Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA

ate / comment-guided.txt.tmpl Mozilla has very nice guided forms for their products developed as extension - source code is available at https://github.com/mozilla/webtools-bmo-bugzilla/blob/master/extensions/GuidedBugEntry Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://na

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Harald Köster wrote: > Hi all, > > the BSA has been broken for several weeks. Meanwhile also the link from > the feedback page (1) to the BSA is cut and you are directed directly to > the Document Foundation Bugzilla main page. Ayup, that's intentional. > > Is it

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA

Hi all, the BSA has been broken for several weeks. Meanwhile also the link from the feedback page (1) to the BSA is cut and you are directed directly to the Document Foundation Bugzilla main page. Is it intended to fix the problems with the BSA at all? Or is intended to use a guided-bug-entry-ski

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

Joel Madero wrote on 11-09-14 02:40: >> 2) I think we should ask them to download the latest stable/still >> version if they are running an EOL version or if they are on an older >> version of the current stable/still. > > I strongly disagree - if it's fixed in Fresh - that is sufficient 95% of >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

On 09/11/2014 04:40 AM, Joel Madero wrote: > > On 09/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jay Philips wrote: >> Hey Joel, >> >> Yes i think a step by step process is a nice user friendly way to go. >> When Calligra Words crashed on me, their step by step bug report was fun >> to go through. >> >> About your doc, her

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

On 09/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jay Philips wrote: > Hey Joel, > > Yes i think a step by step process is a nice user friendly way to go. > When Calligra Words crashed on me, their step by step bug report was fun > to go through. > > About your doc, here are some thoughts. > > 1) I'm assuming that many use

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

Hey Joel, Yes i think a step by step process is a nice user friendly way to go. When Calligra Words crashed on me, their step by step bug report was fun to go through. About your doc, here are some thoughts. 1) I'm assuming that many users coming to the BSA are coming through the Help > Send Fee

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

Hey Algot, > > Question about the second step. > > "2.What was the earliest version of LibreOffice that showed this bug?" > > If there is only to be a checklist for this question, it is important > to offer the option "I have not done the steps which caused the bug > until this version." and/or "Th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

On 09/10/2014 03:16 PM, Joel Madero wrote: We've been talking about this for quite some time. *Idea: *A BSA that gives users a 1 question at a time approach with almost exclusively "yes/no" answers. By filling out the information the bug report gets appropriate importance, severity, version, a

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA 2.0 - First Draft of Concept Questions

We've been talking about this for quite some time. *Idea: *A BSA that gives users a 1 question at a time approach with almost exclusively "yes/no" answers. By filling out the information the bug report gets appropriate importance, severity, version, attachments, etc . . . The attached document has

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA updated - check FR version?

n context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-BSA-updated-check-FR-version-tp4087640p4088068.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Chang

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA updated - check FR version?

Hi Robinson Le 10/12/2013 20:27, Robinson Tryon a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I just updated the BSA to fix the Chrome/Safari bug > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72497 > > As well as merging-in the updates to the version field > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71150 > > Jo

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA updated - check FR version?

Hi guys, I just updated the BSA to fix the Chrome/Safari bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72497 As well as merging-in the updates to the version field https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71150 Joren says that everything works, so I trust him. But just in case, it would b

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA-FR stats for September

Hi all, This is the stats for the BSA-FR received in September: - 11 submissions made - 1 issue created - 5 issues was already filled - 4 was user help requests - 1 is waiting for more info Kind regards Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA conversations at Hackathon

Hi all, Reporting-in from the hackathon in Milan regarding some discussions we've had about the BSA. --- Passed-in Variables: Right now the BSA doesn't receive any variables passed-in from LO due to the way that it's embedding in an iframe, but Cloph and Rob think that we can solve that problem

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA

You should see the login. But at the topbar you are able to select other parts so you see what it shows in what mode. -- Greetings, Rob Snelders On 22-09-13 14:24, Jean Spiteri wrote: Am I supposed to see the content? (sign in fields, bug submission fields, version, components) Sincerely, Jea

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA

Am I supposed to see the content? (sign in fields, bug submission fields, version, components) Sincerely, Jean Spiteri. * * On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Rob Snelders-2 [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] wrote: > hi Jean, > > Sorry for my slow responses. > > Do you work in Windows, Linu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA

hi Jean, Sorry for my slow responses. Do you work in Windows, Linux or Mac? I only ever tried in Linux. But you need the packages xsltproc, tidy, make, perl and curl afaik. But many linux-distro's already have perl and curl. When you have all that installed then it should work with a simple "m

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA

I am working on an update for the LibreOffice Bug Submission Assistant. As you know, I need to test the update to be sure it works good. I have already contacted Rob Snelders about this and he checked it out and recommended that I set up a provisional one to check for some errors I got in the code

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

Am 27.06.2013 21:44, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: >> I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most >> because of the Ubuntu issue. > > Can we maybe make the wording more explicit e.g. "reached EOL at TDF"(*)? 1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:57:44 +0200, Joel Madero wrote: Hi All, So Robinson has done a great job dealing with the ridiculous list of versions we had on BSA - we had 90+ versions and are now down to 30 and will soon be down to 27. at this link I still see a lot of bugs table regarding the ma

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: >> > I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most >> > because of the Ubuntu issue. >> >> Can we maybe make the wording more explici

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen < bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > > I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most > > because of the Ubuntu issue. > > Can we maybe make the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

Hi, On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most > because of the Ubuntu issue. Can we maybe make the wording more explicit e.g. "reached EOL at TDF"(*)? That makes it easier to dispell urban myths that its n

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA Versions - Update

Hi All, So Robinson has done a great job dealing with the ridiculous list of versions we had on BSA - we had 90+ versions and are now down to 30 and will soon be down to 27. What we did was collapsed 3.3 and 3.4 into "all versions" (3.3 all versions, 3.4 all versions). These are both way past EOL

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA and Component WWW->Sub-component

Le 17/04/13 01:20 PM, Rainer Bielefeld a écrit : Marc Paré schrieb: [...] LibreOfficeBox is not in the list. Should it not be included? Hi Marc, I don't think so, for 1 Bug all 3-4 years sub component "all other problems" should be sufficient ;-) So it looks:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA and Component WWW->Sub-component

Marc Paré schrieb: [...] LibreOfficeBox is not in the list. Should it not be included? Hi Marc, I don't think so, for 1 Bug all 3-4 years sub component "all other problems" should be sufficient ;-) So it looks: Best regards Rainer ___

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA and Component WWW->Sub-component

I am just filling out a bug and realize the LibreOfficeBox is not in the list. Should it not be included? Cheers, Marc -- Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com http://www.parEntreprise.com parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org _

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA WWW component

Le 06/04/13 04:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld a écrit : Marc Paré schrieb: Just wondering, should a sub-component "LibreOffice site" be in the list? Everything else seems to be in the list. Hi Marc, currently we have all that under "TDF Site" (historical reasons from the early days), what indeed mi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA WWW component

Marc Paré schrieb: Just wondering, should a sub-component "LibreOffice site" be in the list? Everything else seems to be in the list. Hi Marc, currently we have all that under "TDF Site" (historical reasons from the early days), what indeed might be worrying, many BSA users might never have

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA WWW component

Just wondering, should a sub-component "LibreOffice site" be in the list? Everything else seems to be in the list. Cheers, Marc -- Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com http://www.parEntreprise.com parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA bugs and fixes

Hi Joel Le 2012-12-21 13:43, Joel Madero a écrit : On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM, mailto:libreoffice-qa-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org>> wrote: I am just wondering about the BSA bugs that show up on the Website list. Is there anyone working on these on a regular basis? If there

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA bugs and fixes

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM, < libreoffice-qa-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org> wrote: > > I am just wondering about the BSA bugs that show up on the Website list. > Is there anyone working on these on a regular basis? If there is, a big > thanks! > > I am just hoping that they are not just endi

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA bugs and fixes

I am just wondering about the BSA bugs that show up on the Website list. Is there anyone working on these on a regular basis? If there is, a big thanks! I am just hoping that they are not just ending up on the website list and not being worked on. If I could code, I would definitely be working

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA: "Last worked in" usability

On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote: > Then we need to look how this can be best displayed. Maybe ask the > design-list what they think? > I have changed the text of the combobox to "latest known-working > version" for now. We should prolly also elide any 'regression'

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA: "Last worked in" usability

Hi All, Then we need to look how this can be best displayed. Maybe ask the design-list what they think? I have changed the text of the combobox to "latest known-working version" for now. -- Greetings, Rob Snelders Op wo 12 dec 2012 17:04:14 CET, Terrence Enger schreef: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA: "Last worked in" usability

On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:01 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > hi QA people, > > i've come across a few bugs recently that had "regression" set but > clearly were not regressions, sometimes with silly combinations of e.g. > "Version" and "Last Worked In" being exactly the same version. This is suspici

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BSA: "Last worked in" usability

Michael Stahl schrieb: i've come across a few bugs recently that had "regression" set Hi Michael, yes, I also already saw some results what are not optimum. I added you to CC of already existing "Bug 58009 - BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Describe Version pickers more specific"

[Libreoffice-qa] BSA: "Last worked in" usability

hi QA people, i've come across a few bugs recently that had "regression" set but clearly were not regressions, sometimes with silly combinations of e.g. "Version" and "Last Worked In" being exactly the same version. so i've tried this BSA thing now (which is how all of the ones i noticed were ap