developers have complained about it - and have asked

[Libreoffice-qa] UNCONFIRMED bug count at 700

2014-10-25 Thread Tommy
WOW!!! close to break another milestone... in this very moment the count is 700!!! who's gonna kick the next one? STATS: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap CHART:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks

2014-10-24 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:35:30 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: On 10/24/2014 02:59 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi, I've seen a Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it is

[Libreoffice-qa] mass retest ping to UNCONFIRMED and NEW bugs untouched by more than 6 months (or 1 year)

2014-10-24 Thread Tommy
Hi QA guys, I ahde this idea and I want to hear what you think about. we currently have 825 UNCONFIRMED and 7783 NEW bugs. I think that there should a consistent number of those who did not receive any new comment in the last 6 months. i.e. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61972

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-24 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:18:44 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Tommy wrote: your bug report has shown no activity in the last 6 months. newer LibO releases with hundred of bugifixes and new features have been

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-24 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:47:05 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: I'm honestly hesitant to do any more of this kind of thing with the email notification on. Devs hate it, users hate it, etc . . . Our bug tracker is making progress, IMHO this can wait until we get it fully up. Just

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-23 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:28:20 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: ... Running the oldest set of 81 bugs would be an interesting test, just to see what percentage of bug reporters return to add a comment to the bug. ... I'm pretty sure that there's tons of old NEW bugs that have

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-23 Thread Tommy
(not so good :-b) that's 4% which is not not so good but not that bad after all Best, Joel cheers, Tommy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-22 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:47 +0200, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: For 900 (2y 6m) -- 81 bugs https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWf1=days_elapsedlimit=0list_id=481870o1=greaterthanorder=bug_id

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: Our next QA Meeting is on Wednesday!

2014-10-20 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:31:58 +0200, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: 3) Hear about our stats (spoiler: UNCONCONFIRMED bug count is down to 776) let's try to drop the 750 milestone till wednesday !!! :-) ___ List Name:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-19 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:47 +0200, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: so a ping retest mail campaign could be at the moment tested just with the older subsets (730d or 900d) to not generate an excessive spam

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-18 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 05:22:56 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Okay - if you want I'll run this with my normal needinfo cleanup on the first of the month. How's that sound? Best, Joel sounds nice. I suggest to wait a few days more for the release of LibO 4.3.3 (Week 44 ,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-18 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:56:03 +0200, Florian Reisinger flo...@libreoffice.org wrote: Hi, For 180d (1/2y) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDf1=days_elapsedlist_id=481820o1=greaterthanproduct=LibreOfficequery_format=advancedv1=180 [162 bugs] And for 365d (1y)

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:30:52 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Sounds great - so let's try to come up with a concrete plan that everyone (or most) sign off on and then just do a thumbs up or down vote. Let's try to not get too picky about the details. @Tommy - you mind giving

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-16 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:00:16 +0200, bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Tommy wrote we currently have 799 UNCONFIRMED and 7793 NEW bugs. I think that there should be a consistent number of those who did not receive any new comment in the last 6 months. [...] meanwhile, so please retest

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-16 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:26:48 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Best, Joel P.S. Again I think all of this should wait until we have our own bug tracker so we can suppress emails and not piss off everyone cc'ed on every bug . . . maybe we can give email notification just

[Libreoffice-qa] UNCONFIRMED bug count below 800

2014-10-15 Thread Tommy
the QA team broke another mileston. we are back below 800, see: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap the trend is good as well:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] UNCONFIRMED bug count below 800

2014-10-15 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:53:47 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: the QA team broke another mileston. we are back below 800, see: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap the trend is good as well: https

[Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-15 Thread Tommy
Hi QA guys, I had this idea and I want to hear what you think about. we currently have 799 UNCONFIRMED and 7793 NEW bugs. I think that there should be a consistent number of those who did not receive any new comment in the last 6 months. i.e.

[Libreoffice-qa] pinging old bugs to retest

2014-10-15 Thread Tommy
Hi QA guys, I had this idea and I want to hear what you think about. we currently have 799 UNCONFIRMED and 7793 NEW bugs. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap I think that there should be a consistent

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Call Time

2014-08-29 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:53:45 +0200, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: I've joined 2 calls in the past but unfortunately it will not be possible to join again. I have 3 little kids at home (2, 5 and 7 years old

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Call Time

2014-08-28 Thread Tommy
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:45:39 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: I'd really like to suggest that people who are quite active on the ML and FDO at least consider joining the call -- it's free and you aren't expected to say anything if you have nothing to say ;) But it would

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

2014-08-22 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:18:42 +0200, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote: + 4.2.7 - due in week 40 - 29th Sept freeze. + Potential for new incremental releases sooner. what does this mean? will we see a 4.2.8 release too?

Re: Minutes of ESC call: 2014-07-31

2014-08-02 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:46:30 +0200, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: * Release Engineering update (Christian) + 4.2.6 status + will be released tomorrow (Friday) just to say that I did not see any release announcement yesterday and that we still have 4.2.5 in the download

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REPOENED Status

2014-08-02 Thread Tommy
the same mistake of Florian, becuase the WFM - REOPENED looked the correct way which it wasn't. next time I'll do the WFM - NEEDINFO - UNCONFIRMED thing which is not intuitive but is right. thanks, Tommy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REPOENED Status

2014-08-02 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:34:01 +0200, Florian Reisinger flo...@libreoffice.org wrote: Hi, The bigger problem is the following: User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A disagrees and puts the state to 1) REOPENED 2) NEEDINFO Sorry to say, but this error will

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability

2014-08-02 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 04:11:06 +0200, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, Just wanted to give everyone a heads up that i'm doing another round of extensive interoperability now that 4.3 has been released and am sending in a few bugs in per day, rather than alot at a single time.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REPOENED Status

2014-08-02 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:00:09 +0200, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Florian Reisinger wrote The bigger problem is the following: User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A disagrees and puts the state to 1) REOPENED 2) NEEDINFO Sorry to say, but this error

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.6 not yet available for download

2014-07-30 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:27:31 +0200, Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Tommy, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: I received the release announcement of 4.2.6 You saw an announcement for the rc2 - i.e. it is available on the prereleases page

[Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.6 not yet available for download

2014-07-29 Thread Tommy
I received the release announcement of 4.2.6 but I still don't see it available to download from LibO website where 4.2.5 is still shown. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Toolbar Proposal Completed

2014-07-27 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:22:18 +0200, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, I guess i should have been clearer with my initial email. :) The purpose of my toolbar proposal is to provide most users a good set of default toolbar buttons, as most users dont customize their toolbar.

[Libreoffice-qa] 700 unconfirmed bugs milestone broke

2014-07-27 Thread Tommy
just to say that the count is now 699 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap some nice chart: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets=UNCONFIRMEDdatasets=NEEDINFO great

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Toolbar Proposal Completed

2014-07-26 Thread Tommy
little impact on me. that's only my 2 cents. don't take it personally. bye, Tommy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa

[Libreoffice-qa] RC4 needed

2014-07-23 Thread Tommy
Hi, I think we cannot ship 4.3.0 out with this bug unfixed. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81511 are the developers aware of this? are we gonna delay the 4.3.0 release adding an exceptional RC4? -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-users] Bug Squashing Session in 90 Minutes

2014-07-22 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:06:01 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: ... wow!!! count is 788 right now!!! not bad for a last minute thing!!! thumbs up. watch this chart!!! awesome!!! https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets=UNCONFIRMEDdatasets=NEEDINFO

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-users] Bug Squashing Session in 90 Minutes

2014-07-21 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:20:23 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Hey Charles, On 07/21/2014 08:23 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Hello Joel, Next time please let us know in advance... It was a very last minute thing, got up this morning and saw a few people in the chat and said

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] let's break the 900 Unconfirmed Bug Count

2014-07-20 Thread Tommy
below 750 by the end of Monday. Best, Joel the count is now 832 and I'm really amazed by the results of the QA team. the 500 goal you talked about weeks ago seems not being impossible right now if we keep this rhythm. bye, Tommy ___ List Name

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3.0.3 bugzilla version item missing

2014-07-19 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:16:51 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi there, please add the 4.3.0.3 item to bugzilla version dropdown menu and BSA as well, which I suppose is missing too. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] let's break the 900 Unconfirmed Bug Count

2014-07-19 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 23:25:03 +0200, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:44:35 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: come on guys, we need just one more!!! :-) we did it!!! 898 right now

[Libreoffice-qa] 4.3.0.3 bugzilla version item missing

2014-07-18 Thread Tommy
hi there, please add the 4.3.0.3 item to bugzilla version dropdown menu ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa

[Libreoffice-qa] please test this bug under Win against 4.3.0.2

2014-07-16 Thread Tommy
here it is: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81333 I have no 4.3.0.2 available right now. it's not reproducible with 4.4 master. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change

[Libreoffice-qa] Weekly Bug Summary. what about monthly and yearly

2014-07-11 Thread Tommy
hi there I wonder if it's possible to have this bugzilla weekly stat page on a monthly or yearly basis https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html is there any place I can tweak the time period which is actually limited to last week? -- Using Opera's revolutionary

[Libreoffice-qa] time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions

2014-07-09 Thread Tommy
as all of you should know, 4.1.x reached end of life few months ago I thinks it's time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions from bugzilla version dropdown menu and leave just the final releases like it has already been done in previous dead branches -- Using Opera's revolutionary email

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions

2014-07-09 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:44:33 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: I believe we agreed to give it 6 months from EOL to give time for transition. I could be wrong though ;) Best, Joel ok, maybe you are right... I now remember that 6 months embargo too.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No New Builds

2014-06-28 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 05:20:52 +0200, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, Just noticed that 4.2 and 4.3 havent gotten new builds since the 23rd. it seems to me that the issue is limited to Linux TB 45 which has last build available from 23rd. other TB are up to date

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.2.5 RC2 available

2014-06-21 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:12:51 +0200, Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear Community, The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release candidate of LibreOffice 4.2.5. The upcoming 4.2.5 will be the fifth in a sequence of frequent bugfix releases for our

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.2.5 RC2 available

2014-06-21 Thread Tommy
4.2.x still is in the fresh category On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:56:46 +0200, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Tommy, I assume 4.2 cant become stable until 4.3 becomes fresh. :) Regards, Jay Philips that makes sense. ___ List Name

[Libreoffice-qa] Bug 79761 needs profiling

2014-06-19 Thread Tommy
Hi, I need some Linux user to confirm and then profile this nasty performance regression of the autocorrect engine in 4.4 master Bug 79761 - autocorrect slow-down got worse https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79761 I tried debugging and profiling with Windows tools but Micheal Meeks

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

2014-06-12 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:17:11 +0200, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote: ... * Open 4.3 MAB + 5/22 3/20 5/16 4/12 2/8 3/7 2/5 1/2 1/2 0/1 0/1 22% 15% + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=75025hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.2 MAB + 71/207 71/205 73/200

[Libreoffice-qa] 4.4.x master build with symbols for Windows. where?

2014-06-07 Thread Tommy
I'd like to try debugging and obtaining a trace. I was told that I need a build with symbols. where can I find one 4.4.x master build for Windows? I took a look at this link: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/symbols/ but it looks confusing to me what should I

LibreOffice 4.4 most annoying bugs

2014-06-04 Thread Tommy
hi I created a new meta-issue for mab4.4 here's the link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-qa] new mab4.4 page and last (die hard) mab4.1

2014-06-04 Thread Tommy
hi QA guys, I've created a new mab4.4 page at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641 moreover I ask confirmation of the last surviving mab4.1 at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59613 so we can finally close that meta-issue -- Using Opera's revolutionary email

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] new mab4.4 page and last (die hard) mab4.1

2014-06-04 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 07:16:44 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Tommy - I moved that one - leaving the pleasure of closing 4.1 mab to you :) Best, Joel P.S. Thanks for your incredible work closed. :-) ___ List Name: Libreoffice

Re: bug stats from deferred ESC call ...

2014-05-30 Thread Tommy
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:01:54 +0200, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote: ... * QA stats: + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html +227-144(+83 overall) many thanks to the top bug squashers: Jorendc 12

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mab4.1 migration to mab4.2

2014-05-27 Thread Tommy
On Fri, 23 May 2014 14:04:45 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Wed, 21 May 2014 19:33:49 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi guys, please take some time to help me finishing the mab4.1 to mab4.2 migration. here's the list: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Windows Printing Bug Needs Confirmed

2014-05-26 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 26 May 2014 06:44:37 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Can someone take a look at this one: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79194 Looks pretty nasty - if confirmed IMHO should be on mab4.3 list. Thanks! Joel I think it's a dup of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mab4.1 migration to mab4.2

2014-05-23 Thread Tommy
On Wed, 21 May 2014 19:33:49 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014 07:13:38 +0200, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: hi guys, please take some time to help me finishing the mab4.1 to mab4.2 migration. here's the list: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id

<    1   2   3   4   >