https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@prosa.dk
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
kompilainenn <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.d
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #9 from Khaled Hosny ---
I’d close this WONTFIX, Font management is not something we should concern
ourselves about. Users with hundreds of fonts should use specialized font
management software that are available for all major
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #10 from Ole Tange ---
Created attachment 139530
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=139530&action=edit
Drop down with substring search
Mockup of what a fontselector could look like.
The text field is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #10)
Interesting idea - and I added it right to the presentation I held at FOSDEM
yesterday. You find the slides at
https://de.slideshare.net/HeikoTietze/improvemen
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #12 from Ole Tange ---
Created attachment 139592
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=139592&action=edit
Mockup2 of multi-column font selector
> But I doubt that a multi-column dropdown is a good solutio
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #12)
> I suggest we simply take the
> current 1-column layout and do as many columns of those as will fit on the
> screen (or window) width.
>
> If we did that, I w
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #14 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #10)
> The text field is for entering substrings, that will dynamically filter the
> list. The substrings can be positive (must contain) or negative (cannot
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||floraca...@qq.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #16 from Ole Tange ---
Created attachment 139865
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=139865&action=edit
Dynamic font selector
Here is an "animation" of how I see the font selector may work.
For novices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #17 from Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) ---
Created attachment 139953
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=139953&action=edit
sections headings inside of the font name list
MS has 'theme fonts' and 'rece
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #18 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #16)
> Created attachment 139865 [details]
> Dynamic font selector
Many thanks for your proposal. We talked about this idea yesterday and some
questions remain.
*
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #19 from Ole Tange ---
> * Simplicity
> It is a huge control spawning over the whole screen but the use case is not
> to see all. And search (type and filter the dropdown) replaces the need for
> a large overview.
Why is it no
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #19)
>> * Simplicity
> Why is it not _a_ use case to see all the fonts?
The user story would be "Benjamin wants to get an overview as he don't know
what fonts are i
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Ole Tange changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #139530|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #22 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #21)
> Benjamin wants to select a font. He cannot remember the name, but he knows
> what it looks like.
That's the only valid use case, IMHO. All other are handled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #23 from Rizal Muttaqin ---
Created attachment 140204
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140204&action=edit
ThinkFree Office font list's preset menu
For additional reference, we could consider what Thi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stu109...@mail.uni-kiel.de
--- Com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #25 from Ole Tange ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #22)
> What I refuse (and other people I talked to as well) is the multi-column
> output.
Can you elaborate on why? What is the problem in presenting multiple col
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #26 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #25)
> > What I refuse (and other people I talked to as well) is the multi-column
> > output.
> Can you elaborate on why?
You focus on the presentation of the lis
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
I'd appreciate such a filter. But what is the default for all OS? Times New
Roman... please don't (unless on Windows). Helvetica, Garamond? And does it
makes sense to mix sans, serif, and mono fonts? Wh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
A (Andy) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #4 from Bastián Díaz ---
It's amazing to have a better font list.
Please consider GtkFontChooserDialog elements
(https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkFontChooserDialog.html) to be
included in the fonts list or character
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #5 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips ---
(In reply to Bastián Díaz from comment #4)
> Please consider GtkFontChooserDialog elements
> (https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkFontChooserDialog.html) to be
> included in the fonts lis
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #6 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #5)
> As it is likely only gtk3, it wouldnt be a solution that would work
> everywhere
I was referring to consider the design elements do not use the sam
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102985
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #49 from Ole Tange ---
(In reply to Arlene from comment #48)
> (In reply to Ole Tange from comment #46)
:
> > Other times I am looking for a special look of the font, but have no idea
> > what it might be called. For this I nee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #50 from Arlene ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #49)
> (In reply to Arlene from comment #48)
> > (In reply to Ole Tange from comment #46)
> :
> > > Other times I am looking for a special look of the font, but have no id
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #51 from Coburn Ingram ---
What people seem to be asking for is tools to streamline their work.
LO already provides a "recent" font list that populates automatically above the
alphabetized list. This list is not always persist
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #52 from robgrune ---
suggestions:
1/ Package LO as a stand-alone, all-inclusive flatpak. To include all help
files, and a very limited set of generic fonts (eg Arial and Times). To exclude
other fonts installed by gnome.
2/
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #53 from Arlene ---
(In reply to robgrune from comment #52)
> 4/ Alter the LO drop down list to enable users to define, choose, label font
> categories. Example of Categories: Apple fonts; MS fonts; Fancy fonts;
> Foreign lang
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #54 from Arlene ---
Created attachment 186345
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=186345&action=edit
Wireframe2.0 of my ideas about redesigned font selector-Arlene
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #55 from Tracey ---
I have a straight forward suggestion:
Show the fonts that are already used in the document at the top separated by a
line then all the available fonts accessible to LibreOffice.
For example: When I am choos
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Dieter Praas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tel...@inboxen.org
--- Comment #27
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Dieter Praas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||113438
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aftertheb...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Dieter Praas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j22...@gmail.com
--- Comment #29 f
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
CC|libreoffice-ux
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||79045_79...@mail.ru
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph.pr...@okstate.edu
--- Comment #33
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |high
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thru...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||traceyad2...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Yeron 50201 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicere1...@snece.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||med.medin.2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #37
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/show_
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robgr...@gmx.com
--- Comment #38 f
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Arlene changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arlen...@outlook.com
--- Comment #39 fro
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #40 from Arlene ---
Using version: LibreOffice 7.5.1
I think this case has two challenges as below:
Challenges:
1. Users have no specific liking of which font they want to use this time (Some
of them may know little about fon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #41 from Coburn Ingram ---
One thing that would really help is linking the default installed fonts to a
user's LOCALE in the operating system. This is an upstream problem, but what
happens on my Ubuntu system, when I choose US
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Arlene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |arlen...@outlook.com
|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Arlene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|arlen...@outlook.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #42 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Arlene from comment #40)
> IDEA: Put 3-5 fonts that are familiar to most users at the top...
Rather the recently used.
> IDEA: Organize the same font family into one row.
Good idea. Turns
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #43 from Arlene ---
Created attachment 186255
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=186255&action=edit
Wireframe1.0 of my ideas about redesigned font selector-Arlene
Please see my wireframe of my ideas fo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #44 from Arlene ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #42)
> (In reply to Arlene from comment #40)
> > IDEA: Put 3-5 fonts that are familiar to most users at the top...
> Rather the recently used.
>
> > IDEA: Organize the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #45 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Arlene from comment #43)
> 1. More Fonts (thinking...)
What is this about?
> 2. Theme Fonts (3-5 most users familiar fonts)
The term "Theme" is occupied as a collection of design elements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #46 from Ole Tange ---
> Feel free to comment on this post about how you(every user of LO) would like
> some customization of the font selector.
On my machine I have not actively added fonts. I have ~250 fonts installed.
Whe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #47 from Arlene ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #45)
> (In reply to Arlene from comment #43)
> > 1. More Fonts (thinking...)
> What is this about?
I was thinking about putting the Sort/Filter feature after people cli
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #48 from Arlene ---
(In reply to Ole Tange from comment #46)
> > Feel free to comment on this post about how you(every user of LO) would
> > like some customization of the font selector.
> On my machine I have not actively ad
63 matches
Mail list logo
