https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #52 from Mehmet gelisin ---
In LibO 4.4.2.2 on Mac OSX, the LibO spell checker / dictionaries are not used
at all (tested with Writer). Just Mac OSX's own spell checker / dictionary is
being used. This is a regression from LibO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #51 from Markus Wernig ---
Followed-up in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #50 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Re: Comment #46, I am not debugging the old attached document, but the code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #49 from Markus Wernig ---
(In reply to Tamas Domjan from comment #48)
> Hello Markus,
>
> Sorry, I totally forgot that I not provided feedback before. Now I
> downloaded the 4.5.0.0.alpha0 and run on Windwos 7 x86 with Acrobat Reade
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #48 from Tamas Domjan ---
Hello Markus,
Sorry, I totally forgot that I not provided feedback before. Now I downloaded
the 4.5.0.0.alpha0 and run on Windwos 7 x86 with Acrobat Reader 11.0.09. I also
used a recent version of digital ce
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #47 from Tamas Domjan ---
Created attachment 110377
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=110377&action=edit
Untitled 1.pdf for the comment @ 02/12/2014
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #46 from Markus Wernig ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #45)
> Yes, I have now noticed the long string of zeroes (that is supposed to get
> overwritten by the actual signature). Debugging it.
Tor. The document submitted by
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #45 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Yes, I have now noticed the long string of zeroes (that is supposed to get
overwritten by the actual signature). Debugging it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #44 from Markus Wernig ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #40)
> Well, it can be a matter of taste what is "correctly signed" and what is
> not. Presumably many "normal" users use the latest version of Adobe Reader,
> and it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #43 from Markus Wernig ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #41)
> (But sure, the certificate was not expired at the time of signing, so by
> default, if I understand correctly, Adobe Reader should not mind that it is
> expired
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #42 from Tamas Domjan ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #41)
> (But sure, the certificate was not expired at the time of signing, so by
> default, if I understand correctly, Adobe Reader should not mind that it is
> expired
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #41 from Tor Lillqvist ---
(But sure, the certificate was not expired at the time of signing, so by
default, if I understand correctly, Adobe Reader should not mind that it is
expired now.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #40 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Well, it can be a matter of taste what is "correctly signed" and what is not.
Presumably many "normal" users use the latest version of Adobe Reader, and it
claims the signature is invalid. (Even if nothing e
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #39 from Tamas Domjan ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #37)
> By the way, Adobe Reader XI (11.0.09) says that also the allegedly correct
> digital_signature_correct.pdf document attached in Comment #1 has problems:
>
> Sig
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #38 from Markus Wernig ---
Can you give the entire error message?
It looks like Acrobat can read the signature, but has a problem with it.
Make sure that the CA that has issued the signing certificate is imported in
Acrobat's trust s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #37 from Tor Lillqvist ---
By the way, Adobe Reader XI (11.0.09) says that also the allegedly correct
digital_signature_correct.pdf document attached in Comment #1 has problems:
Signature validity is unknown:
Document has not been
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #35 from Markus Wernig ---
Ok, created bug 83940 as tracker and split problem in two new bugs (bug 83937,
bug 83939).
Hope that's OK for everyone.
I would still like to know the results of Tamas' tests with the dev build, if
possibl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||83940
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #34 from Michael Meeks ---
Hi Markus,
This bug is getting extremely unwield. Can we close it, and create a series of
new individual bugs, and also a tracker bug that aggregates them all via the
"Depends on:" field (just add comma sep
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #33 from Markus Wernig ---
I had a look at Tamas' original document here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82188.
As in my case, there was no signature at all, but only a blob of zeroes where
the signature should be. I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #32 from Markus Wernig ---
BTW. when signing the document itself using File->Digital Signatures, all works
well with softtoken and all hardtokens. We can even apply a qualified signature
to the ODT (which is very cool, btw.)
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #31 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106287
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106287&action=edit
valgrind trace LO 4.4.0.0 not crashing qualified hardtoken signature NOK
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #30 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106286
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106286&action=edit
output LO 4.4.0.0 crashing qualified hardtoken
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #29 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106284
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106284&action=edit
valgrind trace LO 4.4.0.0 not crashing hardtoken
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assign
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #28 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106283
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106283&action=edit
PDF/A signature OK hardtoken
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #27 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106282
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106282&action=edit
PDF/A signature OK
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #26 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106281
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106281&action=edit
PDF signature OK
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #25 from Markus Wernig ---
Michael
I have now run a couple of tests, trying to create signed PDFs with three
different certificates:
- Soft certificate ("softtoken"). This was a plain PKCS#12 file imported into
the Mozilla NSS DB
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #24 from Markus Wernig ---
Hi Tamas
I think you should find what you need here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
Please report back any findings. Also what kind of certificate you are using
(softtoken or hardtoken)
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #23 from Tamas Domjan ---
Hi Michael & Markus,
Thank you very much for working on a solution for this issue.
Would you be able to provide a link to a (Win) compiled version of the patched
release? Then I would be able to test the sig
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #22 from Markus Wernig ---
Michael
I git cloned git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core today to commit
6ceff3f7deb1a6b66c0119c73b797a925f8fbee7 and built with gcc-4.8.3 and
./autogen.sh --enable-symbols --without-krb5 --with
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #21 from Michael Meeks ---
Markus - that should fix it; if you can build yourself, I'd just build master &
play - unfortunately, I don't have my digital signature foo setup - so I can't
even test it; but - reading the code & valgrind
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA |BSA target:4.4.0
--- Comment #20 f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus.mohrhard@googlemail.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #18 from Michael Meeks ---
Unfortunately this trace -seems- to be of a build without debuginfo. Did you
pass: --enable-symbols to autogen.sh ? that really helps get precise file /
line-number information for your build.
Thanks !
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #16 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106174
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106174&action=edit
valgrind trace LO 4.3.1.2 crashing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #15 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106173
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106173&action=edit
valgrind trace LO 4.3.1.2 not crashing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #14 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 106172
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106172&action=edit
valgrind trace LO 4.2.6. 2 not starting
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #13 from Markus Wernig ---
As proposed by Michael, I've run the command through valgrind. Here's a
summary:
1) LO 4.2.6.2, compiled with gcc-4.8.3, KDE-integration, debugging symbols in
LO and glibc:
Does not run at all, aborts even
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105971|gdb output 4.3.1.2 double |gdb output 4.3.1.2 double
descrip
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105968|gdb output corrupted|gdb output 4.2.6.2
description|do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105966|gdb output double free or
|gdb output 4.2.6.2 double
descrip
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105967|gdb output segfault |gdb output 4.2.6.2 segfault
descr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #12 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 105971
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105971&action=edit
gdb output 4.3.1.2 double free or corruption
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #11 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 105970
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105970&action=edit
test document
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #10 from Markus Wernig ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> 10) If the target pdf file name already exists, LO 4.2.6.2 asks if it should
> be overwritten and crashes after that question is answered. LO 4.3.1.2 does
> not ask, but crashes i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #9 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 105968
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105968&action=edit
gdb output corrupted double-linked list
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105965|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105966|gdb output |gdb output double free or
descrip
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105965|gdb output |gdb output segfault
description|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #7 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 105966
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105966&action=edit
gdb output
double free or corruption (fasttop)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Markus Wernig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gokcen.eras...@gmail.com,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #5 from Markus Wernig ---
Created attachment 105965
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105965&action=edit
gdb output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #4 from Tamas Domjan ---
Addition to my previous comment: no PDF file created at the time of the
LibreOffice 4.2.5.2 crash.
But I did an another test with LibreOffice version 4.3.0.2 (4.3 RC2), with
this version the original behavi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Tamas Domjan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
ign_christian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #1 from Tamas Domjan ---
Created attachment 82189
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82189&action=edit
Created by PDF Creator print driver from LibO
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
60 matches
Mail list logo
