Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2023-04-13

> -> + Shortcuts for "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" > > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45705 > ... > + Word has no zoom in/out, unclear what to do > ... Actually, the Word 2019 desktop canvas responds to "pinch" zoom on trackpad and on touch screens. And similar to LO Zoom

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Impress meta bugs

At the moment there are 1428 open issues against the Impress module. With 39 defined META issues collecting various reports into trackable groups. Current Impress BZ issues

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

@Xisco, * Xisco Fauli wrote > 'Close' is just another status, so if you can change any bug to NEW or > NEEDINFO you can change them to CLOSED as well. However, it depends on > the bug's workflow. Only RESOLVED or VERIFIED bugs can be set to CLOSED > afterwards. /me --*facepalm*-- Never made th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

V Stuart Foote wrote >> contributors limits who can change priority, severity, qa field, and >> assigned So, yes I am in the BZ contributors group--but not sure members the "contributors" group actually have the capability to 'close' or 'request del

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

Xisco Fauli wrote > What do you mean? you are already in the contributor group. you > shouldn't have any limitation or am I missing something? Though QA active before the cut over from the FreeDesktop BZ instance, don't think I've ever had ability to 'close' a bug, nor to mark obvious spam for 'de

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: tweaking Antispam plugin

Xisco, Here is one for you: tdf#34355 Stuart p.s. could you add me to the admin or set permissions so I can do QA 'close', and set 'deletion request' -- Sent from: http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/QA-f

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-documentation] Buttons/Icons missing from the form Formatting Toolbar.

Believe display of the LTR and RTL toolbar buttons are dependent on the Language settings. Support for CTL (language can be none) must be checked enabled (Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages). Then restart Calc. Works like that for me on Windows 10 with 6.2.2 and current master/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Michael Meeks Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:35 AM To: libreoffice-dev; libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > * CTRL+ALT+E isn't opening the extension dialog but inserts a "é" > + https://bugs.documentfounda

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Confusion about most recent builds

Yes that is correct, in the timed-based release development of LibreOffice there are always two "release" branches in active developement/support, with a third master branch in active development. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan If you have been asked to check a current build, tha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Confusion about most recent builds

It depends on what you need--there are 3 active build branches 5.4 Stable (5.4.7 upcomming release); 6.0 Fresh (6.0.3 upcomming release) and master/6.1. Master has the most recent & ongoing development work--new features and initial patches of bugs will occur normally occur on master builds and th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Saying Goodbye

Jay -- Thank you! Stuart -- Sent from: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/QA-f3613148.html ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinf

[Libreoffice-qa] DirectWrite deficienies holding open BZ issues

@Xisco, * Notice we'd reverted a number of closings for BZ issues that are cleared by Khaled's tweak for tdf#112486 "...optionally not using GDI when not using OpenGL (previously we always used GDI when OpenGL was used). I think it w

[Libreoffice-qa] New BZ spam vector

Xisco, * This morning saw a new twist to the BZ spam issues. See existing valid bug tdf#104252 [1], where a BZ user changes elements, linkages and drops in URL links in the URL and Whiteboard fields. The link is to a valid URL containing malware payload (a malformed script in this case). How to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla spam

Another round of spam clobbering BZ all last week and continuing. Anything that can be done? Perhaps the AntiSpam extension for our BZ instance? =-ref-= https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1306750 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Bugzilla-spam-tp

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Incomplete text in menus and dialogs in 5.4.0.1

@Pedro, I looked closer and the "1" and "y", are from Tahoma. Just the x-height and crossbar position had looked stretched vertically to me--compared Segoe and Tahoma side by side the clip shows Tahoma. Sorry for that noise. As to the funky x-scale--unable to reproduce. Tried various Windows co

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Incomplete text in menus and dialogs in 5.4.0.1

@Pedro, You seem to have set a system font other than Segoe UI or Tahoma (looking at the x-height and crossbar positioning). Do you have a LibreOffice replacment table in use? If so clear that and retest, otherwise reset you system font to something with better/correct font metrics. Stuart -

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] proposed keyword filter:docbook

Terrence Enger wrote > Would it be a good idea to have this keyword?  If so, who can make it > happen? Easily done, but looking at the volume for "docbook" or ".dbk" (24 over project duration), probably not necessary. When we triage we try to toss any filter issues into the "filters and storage" c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

Michael Stahl-2 wrote > ... together with an ODF meta-bug that was created in 2015 and that i've > never heard of? I searched but somehow missed Jay's meta -- BZ link is tdf#95487 alias as *ODF-spec*. Added the Keyword and Whiteboard

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

@Regina, * Regina Henschel wrote > ... > does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes > invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way? Strangely, no META that I could find--but probably needed. Otherwise some inconsistent use of Whiteboard "odf" and/o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 5.2.6 RC2 test builds available

Jean-Baptiste Faure-3 wrote > Is it on purpose that RC are not made available on the Development > versions webpage: https://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ ? Actually the link to Access the Pre-releases server and pick the version of your choice there.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for testing. Shutdown problems in Windows

m.a.riosv wrote > there are not daily windows's builds since at least a couple of weeks, > for 5.2 and 5.3 No, Thorsten's TB42 has been rolling master each night. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@42/ Just Kendy's TB39 and Cloph's TB62 have been missing. -- View this mes

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Severity level - propose (minor/normal ?) change in policy

Cor, * Cor Nouws wrote > I want to propose a change to severity levels. > IMO interoperabillity issues should ~never be minor. > Ideas, objections? Sorry, but normal is too high for most interoperability issues. "minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present" The "e

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] (no subject)

@Markus, * Looks like we can "Custom Search" search on the "Crash report or crash signature" for an "is not empty" value, so only advantage to having a keyword set would be to identify the BZ as being generated from the CR portal on review rather than by a user when the CR is submitted. Would e

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Writer] Inserting dummy text, changing font to a non-existing one leads to grey menues in 5.2.0.0RC1

Hello Thomas, Tested your exact STR on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with Version: 5.2.0.1 (x64) Build ID: fcbcb4963bda8633ba72bd2108ca1e802aad557d CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; Locale: en-US (en_US) Can not reproduce on Windows. So, for others can you identify your Deb

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing - Slowness Enable Extended tips?

Miguel Ángel, * On Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with a clear user profile Version: 5.2.0.1 (x64) Build ID: fcbcb4963bda8633ba72bd2108ca1e802aad557d CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; Locale: en-US (en_US) Sorry, no noticeable delay when opening LibreOffice and setting the Ex

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Adding a field for crash reports to bugzilla

Markus, This sounds great, assisting the users to post the minidump details to BZ should help both QA triage, and developer response. And of course the QA Wiki will need to include some guidance on what to do with the minidumps. Two questions... 1.) can our BZ infrastructure grow to hold incr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 or 64 bit)

Issue opened in BugZilla as tdf#100295 . Things have been getting worse, time to officially drop support of Windows XP at 5.2.0? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibODev-5-2-0-0-b2-does-not-run

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 or 64 bit)

@Cloph, * Just did a clean VM install of 32-bit Windows XP sp3, no other updates. Then I also get the same error message. And the GetTickCount64 looks a bit suspicious, what is that? Stuart -- View this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Print current page

Pretty obvious. A specific "Print current page" action was deemed unneeded as the Print Dialog "Pages" field provides capability to select just the single page via radio button. That field is populated with the "current" page on opening the dialog. No sense in a single action .uno command as the

[Libreoffice-qa] provide Bugzilla master to 5.3.0 notation

Robinson, Christian, Joel, * With beta1 for 5.2.0 out, the Bugzilla needs an update to move master to a 5.3.0 notation. Thanks! Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/provide-Bugzilla-master-to-5-3-0-notation-tp4185262.html Sent from the QA mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Check for update

@Pedro, Pedro wrote > Bump! > > One week later (and 18 days after 5.1.3 release) version 5.1.2.2 still > reports it is up to date under Windows. No the PHP script has been updated, if it is not offering 5.1.3.2 there is a new issue in the version signature checks... Christian? Robinson? =-ref-

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] CrashDumps?

You can delete them safely. They are "mini" dumps that depending on available symbols can be attached to WinDbg and analyse the crash, or obtain a stack trace to review. They get generated by default per user into their %USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\CrashDumps if this Windows registry key is pr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

Pedro wrote > Hi Florian > > Long time no see ;) > Florian Reisinger wrote >> Have you installed the correct MS C++ redistributable? I do not which >> version is the baseline ATM... > I sincerely don't know. I never had to worry about that in any software > (including LibreOffice). > If the correc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

@Cloph, * Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but seems the Windows builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging issue of tdf#99285 .

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Possibility of monitoring LibreOffice code with SonarQube

Sure, but do you mean in addition to the very functional Coverity Scan that the project already routinely uses? https://scan.coverity.com/projects/libreoffice Is that just a "belt + suspenders" idea, or is there really substantive advantage to flushing the code base through another quality check?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

Pedro wrote > It couldn't be simple and consistent, could it? Actually, I had thought the (x64) was being applied to info "About" dialog for all builds =) But perusing the code showed it had only been done to distinguish the 64-bit Windows builds. [1] Hmm, maybe I need to spend more time in Li

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

mhenriday wrote > I'd still like to know how to confirm that the same is true of the > LibO version I have installed Suspect a terminal session with cd to the LibreOffice installation and running "file soffice" would suffice. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundatio

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

See this MSDN note: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724832%28v=vs.85%29.aspx -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/More-information-in-About-dialog-tp4177879p4177892.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] More information in About dialog

@Pedro, * Pedro wrote > The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing > list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you > using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?" > > Isn't it possible that this information is included in the About dialog?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 5.1.0RC2 runs on MozTrap

sophi wrote > Hi Stuart, > > Thanks for running your tests on MozTrap. I've seen that you've created > a new run on MozTrap, what was the purpose of this run and why didn't > you use the one that was created? you wanted to test a special build? > In general, it's better to keep the tests in the sa

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Start Center, shortcuts, and so forth

This is wrapped up in Simon and Caolan's work on GTK, and the non-standard way the StartCenter accelerators & shortcuts are cobbled together. Two open issues: Bug 92516 - "x" accelerator and mouse click not exiting StartCenter in "Fil

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Sophi, * Build on Linux but only when patching. Routinely bisect against my archive of daily pulls of Windows TBs. I don't run a bibisect git repo (though I probably should invest in setting up the Windows flavor since we seem short there). Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nab

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-projects] minutes of ESC call ...

Pedro wrote > In case no one noticed the tinderbox is named Win-x86 but the builds are > Win_x64. Wrong upload? Looks like Thorsten just pointed the upload script to Win-x86@42 rather than Win-x86_64@42, simple correction. > How are the VS2015 builds different from those in tinderbox 62-merge-

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-5-0-2 and Tag libreoffice-5.0.2.1 created

No issue, I get a complete download and clean installation of both 32-bit and 64-bit builds of 5.0.2.1 build. Did you attempt to download too soon, only a partial installer had uploaded? LibreOffice_5.0.2.1_Win_x86.msi MD5 5a5b2bf4c026fdfa6344d8bf375563cf SHA-256 325a5a7adb85fb4a8fbfc3614204

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds

@Miguel Ángel, * Both Kendy and Cloph remain on vacation. Thier TBs of master will wait till they get back... just have to roll your own for the time being. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-tp4158636p4158637.html Sent from the QA ma

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with Display of Dialogs of 5.0-beta2

As Anreas is on Linux with KDE4, this is likely to be tdf#91301 which should be resolved with a 5.0.0beta4 build. Unclear of any relation to the other tdf#91882 issue which

[Libreoffice-qa] Need some QA assistance in Deutsch Windows and de-DE LO build -- tdf#85891 Symbols to small in Formulas

Hi, could someone working in a Deutsch flavor of Windows running a de-DE build of LibreOffice have a poke at https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 Thanks! Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Need-some-QA-assistance-in-Deutsch-Window

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Pedro, It has never worked that way. The default has been, and remains, that when you comment the CC List: "checkbox" to "Add me to CC list" is checked by default. When you revisit a bug that you are on the CC list (while logged-in) you will see a count of CC users "including you" if you are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Pedro, Pedro wrote > I have never added myself to CC on any bug I commented in the past and yet > I used to receive new comments/answers to my comments and changes to > status. I think it makes sense that it works this way (i.e. no need to > explicitly adding yourself to cc, if you comment you are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow

Sorry, forgot to mention that if/when it is merged from Gerrit, you should add a a note in the BZ issue whiteboard, e.g. target:5.0.0 ( ref https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced#target ) If you feel the patch should be ported back to a prior branch-- you will

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow

@Philippe, Your patch for tdf#34555 "Make cropping handles for images (as in Draw/Impress) available for all LibreOffice applications" is sitting in the Code review queue in Gerrit. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/15541/ Dependin

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Versions: 4.5-master vs. 5.0-master ?

Pedro wrote > Since there are no 4.5 specific bugs (even if there were some regressions, > there will be no final 4.5.0 version) it doesn't make any sense to keep > 4.5 > > There is no 4.5 version. TDF is jumping from 4.4 to 5.0 so all bugs > reported while 4.5 was under development now only refer

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Versions: 4.5-master vs. 5.0-master ?

@Robinson, Robinson Tryon wrote > Hi all, > > Raal brings up a good point regarding versions in Bugzilla: We're > jumping right from 4.4 -> 5.0, so 4.5.0.0alpha0+ has just become > 5.0.0.0.0alpha0+ (master) in daily builds. > > There are a few different ways we can deal with this change in > Bug

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] help from Debian distro user on tdf#88117

Bit further to this, disconnect in STR for the bug--https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 SVG export filtering makes distinction between exporting entire Draw ODG, and selecting some portion of the Draw elements and exporting. A selection of Draw elements results in a truncati

[Libreoffice-qa] help from Debian distro user on tdf#88117

Could someone running Debian 7 or 8, have a look at tdf#88117 - image truncated when exported to svg . Can't repro any mix of Windows, Fedora, or RHEL -- so possibly Debian distro specific. Thanks. Stuart -- View this message in c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

@Joel, Think you need to share that query list for us to be able to run it--currently return invalid. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugs-with-Backtrace-but-Not-Reproduced-tp4142359p4142406.html Sent from the QA mailing list arch

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Background/frame regressions in 4.4

The issues are all result of the substantial refactoring of Writers style frames, first put in at 4.3 then pulled out, and left in 4.4 which continues to have issues. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=6e61ecd09679a66060f932835622821d39e92f01 as ref'd comment 4 of tdf#86578

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Background/frame regressions in 4.4

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > Once the dupes are sorted out, at least one of these should likely be a > MAB, if > only for the dupes count. Perhaps tdf#86578 ? Have set duplicates. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.docume

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.4.1 rc2 test builds available

@Cloph, * Needs more investigation, but looks like there may be continuing issues with signing of the OS X builds and Gatekeeper... Reopened -- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84352 (Assigned to S. Bergmann) New -- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89561 (or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] that walrus

Bjoern, *, Wow, I like "Antje"--a nice tip of the hat to the StarDivision pioneers... So, does Robinson's caricature exhibit any resemblance to the original "Antje"? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-that-walrus-tp4137990p4138161.html

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Reminder: LibreOffice Bugzilla Migration will happen next Saturday (Jan 24th)

Robinson, *, So until migration is "underway", our existing credential's have been copied--but are not functional. At what point can we actually set our password on the tdf instance of bugzilla? Currently the reset is referring the dialog back to fdo--a little confusing. When should we attempt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] SVG filter issues BZ 88277 BZ 88278

t;:]]svg[[:>:]] or [[:<:]]SVG[[:>:]] it is much more revealing that just SVG strings in the short description... Stuart From: Joel Madero Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 3:33 PM To: V Stuart Foote Cc: libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Li

[Libreoffice-qa] SVG filter issues BZ 88277 BZ 88278

Folks, I've spun up two new meta issues to help wrangle issues affecting our handling of SVG. Two because we have two filter mechanisms for handling SVG. Bug 88277 - Meta: SVG fileOpen filter (Draw) Bug 88278 - Meta: insert SVG image filter

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] installation of daily build for Win

Hi Terry, I get a clean /A administrative install of the build. Here are HASHs for a clean download. MD5 d4fd4717662800ed9ddf2613e2ca82f2 SHA-256 18903d3b926f9fc328b15c6d7e0d7e2346149ddd5172f88630e655aa

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

jmadero wrote >> why not using a special whiteboard tag like "ping", "pingQA" or >> "ping012, "ping02" etc. etc. ? > I'm not completely opposed but I hate cluttering the whiteboard even > more...if others agree, I will do so. No objections, and I like the "pingQA" whiteboard tag. Just one would k

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

@Joel, *, The message text reads well, recipients should not object. > ...2+ years no activity, exclude anything with meta or easyhack, also > excluded are enhancement requests A result of ~= 310 seems about the right scope, while a quick review of list had nothing whacky. Stuart -- View t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] UI enhancements filled by UX members

Robinson Tryon wrote > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Joel Madero < > jmadero.dev@ > > wrote: >> Hi All, >>> To sum up, enhancements opened by UX members are set as NEW and assigned >>> to UX-advice so they are not triaged by QA members and don't appear in >>> the QA stats. >> By assign - if y

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] question about a bug confirmation

@Markus, LOL, I almost answered it that way as well. But then I ran through the example document and created one of my own. I'm comfortable saying there is a logic flaw when assigning the cell formatting when two sum() ranges containing currency formatted data are divided. Weird, in that we

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] question about a bug confirmation

@Lera, *, First thank you for taking on the translation tasks, we know it can be challenging. Lera Goncharuk wrote > Do I understand correctly, that we should consult with developers when a > bug > violates principles of mathematical calculations and we give the status > NEW > only when develo

[Libreoffice-qa] Liberation font issues in Math -- any ideas?

Need some QA help with a localization aspect of using Liberation fonts in a Math formula. Poking at fdo#85891 , user looks to be on a Windows German localization, and his Liberation fonts are being mangled (size and position) in Math. Accordi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Release Notes Whiteboard Keyword

Top posting reply to Joel's note... Actually, it makes a lot of sense in that release notes really need a more descriptive narrative for substantive enhancements and bug fixes. As is we often simply list the fixes against prior releases. Envision this whiteboard tagging would support two aspec

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bugzilla search

@Terry, Not just you, I ran your query multiple times same result, and then realized what it was. It is subtle, as it looks the same--but the Description of an attachment is actually not tagged as a "Comment" for use in query. It has its own field "Attachment description" that can only be used fr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.7 RC1 test builds available

Dan, *, Lionel would need to comment, but with just the final bug-fix release pending, IMHO it is not going to make it into 4.2 Suspect this is one of those issues that really can not, and should not be back ported--as simply too much of the infrastructure in base changed between 4.2 and 4.3

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.5

Joel, Kind of looks like they did... https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/admin.cgi Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/fdo-Bugzilla-upgraded-to-4-4-5-tp4124643p4124714.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Scrollbar missing at "Tools - Options - LibreOfficeDev - Appearance" in LO 4.4.0.0alpha under Debian Testing i686

Thomas, Jay, *, Guess then it must have been Jay's message from Sep 4th finally clearing moderation. So Jay, are you good now with the scroll bar on the Appearance panel on the 32-bit TB45 builds? Can we set the fdo#81920 back to Resolved WFM? Stuart -- View this message in context: http

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Update to wiki Development/Java page

@Owen, *, Great, but I think the numbers are even better in 4.3 and current builds of master. Between 4.2.x and 4.3.x we dumped most of the Java based accessibility bridge. See this commit by David Ostrovsky -- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=130833f80e89774269108cf30b2d1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Scrollbar missing at "Tools - Options - LibreOfficeDev - Appearance" in LO 4.4.0.0alpha under Debian Testing i686

See fdo#81920 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81920 ) , had been closed WFM, but reopening for you... From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Jay Philips Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:14 PM To: Thomas Hackert; libreoffice-qa@lists.freede

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Scrollbar missing at "Tools - Options - LibreOfficeDev - Appearance" in LO 4.4.0.0alpha under Debian Testing i686

@Thomas, On Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fd81523328891c69ee7cb28bf22308225da42744 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-09-03_08:48:37 Not having this issue, the scroll bar appears in the Tools --> Options --> Appearance panel for this build. __

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Missing "Tools - Options - Internet - MediaWiki" options in LO 4.4.0.0

@Thomas, Sorry, can't check. No MediaWiki option on the TB39 builds for Windows Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fd81523328891c69ee7cb28bf22308225da42744 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-09-03_08:48:37 From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Suggestion for the use of pre-written responses

Jay, *, Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the best interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi. It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over their life span. Otherwise, duri

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Toolbar Proposal Completed

Jay forgot to add it, but his work up on this is an active BZ issue-- fdo#81475 . More on the proposal is detailed there. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Toolbar-Proposal-Complete

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3.0 new features and communication

Sophi, *, Back with a bit more meat to those issues, also scratch the general issues with UI scroll bar, with the 4.3.0.2 rc2 build they seem to have resolved. Stuart > 1. Globally assigned accelerators from VCL vs. UI based GUI's are a mess > (e.g. Main Menu vs. StartCenter) fdo#80477

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3.0 new features and communication

Sophie, *, So don't have but a moment to comment (sorry for not digging out the fdo bugzilla IDs) but several fit-n-finish issues that could use some attention or release note comment prior to release. 1. Globally assigned accelerators from VCL v.s UI based GUI's are a mess (e.g. Main Menu vs. S

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

V Stuart Foote wrote > So the repackaging done for beta2 now does pass the YUM dependency and > verification steps of Fedora 20. Looking at the YUM install log, I do see this error--seems trivial, and the desktop launchers otherwise have icons and have a launch action associated. Oth

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

Christian, *, Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > It is yum performing the version check differently than rpm itself does > it. > > Anyway - changing the debian-specific change to an overall linux > packaging change should please yum as well... > In any case no problem for the RCs, only master/the alpha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

Christian, *, Ran through attempts to install RPM packaging using YUM and have attached a full log of both the 4.3.0beta1 and the TB46 4.4.0alpah0+ 20140531 build. Interesting stuff is in the Error stanzas at the end of the logs--are the <= testing logic correct where failing? LODev430beta1_YUM_

[Libreoffice-qa] Issue with TB46 build of Master and with 4.3.0 beta 1 RPM packaging

Help... I was working on FDO 79489 (a dup of 73806) -- Expert Configuration - default window frame of configuration table is too large, unable to resize-- and I was attempting to install a current Linux build from RPM packaging. Working on a Fedora 20, 64-bit VM, and I am getting this dependenc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 Bug Hunting Weekend!

@Christian, Traveling this week, but did an install of the windows build of LODev4.3.0beta1 on a borrowed Windows 7 sp1, 32-bit system. Beta1 install goes fine. But on initial launch get a pop-up error: Download and installation o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 Bug Hunting Weekend!

A reminder for folks that with the 4.3.0beta they will need to install the Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 C++ run-time if not already present. Available here: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679# -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Have adjusted title of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 -- Other: LibreOffice crashes as soon as one enters text in a module, this on TDF release configured TB51. QA needs to determine if this affects only TB51 configuration, or also TB39 and TB42 as well--if someone has a mom

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

So looking at today's TB51 build for Windows, getting crash on text entry in impress, writer and calc. Have reopened https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 Similar stack traces as below on crash of writer, calc, impress--also immediate crash attempting to launch any Tools -> Options ->

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo#77479

Kohei, So confirmed at least as far back as 3.5.x, but probably some of the work you and Markus did Nov 2011 in lead up to 3.4.0 Issue is confirmed--and have set the bug to NEW. The issue is that when the AutoFilter buttons are cleared during a Sort--if there were any filters applied those det

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Pedro, *, Pre-release Windows build of Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID: 46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781 Was definitely broken as in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 , not sure of the exact reason, but it is NOT isolated to Windows XP. Also, prior an

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

Tested on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: d09d75167d77adcc8538c5cc5d8fe6bac6091ca1 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2014-05-05_23:04:20 All seems to be corrected now. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Somethi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No thinderbox build for Windows master after 30-04-14

Markus, While the TB's are back on line. Look to have a lingering issue with the builds where now toolbar action (Tools -> Options for example) has lost its resulting actions and the UI simply hangs with a partial GUI dialog opening. Reported in BZ as fdo#78266

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

@Miguel Ángel, I don't think the issue on Windows XP is related. But confirming your report with todays resumption of TB builds on Windows. Possibly something is still off with the mass-spelling corrections that had broken the MSI packaging on Windows. Stuart -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Joel, 4.3.0 Alpha1 on the Pre-release page http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86.msi -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Running-LO-4-3-alpha-i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Here is a stack trace for a crashing writer session on XP sp3... soffice.bin =-=-= ntdll.dll!KiFastSystemCallRet kernel32.dll!WaitForMultipleObjects+0x18 kernel32.dll!GetSystemDirectoryW+0x35 kernel32.dll!UnhandledExceptionFilter+0x55c MSVCR110.dll!_crtUnhandledException+0x14 MSVCR110.dll!_invalid

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Hmm, may have something going on Same Windows XP sp3 VM on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit With TDF alpha1 release Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID: 46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781 This build is launches, writer and calc crash with any text entry. Impress and Draw crash at initial launch when the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

Just installed to a Windows XP sp3 VM running on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: f76026a43acc65465882924796d93e635c35fd90 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-05-04_06:34:33 Fully functional all components, no issues. -- View this message in context: http:/

  1   2   >