On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Also, if you create and assign issues to be fixed to 1.0.15, then of
> course I'm going to be reluctant to go to 1.0.15 without fixing them.
> That's partially why I delayed the release again when you added the Ext
> Descriptors issue on that li
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> This being said, here are the items I'd prefer not to go to release without:
> - #98, for the reason explained above
Okay.
> - Introducing a LIBUSB_CAP_HAS_HID capability, on the model of
> libusb's LIBUSB_CAP_HAS_HOTPLUG. This shouldn't take
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.03.06 02:20, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> Okay, I tested with different driver and libusbk.sys/libusb0.sys are both
>> okay with the latest git.
>
> Thanks for the test. My understanding is that this was with the
> Microchip stack and that OS
On 2013.03.06 02:32, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Right now there are still a few issues open for 1.0.15 release. I think none
> of them are really critical, perhaps with the exception of #97 (64bit issue
> for Mac OS X).
Yeah, sorry for not posting about the 1.0.15 release. I've been trying
to gear up
On 2013.03.06 02:20, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Okay, I tested with different driver and libusbk.sys/libusb0.sys are both
> okay with the latest git.
Thanks for the test. My understanding is that this was with the
Microchip stack and that OS X and Linux work too?
I'm kind of getting conflicting data f
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:
>>> Note that Windows 8 now requires a CAT file
>>> for all driver packages.
>> Does this cat file needs to be signed? Where is
>> this documented?
>
> I couldn't find
