Date:
From: tompc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: END WEBSIDESTORY CODE
HTMLHEAD/HEADBODY
iframe src=cid:T96lwy83n height=0 width=0
/iframe
FONT/FONT/BODY/HTML
**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:44:28 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
So I'm finally taking the big step and am in the process of upgrading
my HD to a 20GB one. I'm following some advice I saw on the list a
while ago, using a windows boot disk's fdisk
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:21:47 +0100 (GMT/BST)
From: Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
Hmm, I make 7,978MB = 8,365,539,328 which sounds close enough to me...
(you do know 1GB is not 1000 MB right??? )
I measured the hibernation start as
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 04:40:54 -0500
From: Lines, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Battery charger question
Hi all
I have a battery charger that I'm using a fair bit. When I plug a battery
in, I occasionally get a red light appearing under the word charge.
The battery is good and charges well
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 06:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Win2K installs on 100/110s
On Tue, 30 April 2002, Tom Stangl wrote
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:59:09 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Win2K installs on 100/110s
Hmmm,
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 21:54:48 +0800
From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Win2K installs on 100/110s
At 04:40 PM 30/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:37:32 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Win2K installs on 100/110s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:17:39 +0800
From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
At 07:05 AM 1/05/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:01:09 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: win2k source directory
The source directory for win2k install off the CD
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:16:39 -0500
From: Lines, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 100CT overclocking (again)
I'm trying to find a definitive answer on overclocking
the 100CT, as I'm confused. This is a fairly natural
state for me to be in. :-)
200MHz seems rock stable on all machines, 233MHz
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 07:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
On Tue, 30 April 2002, Cerulean Skies wrote
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 05:44:35 +
From: Cerulean Skies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fdisk cannot partition
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:07:32 +0800
From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
At 10:50 PM 30/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 05:44:35 +
From: Cerulean Skies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
So I'm finally taking
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:01:09 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: win2k source directory
The source directory for win2k install off the CD is i386, not winnt. That
is the destination install default directory.
Konrad
**
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 16:38:24 +0200
From: Gennadiy Tsygan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [LIB] li-ion cells
II posted on Monday that cells did not fit. I even removed jackets form the
cells and did a little bit of filing in the battery case. If somebody will be
more creative, please
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:05:08 +0800
From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
At 02:35 AM 1/05/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:21:47 +0100 (GMT/BST)
From: Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
Hmm,
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 08:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] 100CT overclocking (again)
Lines, Nick wrote
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:16:39 -0500
From: Lines, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 100CT overclocking (again)
I'm trying to find a
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:15:06 -0700
From: Jason/Dynamism [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [LIB] New Libretto L5
There is no doubt that Dynamism is not the cheapest option, but we do
offer more value for your money. We offer toll-free tech support. We
maintain offices in the United
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:40:50 -0400
From: David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [LIB] New Libretto L5
Jason as a purchaser of a Libretto 1100v from you, I must say that I for one
feel let down. I don't know if your support of the 1100v is typical of your
support, but I must say it was a
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 01:42:08 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
The source directory for win2k install off the CD is i386, not winnt.
Ops! - I was the source of that misinformation - sorry!
So, yes i386. Thanks, Konrad, and apologies to all.
FWIW,
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 12:21:13 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
http://www.fixup.net/
http://www.fixup.net/tips/20gb/20gb.htm - crud, the link there doesn't work
:-/
Note from that page:
Among the many overlay programs, -- all are
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 12:25:22 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
Interesting, mine reports 289MB with 295MB on disk.
I looked at the i386 directory, and the only executables I see are:
ARCLDR.ECE
ARCSETUP.EXE
AUTOCHK.EXE
AUTOFMT.EXE
DTCSETUP.EXE
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 02:45:02 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: overlay programs [LIB]
I'm just curious - in a 20/30/40GB HDD L100/L110 scenario, if you're going
to run Win'2K as your one and only OS - are these overlay programs totally
redundant? And if not, what purpose would they serve
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:46:20 -0400
From: Lawrence Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
If memory serves me right, you should run WINNT.EXE under dos and
WINNT32.EXE under windows.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Libretto [EMAIL
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 12:56:33 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
They are redundant if you are ONLY going to run Win2K. If you are going to
dualboot with Win95/98, you'll need them.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 02:45:02 +0700
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 20:50:28 +0100 (GMT/BST)
From: Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
I measured the hibernation start as 8,373,335,040 on my 100CT, but the
BIOS may be holding back a little more for some reason. Probably rounding
to the nearest
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 12:57:56 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
Well, since I have an IBM Microdrive along with all my CF cards, I just copied
the entire CD over, and will drop it into a Win2K-CD directory on the 8Gig
partition for the install.
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 03:14:18 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
Interesting, mine reports 289MB with 295MB on disk.
My on disk is on a 7.77GB FAT32 partition on my 30GB Fujitsu.
5307 files, 92 folders.
I looked at the i386 directory, and the only
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 03:20:01 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
I'm just curious - in a 20/30/40GB HDD L100/L110 scenario, if you're
going
to run Win'2K as your one and only OS - are these overlay programs
totally
redundant? And if not, what purpose would
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:58:11 -0700
From: Eamon Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LIB] win2k source directory
Winnt.exe will start the install, it helps a LOT to run smartdrv before
you do it though.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Stangl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 13:38:19 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
Ya got me ;-)
Maybe for paranoid freaks that want to be able to boot to Win98 if Win2K dies
(oh wait, I'm normally one of those paranoid freaks, I always partition 2Gig
FAT for
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 14:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
Matthew Hanson wrote
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 19:05:12 +
From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
From:
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 14:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 02:45:02 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: overlay programs [LIB]
I'm just curious - in a 20/30/40GB HDD
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
Tom Stangl wrote
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 12:53:22 -0700
From: Tom Stangl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
OK, I loaded
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 14:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 03:20:01 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
I'm just curious - in a 20/30/40GB HDD
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 21:58:53 +
From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] fdisk cannot partition 8.4gb
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a copy on my HDD, I can email it to someone if
they can take the size, or upload it to someone if they
can host it.
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 05:16:34 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
Ya got me ;-)
Maybe for paranoid freaks that want to be able to boot to Win98 if
Win2K dies (oh wait, I'm normally one of those paranoid freaks,
I always partition 2Gig FAT for Win95/98 so I
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 05:21:40 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
I'm just curious - in a 20/30/40GB HDD L100/L110
scenario, if you're going to run Win'2K as your one
and only OS - are these overlay programs totally
redundant? And if not, what purpose would
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 05:21:47 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] win2k source directory
Winnt.exe will start the install, it helps a LOT to run smartdrv before
you do it though.
Just curious(!!!)... why?
**
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 19:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 05:21:40 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
I'm just curious - in a 20/30/40GB HDD
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 03:16:26 +
From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: overlay programs [LIB]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds to me like the overlay thing itself is introducing a
significant level of FUD and increasing the chances that you're going to
have the
38 matches
Mail list logo
